OK we will go slowly there.
One of the problem is that flaps are taking also a cpu
On Sep 27, 2008, at 12:27 AM, Gary Chambers wrote:
I quite like the tools flap, when configured for auto-popout and
with "solid" style...
Just my 2c
Gary.
- Original Message - From: "Igor Stasenko"
On Sep 26, 2008, at 10:07 PM, Simon Kirk wrote:
hi Stef.
Hmm, strange. How are you viewing the diffs? If I browse the MCZ in
a Monticello browser I see extensions to these classes:
BrowserCommentTextMorph
BrowserRequestor
CanvasCharacterScanner
Character
ConnectionQueue
GrafPort
MultiCanva
I quite like the tools flap, when configured for auto-popout and with
"solid" style...
Just my 2c
Gary.
- Original Message -
From: "Igor Stasenko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "An open mailing list to discuss any topics related to an
open-sourceSmalltalk"
Sent: Wednesday, September 24,
hi Stef.
Hmm, strange. How are you viewing the diffs? If I browse the MCZ in a
Monticello browser I see extensions to these classes:
BrowserCommentTextMorph
BrowserRequestor
CanvasCharacterScanner
Character
ConnectionQueue
GrafPort
MultiCanvasCharacterScanner
NaturalLanguageTranslator
Random
I'm trying to understand the problem
I have the hypothesis that this is linked with the class extension or
the fact that the package does not exist in the image.
Can you also check that you can see diff when the changes is in an
class extension?
Because this is strange with some packages I c
Simon
with which machine did you create you mcz?
Because apparently I can see the diffs for other packages.
Can somebody else check the pinesoft package I put in the pharoInbox?
Stef
Hi all.
Gary and I decided we ought to give out an MCZ of our fixes that
we've put together over the last
because there is a package Network YM 44
Please please avoid to use initials.
Stef
___
Pharo-project mailing list
Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
Hi
I'm tracking a problem I have and which is quite annoying
I cannot see the diff when I do a merge or browse with MC.
I'm with 10074 and I woudl like to know if you have the same behavior.
Stef
___
Pharo-project mailing list
Pharo-project@lists.gfor
My objection, the big ball of mud called Kernel-Extensions and the
liberal
use of overrides, which I think are evil. I like using packages
that do
their best to only use extensions and don't just go around the
system willy
nilly monkey patching everything. I don't trust packages with
ov
This is GREAT!
you checked with Pharo, so I will check to see and publish that.
Stef
On Sep 26, 2008, at 6:36 PM, Simon Kirk wrote:
Hi all.
Gary and I decided we ought to give out an MCZ of our fixes that
we've put together over the last two years.
Obviously some of those we found have b
> On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 8:38 AM, Lukas Renggli
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > One problem I see with Sake/Packages is that these tools depend on a
> > lot of other packages, that I don't necessarily want to
> have loaded in
> > my images: Logging, Rio, Installer, Sake, Packages ...
> >
> > I
Hi all.
Gary and I decided we ought to give out an MCZ of our fixes that we've
put together over the last two years.
Obviously some of those we found have been pulled into Pharo already,
but the attached MCZ represents those that we think are still
relevant :)
This is a rough list of th
Damien
can you post the code to load
Sake
Packages
MC1.6
For me I'm always lost.
Stef
___
Pharo-project mailing list
Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
What is Packages?
compared to Sake
I tried to understand some of the emails keith sent a while back to
squeak-dev but I could not get it.
Setf
Sake/Packages is just about that: a declarative way to specify
packages. Nothing more. And there is a script which converts a
Universe to a set o
On Sep 26, 2008, at 5:03 PM, Damien Cassou wrote:
On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 8:26 AM, Stéphane Ducasse
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
- For example I would like to have a real look at MC1.6 but the
message around it is blurry
MC1.6 is not the topic here.
Still this is the same :). It is a communica
On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 2:59 PM, Janko Mivšek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think you answered already: no GUI, no integration with tools. I see that
> as the only obstacle to a broader acceptance of Keith's work.
For a long time, debian linux systems did not have any GUI to manage
their packages
On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 8:38 AM, Lukas Renggli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> One problem I see with Sake/Packages is that these tools depend on a
> lot of other packages, that I don't necessarily want to have loaded in
> my images: Logging, Rio, Installer, Sake, Packages ...
>
> I guess one could ar
On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 8:26 AM, Stéphane Ducasse
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> - For example I would like to have a real look at MC1.6 but the
> message around it is blurry
MC1.6 is not the topic here.
> I tried LFP and it broke on me.
It worked fine for me. You may want to try again and send bu
Hello all,
Have a look at:
http://www.object-arts.com/content/news/excitingNews.html
Object Arts and Lesser Software are collaborating on a new version of
Dolphin. They are still sticking to the Windows-only angle, which I
find disappointing. However, even if they hold to that, we are better
Damien Cassou wrote:
On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 12:19 AM, Keith Hodges <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Do have a look at Sake/Packages equivalent to universes.
I agree with Keith. Sake/Packages have all the features of universes
without a GUI but provide an easy way to define your own universe as
you
20 matches
Mail list logo
