Alexandre Bergel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Maybe some comment using "..." are present in the code that is ignored
> for some reason from the compiler.
>
> Cheers,
> Alexandre
>
> On 3 Nov 2008, at 19:16, Michael Roberts wrote:
>
> > -9 lines? did I read that right?
> >
> > Mike
> >
>
2008/11/3 Adrian Lienhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> ok, then, let's take Pharo-Core and Pharo.
+1
--
Serge Stinckwich
IRD - UR 079 Geodes, MSI Team, Hanoi, Vietnam
Smalltalkers do: [:it | All with: Class, (And love: it)]
http://doesnotunderstand.org/
__
Excellent David,
Alexandre
On 29 Oct 2008, at 17:38, David Röthlisberger wrote:
Are you updating loadSuperOB? Or shall I do it?
I'm just right now in the process of doing it. ;)
There is ScriptLoader-DavidRoethlisberger.594 in PharoInbox
providing a working version of #loadSuperOB and a
Maybe some comment using "..." are present in the code that is ignored
for some reason from the compiler.
Cheers,
Alexandre
On 3 Nov 2008, at 19:16, Michael Roberts wrote:
-9 lines? did I read that right?
Mike
___
Pharo-project mailing list
Pha
-9 lines? did I read that right?
Mike
___
Pharo-project mailing list
Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
Adrian Lienhard ha scritto:
On Nov 3, 2008, at 10:55 , Serge Stinckwich wrote:
Why not Pharo-stable and Pharo-unstable ?
because there exists a stable CORE too. Changes are done on the core and
from this the IDE is then built.
I hope this helps to explain the rationale behind the suggeste
I like that, too :)DoruOn Nov 3, 2008, at 5:32 PM, Adrian Lienhard wrote:ok, then, let's take Pharo-Core and Pharo.AdrianOn Nov 3, 2008, at 17:07 , Ramon Leon wrote:Marcus Denker wrote:I vote for Pharo-Core and Pharo.+0.9Pharo-Core and Pharo-Dev (+0.1)MichaelDitto, I like Core and Dev better, but P
http://www.ohloh.net/projects/linux/analyses/latest
___
Pharo-project mailing list
Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
ok, then, let's take Pharo-Core and Pharo.
Adrian
On Nov 3, 2008, at 17:07 , Ramon Leon wrote:
Marcus Denker wrote:
I vote for Pharo-Core and Pharo.
+0.9
Pharo-Core and Pharo-Dev (+0.1)
Michael
Ditto, I like Core and Dev better, but Pharo-Core and Pharo aren't bad
either.
Ramon Leon
h
> Marcus Denker wrote:
>
> > I vote for Pharo-Core and Pharo.
>
> +0.9
>
> Pharo-Core and Pharo-Dev (+0.1)
>
> Michael
Ditto, I like Core and Dev better, but Pharo-Core and Pharo aren't bad
either.
Ramon Leon
http://onsmalltalk.com
___
Pharo-proje
Francois,
Welcome to the list! +1 on the naming scheme.
Bill
Wilhelm K. Schwab, Ph.D.
University of Florida
Department of Anesthesiology
PO Box 100254
Gainesville, FL 32610-0254
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tel: (352) 273-6785
FAX: (352) 392-7029
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 11/03/08 9:56 AM >>>
> Du
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 3:55 PM, Marcus Denker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I vote for Pharo-Core and Pharo.
So do I
--
Damien Cassou
Peter von der Ahé: «I'm beginning to see why Gilad wished us good
luck». (http://blogs.sun.com/ahe/entry/override_snafu)
_
During ESUG, we discussed about that with Marcus. IIRC, he wanted the
current pharo-dev (your Pharo-IDE) to be named just Pharo. The core,
which should only be used by people "knowing what they do" would be
named Pharo-core.
I agree, in my humble opinion it seems to be the best choice.
Francoi
Marcus Denker wrote:
I vote for Pharo-Core and Pharo.
+0.9
Pharo-Core and Pharo-Dev (+0.1)
Michael
___
Pharo-project mailing list
Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
On 03.11.2008, at 15:52, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
Why not to have Pharo-standard and Pharo-Enterprise ?
The idea is that the version *with* the tools is the standard. Not
the one without. ;-)
What about Pharo-minimal and Pharo-enterprise?
I vote for Pharo-Core and Pharo.
Marcu
Why not to have Pharo-standard and Pharo-Enterprise ?
The idea is that the version *with* the tools is the standard. Not
the one without. ;-)
What about Pharo-minimal and Pharo-enterprise?
Cheers,
Alexandre
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.
On 03.11.2008, at 15:44, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
Yes good idea, to have 2 differents names, but why Pharo-IDE ? There
is no IDE in the core version ?
There is only a minimal one, and it will be further reduced in the
future. So, for real work, it is suggested to use the "IDE" image,
which
Yes good idea, to have 2 differents names, but why Pharo-IDE ? There
is no IDE in the core version ?
There is only a minimal one, and it will be further reduced in the
future. So, for real work, it is suggested to use the "IDE" image,
which includes all the productivity tools like autocomple
http://www.nwiresoftware.com/
screencast:
http://www.nwiresoftware.com/sites/nwiresoftware.com/video.php?file=/sites/nwiresoftware.com/files/video/nwire-intro.flv
--
Damien Cassou
Peter von der Ahé: «I'm beginning to see why Gilad wished us good
luck». (http://blogs.sun.com/ahe/entry/override_s
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 10:49 AM, Adrian Lienhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Concerning terminology, I suggest to name the official Pharo image, which
> will be packaged as a one-click image, "Pharo-IDE". And the one where the
> actual development of Pharo takes place is named Pharo-CORE. Using DE
Hi Adrian,
Adrian Lienhard wrote:
Concerning terminology, I suggest to name the official Pharo image,
which will be packaged as a one-click image, "Pharo-IDE". And the one
where the actual development of Pharo takes place is named Pharo-CORE.
Using DEV is ambiguous because its not clear wheth
Hi,
This is the issue 129
Cheers,
Gwenael
On 11/1/08 9:42 PM, Adrian Lienhard wrote:
Hi Gwenael,
In PharoInbox there is the following slice, but I don't know which issue
it corresponds to (please always add the issue number in the slice
comment or file name)?
Cheers,
Adrian
Name: SLICE-Obj
On Nov 3, 2008, at 10:55 , Serge Stinckwich wrote:
2008/11/3 Adrian Lienhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
thanks, I forgot to list the one-click image. I added the plan to
http://code.google.com/p/pharo/wiki/Milestones
Concerning terminology, I suggest to name the official Pharo image,
which
will be
I suggest to have at least one next image - without everything what can be
safely unloaded. For the next cleaning and shrinking purposes.
Of course if you want to have similar sequence of automatically build images
like the KernelImage.
-- Pavel
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 10:49 AM, Adrian Lienhard <[
On 03.11.2008, at 10:55, Serge Stinckwich wrote:
2008/11/3 Adrian Lienhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
thanks, I forgot to list the one-click image. I added the plan to
http://code.google.com/p/pharo/wiki/Milestones
Concerning terminology, I suggest to name the official Pharo image,
which
will be
2008/11/3 Adrian Lienhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> thanks, I forgot to list the one-click image. I added the plan to
> http://code.google.com/p/pharo/wiki/Milestones
>
> Concerning terminology, I suggest to name the official Pharo image, which
> will be packaged as a one-click image, "Pharo-IDE". And
thanks, I forgot to list the one-click image. I added the plan to
http://code.google.com/p/pharo/wiki/Milestones
Concerning terminology, I suggest to name the official Pharo image,
which will be packaged as a one-click image, "Pharo-IDE". And the one
where the actual development of Pharo tak
On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 3:16 PM, Stéphane Ducasse
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> - hex removal (I do not remember why we removed it).
Might be related to http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=115
--
Damien Cassou
Peter von der Ahé: «I'm beginning to see why Gilad wished us good
luck». (h
On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 1:02 PM, Adrian Lienhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there anything important we missed? Any suggestions?
- review pharo-dev images and make comments so that the official Pharo
image contains some dev tools and pharo-dev becomes useless.
--
Damien Cassou
Peter von der
29 matches
Mail list logo
