Re: [Pharo-project] shout for pharo 1.2: Please help.

2011-02-27 Thread laurent laffont
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 8:40 AM, Dale Henrichs wrote: > Pharo 1.0-beta2 _is_ loading Shout 1.2.2 ... that's the one without > ShoutWorkspace, which I think is correct ... so ProfStef is okay ... > > BTW, validation doesn't check whether versions match or not ... if Shout > had a symbolic version

Re: [Pharo-project] shout for pharo 1.2: Please help.

2011-02-27 Thread Dale Henrichs
Pharo 1.0-beta2 _is_ loading Shout 1.2.2 ... that's the one without ShoutWorkspace, which I think is correct ... so ProfStef is okay ... BTW, validation doesn't check whether versions match or not ... if Shout had a symbolic version defined for Pharo1.2, then I would say that you should use #st

Re: [Pharo-project] Azul Pauseless GC

2011-02-27 Thread Stefan Marr
Hi Andres: On 28 Feb 2011, at 08:01, Andres Valloud wrote: > FWIW, the "pauseless" feature of the algorithm sounds very close (if not > exactly) like VisualWorks' incremental GC, modulo the multithreading. Is VisualWorks' GC documented somewhere? However, you might want to read the VEE'05 paper

Re: [Pharo-project] shout for pharo 1.2: Please help.

2011-02-27 Thread laurent laffont
Hi, I've remembered that ProfStef has a dependency on Shout. In version 1.6 (current stable) I have: spec for: #pharo do: [ spec project: 'Shout' with: '1.2.2'; can it be a problem ? If I remove it Metacello validator raises a critical warning. Laurent On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 8:07 AM, Stéph

Re: [Pharo-project] Azul Pauseless GC

2011-02-27 Thread Andres Valloud
FWIW, the "pauseless" feature of the algorithm sounds very close (if not exactly) like VisualWorks' incremental GC, modulo the multithreading. On 2/26/11 9:46 , Stéphane Ducasse wrote: Thanks damien for the link :) Begin forwarded message: Nice explanation of the Azul Pauseless GC (easier th

Re: [Pharo-project] shout for pharo 1.2: Please help.

2011-02-27 Thread Stéphane Ducasse
Yes but pharo was still loading the version 1.2.1 So normally the latest configurationOfPharo and shout are fixed and working. Can you confirm that? Stef On Feb 28, 2011, at 5:30 AM, Francisco Ortiz Peñaloza wrote: > Hi Stef don't know if you already solve this, i created a 1.2.2 > version of Con

Re: [Pharo-project] [update 1.2] #12339

2011-02-27 Thread Stéphane Ducasse
How do you update? Because I took 12339 and loaded ConfigurationOfShout and it works I did the same with configurationOfPhaor and it works. > Hi, > > after updating to this version, Shout starts to fail sendind DNU > everywere. One of the things i detect was this update loads in my > image a Sho

Re: [Pharo-project] Metacello Configuration Pharo1.2 solo sprint ... status

2011-02-27 Thread Dale Henrichs
I've just finished copying the cleaned up configurations up to MetacelloRepository. All of the configurations that are referenced in ConfigurationOfPharo validate clean ... I loaded the config into a PHaroCore image, but had a number of failed tests, but I am running on a mac and I seem to re

Re: [Pharo-project] comments comments comments again

2011-02-27 Thread Eliot Miranda
Hi Stéph, why not implement a tool that takes a package, asks the user to identify the most important class comment, and the creates comments for all uncommented classes in the package that direct the user to the most important class comment? The generated comment could use the squeak code hy

Re: [Pharo-project] shout for pharo 1.2: Please help.

2011-02-27 Thread Francisco Ortiz Peñaloza
Hi Stef don't know if you already solve this, i created a 1.2.2 version of ConfigurationOfShout referencing some changes i made to shout to work with Editor changes. There're like five new versions since that and it's currently working with PharoCore 1.2 cause i tested a lot :) Cheers, Francisco

Re: [Pharo-project] [update 1.2] #12339

2011-02-27 Thread Francisco Ortiz Peñaloza
Hi, after updating to this version, Shout starts to fail sendind DNU everywere. One of the things i detect was this update loads in my image a Shout package signed markus.denker.1... Is there a way to see what're the changes on an update? Thanks, Francisco On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 11:49 AM, Marc

Re: [Pharo-project] Which calendar does Pharo officially use?

2011-02-27 Thread DougEdmunds
Found my answer in the ANSI standard (1998) at 5.8.1 http://wiki.squeak.org/squeak/uploads/172/standard_v1_9-indexed.pdf -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Which-calendar-does-Pharo-officially-use-tp3323638p3327447.html Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at N

Re: [Pharo-project] About 1.2

2011-02-27 Thread Dale Henrichs
I saw your changes and they did appear to be consistent with the changes I had made ... Dale On Feb 27, 2011, at 1:56 PM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote: > I think that I fixed the issue with Shout. > I'm trying to load Pharo configuration now :( > > Stef > >>> >>> >>> >>> How can XML in 1.2 impac

Re: [Pharo-project] Gaelli vs. Galli??

2011-02-27 Thread Alexandre Bergel
Same guy. "ae" and "ä" are the character Alexandre Le 27 févr. 2011 à 21:32, "Schwab,Wilhelm K" a écrit : > Are Gaelli and Galli the same person? If so, is there a typo, or is it > simply that the name does not translate easily? > > [5] M. Gaelli, O. Nierstrasz, and S. Ducasse. One-method

Re: [Pharo-project] Gaelli vs. Galli??

2011-02-27 Thread Serge Stinckwich
Yes same guy. On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 7:32 AM, Schwab,Wilhelm K wrote: > Are Gaelli and Galli the same person?  If so, is there a typo, or is it > simply that the name does not translate easily? > > [5] M. Gaelli, O. Nierstrasz, and S. Ducasse. One-method commands: Linking > methods and their te

Re: [Pharo-project] introducing RPackage :)

2011-02-27 Thread Carla F. Griggio
I'll try it with smallUML, it would be great to link diagrams to a package instead of a special class like it's done now :) On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 6:07 PM, jannik.laval wrote: > Hi, > > There is also a nighty build in hudson server. > > Cheers, > Jannik > > On Feb 26, 2011, at 21:48 , Stéphane D

[Pharo-project] Gaelli vs. Galli??

2011-02-27 Thread Schwab,Wilhelm K
Are Gaelli and Galli the same person? If so, is there a typo, or is it simply that the name does not translate easily? [5] M. Gaelli, O. Nierstrasz, and S. Ducasse. One-method commands: Linking methods and their tests. In OOPSLA Workshop on Revival of Dynamic Languages. Citeseer, 2004. [6] M. G

Re: [Pharo-project] Good reference on time on unit testing?

2011-02-27 Thread Norbert Hartl
On 27.02.2011, at 23:19, Schwab,Wilhelm K wrote: > Norbert, > > Have you ever read of shops where people throw code at features and never > much bother to test what they are doing, because it is "testing's" job to > catch the bugs ? I had read about it too... > Yes, I did. Nearly all of the

Re: [Pharo-project] Good reference on time on unit testing?

2011-02-27 Thread Schwab,Wilhelm K
Great, an idealist :) In this case, the problem is flipped: they want tests, but expect that a hurried effort will fix all of their problems. From: pharo-project-boun...@lists.gforge.inria.fr [pharo-project-boun...@lists.gforge.inria.fr] On Behalf Of St

Re: [Pharo-project] Good reference on time on unit testing?

2011-02-27 Thread Schwab,Wilhelm K
Let's keep the physical descriptions out of it, ok :) But you have the point: I am looking for published numbers to back up what we all have learned from experience. And it has been surprisingly hard to find. From: pharo-project-boun...@lists.gforge.in

Re: [Pharo-project] Good reference on time on unit testing?

2011-02-27 Thread Schwab,Wilhelm K
Steven, Maybe we all should take some cold meds - you seem very coherent to me; get well soon. The only thing is that after settling on the shorter time to completion, you still spend a fraction of your programming effort/time to get the computer to test your work. It is that fraction that I

Re: [Pharo-project] Issue 2820 in pharo: Format Source shortcut key (cmd-r) doesn't work

2011-02-27 Thread pharo
Comment #4 on issue 2820 by marcus.d...@gmail.com: Format Source shortcut key (cmd-r) doesn't work http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=2820 Eclipse is free to you, but IBM invested >30 million USD before the first release was made public. It is really difficult to get details

Re: [Pharo-project] Good reference on time on unit testing?

2011-02-27 Thread Schwab,Wilhelm K
Norbert, Have you ever read of shops where people throw code at features and never much bother to test what they are doing, because it is "testing's" job to catch the bugs ? I had read about it too... I understand what you are saying. Bill From: pha

Re: [Pharo-project] Issue 2820 in pharo: Format Source shortcut key (cmd-r) doesn't work

2011-02-27 Thread pharo
Comment #3 on issue 2820 by intrader.intrader: Format Source shortcut key (cmd-r) doesn't work http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=2820 Release testing is not up to snuff. It is very difficult to use tutorial as nobody bothers to update them to the 'newest' pharo or seaside. The

Re: [Pharo-project] About 1.2

2011-02-27 Thread Stéphane Ducasse
I think that I fixed the issue with Shout. I'm trying to load Pharo configuration now :( Stef >> >> >> >> How can XML in 1.2 impacts 1.1 ??? >> >> > It's not XML, there is another problem. > > Status: > => 1.2 now builds, without Mocketry. But that has been fixed in the > meanti

Re: [Pharo-project] [COTDC] 20 - Loader

2011-02-27 Thread Stéphane Ducasse
On Feb 27, 2011, at 10:51 PM, Noury Bouraqadi wrote: > I collect some infos about package and system (versions, dirty). > I'm an abstract class. > currentChangedPackages instance method and currentMajorVersionNumber class > are missing are provided by my wellknown subclass ScriptLoader. > > I w

Re: [Pharo-project] [COTDC] 20 - Loader

2011-02-27 Thread Noury Bouraqadi
I collect some infos about package and system (versions, dirty). I'm an abstract class. currentChangedPackages instance method and currentMajorVersionNumber class are missing are provided by my wellknown subclass ScriptLoader. I wonder if some refactoring need to be done here... On 27 févr. 201

Re: [Pharo-project] comments comments comments again

2011-02-27 Thread Mariano Martinez Peck
On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 10:03 PM, Francois Stephany < tulipe.mouta...@gmail.com> wrote: > I find it frustrating to load a package and to have no clue where to start. > The user must scan the classes and guess which one are 'entry points'. Class > comments does not help there. > > For a user perspe

Re: [Pharo-project] shout for pharo 1.2: Please help.

2011-02-27 Thread Stéphane Ducasse
Ok For me I just wanted to check if I can load shout. Now it is just breaking on Dev Toolset>> SHWorkspace open. I still do not understand how the correct version of shout was loaded before. Since Pharo was referencing 1.2.1 which was referencing ja

Re: [Pharo-project] comments comments comments again

2011-02-27 Thread Francois Stephany
I find it frustrating to load a package and to have no clue where to start. The user must scan the classes and guess which one are 'entry points'. Class comments does not help there. For a user perspective I would prefer to have a HelpSystem indicating where to start. Now I guess class comment

Re: [Pharo-project] Good reference on time on unit testing?

2011-02-27 Thread Steven Baker
Oh! I never worry about "proving" it. When I've worked for clients who have insisted that I leave the testing out because they don't want to "pay extra" for the time spent, I simply don't push the tests to their repo. I test for myself, because I have a personal commitment to do the best job poss

Re: [Pharo-project] Good reference on time on unit testing?

2011-02-27 Thread Peter Hugosson-Miller
Steven, you're making perfect sense to me, and I think almost everyone here agrees with you. Bill's problem (if I've understood him correctly) is that he needs to convince some pointy-haired-boss-type person, by directing him or her to a well-respected "official" statistic that "proves" what we al

Re: [Pharo-project] Good reference on time on unit testing?

2011-02-27 Thread Steven Baker
I've always felt that "test driving" code actually results in negative time spent on "testing". I spend (and everyone I know that tests well does as well) a lot less time writing code test-first than I ever would writing the same code without the tests first. Also, I spend far less time (almost non

Re: [Pharo-project] Good reference on time on unit testing?

2011-02-27 Thread Norbert Hartl
On 27.02.2011, at 13:58, Schwab,Wilhelm K wrote: > Norbert, > > Excellent points - I take exception with only one: you assume that all > developers test - that is sadly not true. I am involved with a group who > seem to think that a handful of tests added at the last minute will somehow > ma

Re: [Pharo-project] Good reference on time on unit testing?

2011-02-27 Thread Schwab,Wilhelm K
Cesar, Alexandre, Thanks. Bill From: pharo-project-boun...@lists.gforge.inria.fr [pharo-project-boun...@lists.gforge.inria.fr] On Behalf Of csra...@bol.com.br [csra...@bol.com.br] Sent: Sunday, February 27, 2011 2:24 PM To: Pharo-project@lists.gforge.

[Pharo-project] [COTDC] 20 - Loader

2011-02-27 Thread laurent laffont
Today: Loader Comment Of The Day Contest - One Day One Comment Rules: #1: Each day a not commented class is elected. Each day the best comment will be integrated with name of the author(s). #2: If you cannot comment it, deprecate it. Results: http://code.google.com/p/pharo/wiki/CommentOfTheDayC

Re: [Pharo-project] Good reference on time on unit testing?

2011-02-27 Thread csrabak
Yes, thus for Bill this mean that for amount of time already expended you need about the same amount for writing tests. YMMV if the cyclomatic complexity (or similar metric) is higher of lower than 'average' programs. In a more commercial scenario, you can cite Gartner's Research Note SPA-19-35

Re: [Pharo-project] comments comments comments again

2011-02-27 Thread Mariano Martinez Peck
On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 4:18 PM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote: > Hi > > why can we put comment in class comment? > For example I worked on fixing 1.2 and now I want to execute the > configurationOfPharo and no magic invocation > JUST A FUCKING EMPTY class comment as usual. > > > So again I feel lik

Re: [Pharo-project] 1.2 one-click OSX and Linux: more failing tests

2011-02-27 Thread laurent laffont
1.2 one-click on (Arch) Linux (build #160) there's errors too (see below). So I wonder which VM is used in Hudson ? 10773 run, 10669 passes, 69 expected failures, 6 failures, 29 errors, 0 unexpected passes Failures: FileDirectoryTest>>#testRecursiveMatching ProcessSpecificTest>>#testDynamicVariabl

Re: [Pharo-project] we cannot add attachment anymore on the bug tracker

2011-02-27 Thread Miguel Cobá
El dom, 27-02-2011 a las 12:02 +0100, Norbert Hartl escribió: > > On 26.02.2011, at 18:55, Stéphane Ducasse wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Redmine (http://www.redmine.org/) supports sub-projects. Or maybe > > > https://www.chiliproject.org/ (a fork of redmine). > > > > Does anybody has experience

Re: [Pharo-project] shout for pharo 1.2: Please help.

2011-02-27 Thread Dale Henrichs
So Stef, I looked at ConfigurationOfPharo-StephaneDucasse.139 and I noticed that you commented out some package specs for 1.2-beta2 ... you need to be aware that commenting them out does not prevent those packages from being loaded To make structural changes you need to remove the packag

[Pharo-project] 1.2 one-click OSX: more failing tests

2011-02-27 Thread laurent laffont
I take the last 1.2 one-click on OSX (build #160), run all tests. => tests don't finish because of SocketStreamTest>>#testUpToAfterCloseNonSignaling which wait infinitely (however, if you run only SocketStreamTests it works). So I deselect SocketStreamTests and run again. Result: 10743 run, 1

Re: [Pharo-project] Good reference on time on unit testing?

2011-02-27 Thread laurent laffont
On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 5:35 PM, Schwab,Wilhelm K wrote: > Laurent, > > *I* get it - my audience does not. > :) What I've learned: - people think it will take time to write tests because they don't know what is testing, they don't know what is TDD, because it's hard (yes, it's hard). - showing

Re: [Pharo-project] Good reference on time on unit testing?

2011-02-27 Thread Schwab,Wilhelm K
I've asked the question three times because people seem to be trying to convince me (I'm on your side of this) rather than my audience. Your idea of how much test code gets written would be a fine answer to have. One of the points I am going to make in the presentation is that tests are code t

Re: [Pharo-project] Good reference on time on unit testing?

2011-02-27 Thread Schwab,Wilhelm K
Sure. But the audience is a group that bangs out code and then fixes it later; I am trying to help them past that, and something quantitative in an ACM or IEEE journal would be harder to shoot down that our advice, not matter how correct it might be.

Re: [Pharo-project] shout for pharo 1.2: Please help.

2011-02-27 Thread Stéphane Ducasse
Ok I do not understand how it loaded before because I got a duplicate instance warning raised (even if the class loaded was empty - I do not get it) So I remove the empty package, fixing the version and the baseline... Now I have the decompiler popping windows proble

Re: [Pharo-project] Issue 3764 in pharo: Test runner: file out results sometimes disabled even with existing failures / errors.

2011-02-27 Thread pharo
Updates: Status: FixProposed Comment #1 on issue 3764 by laurent@gmail.com: Test runner: file out results sometimes disabled even with existing failures / errors. http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3764 in Inbox: SLICE-Issue-3764-Test-runner-file-out-results-sometim

Re: [Pharo-project] Good reference on time on unit testing?

2011-02-27 Thread Ramon Leon
On 02/27/2011 06:12 AM, Schwab,Wilhelm K wrote: Understood. But, doing it correctly, how much of your time do you spend on the test writing/maintenance side? Far less time than you'll spend manually testing over the course of writing and maintaining the program. You can't avoid testing, nor

[Pharo-project] Issue 3764 in pharo: Test runner: file out results sometimes disabled even with existing failures / errors.

2011-02-27 Thread pharo
Status: Accepted Owner: laurent@gmail.com New issue 3764 by laurent@gmail.com: Test runner: file out results sometimes disabled even with existing failures / errors. http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3764 in 1.2 Fix coming.

Re: [Pharo-project] Good reference on time on unit testing?

2011-02-27 Thread Yanni Chiu
On 27/02/11 7:58 AM, Schwab,Wilhelm K wrote: I have no problem arguing that testing (if done well) can/will reduce overall development time; the question is how much of that time one should expect to devote to writing and maintaining unit and acceptance tests? You've asked the question for the

Re: [Pharo-project] comments comments comments again

2011-02-27 Thread Stéphane Ducasse
Thanks dale. Stef > Since I have edited ConfigurationOfPharo I can add an appropriate comment ... > I will add comments to the other configurations as well ... > > Dale > > On Feb 27, 2011, at 7:18 AM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote: > >> Hi >> >> why can we put comment in class comment? >> For exam

Re: [Pharo-project] shout for pharo 1.2: Please help.

2011-02-27 Thread Dale Henrichs
Stef, I will try to take a look at your issue today along with testing out the configuration fixes I have pending ... both Pharo and Shout had configuration issues, but I can't say that your particular issue is related ... yet. Dale On Feb 27, 2011, at 7:57 AM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote: > Hi gu

Re: [Pharo-project] comments comments comments again

2011-02-27 Thread Dale Henrichs
Since I have edited ConfigurationOfPharo I can add an appropriate comment ... I will add comments to the other configurations as well ... Dale On Feb 27, 2011, at 7:18 AM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote: > Hi > > why can we put comment in class comment? > For example I worked on fixing 1.2 and now I w

[Pharo-project] shout for pharo 1.2: Please help.

2011-02-27 Thread Stéphane Ducasse
Hi guys I modified version 1.2.1 of ConfigurationOfShout to load my version Shout-sd.101 (apparently lot of comments were removed between Benjamin.100 and Benjamin.101 - strange) In ConfigurationOfPharo there is project: 'Shout' with: '1.2.1'; Now in ConfigurationOfShout th

Re: [Pharo-project] Good reference on time on unit testing?

2011-02-27 Thread laurent laffont
On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 2:12 PM, Schwab,Wilhelm K wrote: > Understood. But, doing it correctly, how much of your time do you spend on > the test writing/maintenance side? None. Seriously none. I never pause and say "OK now it's time to write tests and maintain existing ones". It's part of the T

[Pharo-project] comments comments comments again

2011-02-27 Thread Stéphane Ducasse
Hi why can we put comment in class comment? For example I worked on fixing 1.2 and now I want to execute the configurationOfPharo and no magic invocation JUST A FUCKING EMPTY class comment as usual. So again I feel like an idiot and I'm trying in the dark. You have NOT A SINGLE REASON NOT

Re: [Pharo-project] Issue 3707 in pharo: Syntax highlighting looks strange

2011-02-27 Thread pharo
Comment #23 on issue 3707 by tudor.gi...@gmail.com: Syntax highlighting looks strange http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3707 I copied the latest Glamour-Morphic-Theme in PharoInbox. In there you have the method: GLMUITheme class>>setPreferredShoutColors that has the set of col

Re: [Pharo-project] Issue 3707 in pharo: Syntax highlighting looks strange

2011-02-27 Thread pharo
Updates: Status: Closed Comment #22 on issue 3707 by stephane...@gmail.com: Syntax highlighting looks strange http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3707 I fixed the configurationOfShout and configurationOfPharo. Now I will try to load that.

Re: [Pharo-project] Issue 3707 in pharo: Syntax highlighting looks strange

2011-02-27 Thread pharo
Comment #21 on issue 3707 by stephane...@gmail.com: Syntax highlighting looks strange http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3707 I published a new version in shout. Now I'm looking at the configuration. to see if it should be updated. So we can close this issue.

Re: [Pharo-project] Issue 3707 in pharo: Syntax highlighting looks strange

2011-02-27 Thread pharo
Comment #20 on issue 3707 by stephane...@gmail.com: Syntax highlighting looks strange http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3707 Ok I found it. SHTextStylerST80 initialize should be done after reverting the style.

Re: [Pharo-project] Issue 3707 in pharo: Syntax highlighting looks strange

2011-02-27 Thread pharo
Comment #19 on issue 3707 by stephane...@gmail.com: Syntax highlighting looks strange http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3707 so from which image do you have something ok so that I copy it? Because else this is boring try and error.

Re: [Pharo-project] Issue 3707 in pharo: Syntax highlighting looks strange

2011-02-27 Thread pharo
Comment #18 on issue 3707 by stephane...@gmail.com: Syntax highlighting looks strange http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3707 but I'm not experimenting. Reverting to the one of 1.1 does not remove the bold!

Re: [Pharo-project] Issue 3707 in pharo: Syntax highlighting looks strange

2011-02-27 Thread pharo
Comment #17 on issue 3707 by marcus.d...@gmail.com: Syntax highlighting looks strange http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3707 Not only the bold. Just revert to the 1.1 style. Let's then experiment in 1.3

Re: [Pharo-project] Issue 3707 in pharo: Syntax highlighting looks strange

2011-02-27 Thread pharo
Comment #16 on issue 3707 by stephane...@gmail.com: Syntax highlighting looks strange http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3707 Ok I will remove the bold and we can integrate it.

Re: [Pharo-project] Fwd: [ANN] pharo focused sprint - bern, feb 26

2011-02-27 Thread Tudor Girba
Hi, On 27 Feb 2011, at 12:04, Stéphane Ducasse wrote: - Lukas went over the WeakAnnouncements implementation to get the WeakMessageSend working. The code is in PharoTaskForces >>> >>> should we take action on this one? >>> I mean integrating it. >> >> It can be integrated, because th

Re: [Pharo-project] Good reference on time on unit testing?

2011-02-27 Thread Alexandre Bergel
Robert Martin said in his book that one should spend ~50% of its time writing tests. Cheers, Alexandre On 27 Feb 2011, at 00:52, Schwab,Wilhelm K wrote: > Hello all, > > Can anyone recommend a good reference on the amount of time one should expect > to spend writing tests? I will have to be

[Pharo-project] [update 1.1] #11421

2011-02-27 Thread Marcus Denker
11421 - Issue 3575:[Failing Tests] Obsolete classes after tests (workaround) -- Marcus Denker -- http://www.marcusdenker.de INRIA Lille -- Nord Europe. Team RMoD.

Re: [Pharo-project] Issue 3575 in pharo: [Failing Tests] Obsolete classes after tests

2011-02-27 Thread pharo
Updates: Labels: -Milestone-1.1.2-DevImage Comment #10 on issue 3575 by marcus.d...@gmail.com: [Failing Tests] Obsolete classes after tests http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3575 in 11421

Re: [Pharo-project] Issue 3575 in pharo: [Failing Tests] Obsolete classes after tests

2011-02-27 Thread pharo
Updates: Labels: -Milestone-1.2-DevImage Comment #9 on issue 3575 by marcus.d...@gmail.com: [Failing Tests] Obsolete classes after tests http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3575 in 12339

[Pharo-project] [update 1.2] #12339

2011-02-27 Thread Marcus Denker
12339 - Issue 3575: [Failing Tests] Obsolete classes after tests (workaround) -- Marcus Denker -- http://www.marcusdenker.de INRIA Lille -- Nord Europe. Team RMoD.

Re: [Pharo-project] Issue 3620 in pharo: Settings: OCompletion settings appear twice

2011-02-27 Thread pharo
Updates: Status: Accepted Comment #11 on issue 3620 by marcus.d...@gmail.com: Settings: OCompletion settings appear twice http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3620 So what is the *simplest* *easiest* workaround for this so that we can actually release 1.2?

Re: [Pharo-project] Issue 3484 in pharo: Windows VM in One click image for 1.2 not yet customized

2011-02-27 Thread pharo
Updates: Status: Duplicate Mergedinto: 3645 Comment #7 on issue 3484 by marcus.d...@gmail.com: Windows VM in One click image for 1.2 not yet customized http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3484 (No comment was entered for this change.)

Re: [Pharo-project] Issue 3645 in pharo: Update Hudson One-Click build files for 1.2

2011-02-27 Thread pharo
Updates: Cc: marcus.denker stephane.ducasse Comment #3 on issue 3645 by marcus.d...@gmail.com: Update Hudson One-Click build files for 1.2 http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3645 Issue 3484 has been merged into this issue.

Re: [Pharo-project] Good reference on time on unit testing?

2011-02-27 Thread Schwab,Wilhelm K
Understood. But, doing it correctly, how much of your time do you spend on the test writing/maintenance side? I found some blog posts, but I was hoping for some peer-reviewed papers that go on the record. I am trying to make the point you are making, and it will go over better if I can point

Re: [Pharo-project] Issue 3575 in pharo: [Failing Tests] Obsolete classes after tests

2011-02-27 Thread pharo
Comment #8 on issue 3575 by marcus.d...@gmail.com: [Failing Tests] Obsolete classes after tests http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3575 As this just happens after running all tests, I propose to remove the Obselete classes test in 1.1 and 1.2 and move the problem to be fixed in

Re: [Pharo-project] Issue 3707 in pharo: Syntax highlighting looks strange

2011-02-27 Thread pharo
Updates: Status: FixProposed Comment #15 on issue 3707 by marcus.d...@gmail.com: Syntax highlighting looks strange http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3707 (No comment was entered for this change.)

Re: [Pharo-project] Issue 3732 in pharo: default omni browser size bigger

2011-02-27 Thread pharo
Updates: Status: FixProposed Comment #1 on issue 3732 by marcus.d...@gmail.com: default omni browser size bigger http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3732 fix attached. This just makes the window minmally as big as the standard browser Attachments: OBBrowser-initi

Re: [Pharo-project] Good reference on time on unit testing?

2011-02-27 Thread Schwab,Wilhelm K
Norbert, Excellent points - I take exception with only one: you assume that all developers test - that is sadly not true. I am involved with a group who seem to think that a handful of tests added at the last minute will somehow magically fix their problems. I have no problem arguing that t

Re: [Pharo-project] seaside.gemstone.com down?

2011-02-27 Thread Marcus Denker
On Feb 27, 2011, at 1:35 PM, Tobias Pape wrote: > Am 2011-02-27 um 13:16 schrieb Marcus Denker: >> Hi, >> >> I tried to load the glamour based tools: >> >> Gofer new squeaksource: 'glamoroust'; package: 'ConfigurationOfGlamoroust'; >> load. >> (Smalltalk at: #ConfigurationOfGlamoroust) perform

Re: [Pharo-project] seaside.gemstone.com down?

2011-02-27 Thread Tobias Pape
Am 2011-02-27 um 13:16 schrieb Marcus Denker: > Hi, > > I tried to load the glamour based tools: > > Gofer new squeaksource: 'glamoroust'; package: 'ConfigurationOfGlamoroust'; > load. > (Smalltalk at: #ConfigurationOfGlamoroust) perform: #loadDefault. > > And got this error: > > NameLookupFai

[Pharo-project] seaside.gemstone.com down?

2011-02-27 Thread Marcus Denker
Hi, I tried to load the glamour based tools: Gofer new squeaksource: 'glamoroust'; package: 'ConfigurationOfGlamoroust'; load. (Smalltalk at: #ConfigurationOfGlamoroust) perform: #loadDefault. And got this error: NameLookupFailure: Could not resolve the server named: seaside.gemstone.com (Gof

Re: [Pharo-project] About 1.2

2011-02-27 Thread Marcus Denker
On Feb 27, 2011, at 9:11 AM, laurent laffont wrote: > > > > How can XML in 1.2 impacts 1.1 ??? > > It's not XML, there is another problem. Status: => 1.2 now builds, without Mocketry. But that has been fixed in the meantime, so we can add it back. (it seems removi

Re: [Pharo-project] Issue 3575 in pharo: [Failing Tests] Obsolete classes after tests

2011-02-27 Thread pharo
Comment #7 on issue 3575 by m...@mjr104.co.uk: [Failing Tests] Obsolete classes after tests http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3575 Hi, some of the obsolete classes are being held onto by Tools->Recent Messages. Look at the bottom of the list.

Re: [Pharo-project] Fwd: [ANN] pharo focused sprint - bern, feb 26

2011-02-27 Thread Stéphane Ducasse
>>> - Lukas went over the WeakAnnouncements implementation to get the >>> WeakMessageSend working. The code is in PharoTaskForces >> >> should we take action on this one? >> I mean integrating it. > > It can be integrated, because the base code works in the same way as before. > > Currently, th

Re: [Pharo-project] we cannot add attachment anymore on the bug tracker

2011-02-27 Thread Norbert Hartl
On 26.02.2011, at 18:55, Stéphane Ducasse wrote: >> >> >> Redmine (http://www.redmine.org/) supports sub-projects. Or maybe >> https://www.chiliproject.org/ (a fork of redmine). > > Does anybody has experience with them? > It would be good to be able to play with them. I just want to ask if

Re: [Pharo-project] Good reference on time on unit testing?

2011-02-27 Thread Norbert Hartl
Hi, On 27.02.2011, at 04:52, Schwab,Wilhelm K wrote: > Hello all, > > Can anyone recommend a good reference on the amount of time one should expect > to spend writing tests? I will have to be the messenger (will be wearing > running shoes just in case...), but I want the message to come from

Re: [Pharo-project] [ANN] More on Keymappings

2011-02-27 Thread Tudor Girba
I also I cannot load Keymapping 1.5 in Pharo 1.2. I get DNU for Character>>+. This is due to an initialization in KMKeyEvent (see the attached debug log). I did the followings: Gofer it squeaksource: 'Keymapping'; package: 'ConfigurationOfKeymapping'; load. (ConfigurationOfKeymapping project ver

Re: [Pharo-project] Fwd: [ANN] pharo focused sprint - bern, feb 26

2011-02-27 Thread Tudor Girba
Hi, On 27 Feb 2011, at 08:58, Stéphane Ducasse wrote: >> ... >> - Lukas went over the WeakAnnouncements implementation to get the >> WeakMessageSend working. The code is in PharoTaskForces > > should we take action on this one? > I mean integrating it. It can be integrated, because the base c

Re: [Pharo-project] About 1.2

2011-02-27 Thread laurent laffont
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 9:50 PM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote: > Hi guys > > 1.2 should go out. Marcus and me should spend their time on 1.3, OPAL and > the rest. > Yes Now for PharoDev we want to remove packages that are not about tools. > If you want XML, openDBX... help us using Metacello to buil

Re: [Pharo-project] About 1.2

2011-02-27 Thread Stéphane Ducasse
On Feb 27, 2011, at 1:06 AM, Norbert Hartl wrote: > Why do you think the break of 1.1 build is xml related? This is what marcus was saying. May be the configuration did not point to the right version. > To me it appears either a PharoSound or metacello problem. The build is > unable to load

Re: [Pharo-project] About 1.2

2011-02-27 Thread Stéphane Ducasse
Yes we should do that. Now the problem with the xml package is not even that. If we include package like that then for example each time a project like moose which use it wants to use the latest version (it will happen during at least 6 months) then they/we will have a problem because the system