On 3 September 2011 20:43, Nicolas Cellier
wrote:
> 2011/9/3 Frank Shearar :
>> On 3 September 2011 19:35, Nicolas Cellier
>> wrote:
>>> 2011/9/3 Frank Shearar :
On 3 September 2011 18:50, Lukas Renggli wrote:
> I think it is a good idea to have the number parser separate, after
> a
2011/9/3 Frank Shearar :
> On 3 September 2011 19:35, Nicolas Cellier
> wrote:
>> 2011/9/3 Frank Shearar :
>>> On 3 September 2011 18:50, Lukas Renggli wrote:
I think it is a good idea to have the number parser separate, after
all it might also make sense to use it separately.
Hi,
On Sat, Sep 3, 2011 at 9:03 PM, Hernán Morales Durand
wrote:
> Hi Damien
>
> I wanted to see the call stack with a script testHTTPSocket.st:
>
> HTTPSocket
> httpGet: 'http://source.lukas-renggli.ch/petit/?C=M;O=D'
> args: nil
> user: ''
> passwd: ''
it works for
On 3 September 2011 19:35, Nicolas Cellier
wrote:
> 2011/9/3 Frank Shearar :
>> On 3 September 2011 18:50, Lukas Renggli wrote:
>>> I think it is a good idea to have the number parser separate, after
>>> all it might also make sense to use it separately.
>>>
>>> It seems that the new Smalltalk gr
Hi Damien
I wanted to see the call stack with a script testHTTPSocket.st:
HTTPSocket
httpGet: 'http://source.lukas-renggli.ch/petit/?C=M;O=D'
args: nil
user: ''
passwd: ''
without quitting, opened the PharoKernel window (it is minimized in my
WinXP) and in the VM
2011/9/3 Frank Shearar :
> On 3 September 2011 18:50, Lukas Renggli wrote:
>> I think it is a good idea to have the number parser separate, after
>> all it might also make sense to use it separately.
>>
>> It seems that the new Smalltalk grammar is significantly slower. The
>> benchmark PPSmalltal
That sounds like a good plan.
I would expect the PetitParser performance to be slightly slower than
the one of the hand-written number parser. However, I would not expect
a significant performance difference on normal source code where most
tokens are not numbers.
Lukas
On 3 September 2011 20:07
On 3 September 2011 18:50, Lukas Renggli wrote:
> I think it is a good idea to have the number parser separate, after
> all it might also make sense to use it separately.
>
> It seems that the new Smalltalk grammar is significantly slower. The
> benchmark PPSmalltalkClassesTests class>>#benchmark:
I think it is a good idea to have the number parser separate, after
all it might also make sense to use it separately.
It seems that the new Smalltalk grammar is significantly slower. The
benchmark PPSmalltalkClassesTests class>>#benchmark: that uses the
source code of the collection hierarchy and
2011/9/2 Stéphane Ducasse :
>
> On Sep 2, 2011, at 7:16 AM, Hernán Morales Durand wrote:
>
>> Two more:
>>
>> ScriptLoader new installingInstaller
>
> should not work and should not be used.
>
> Nobody should use ScriptLoader :)
>
I know :) just pointing a way to reproduce a possible problem with
On 3 September 2011 15:56, Lukas Renggli wrote:
> On 3 September 2011 16:51, Frank Shearar wrote:
>> Hi Lukas,
>>
>> I haven't :) mainly because I'm unsure where to put it - is there
>> perhaps a PP Inbox, or shall I just post the merged version, or what's
>> your preference? (How about an mcd be
On 3 September 2011 16:51, Frank Shearar wrote:
> Hi Lukas,
>
> I haven't :) mainly because I'm unsure where to put it - is there
> perhaps a PP Inbox, or shall I just post the merged version, or what's
> your preference? (How about an mcd between my merge and PP's head?)
Just put the .mcz at som
Hi Lukas,
I haven't :) mainly because I'm unsure where to put it - is there
perhaps a PP Inbox, or shall I just post the merged version, or what's
your preference? (How about an mcd between my merge and PP's head?)
frank
On 3 September 2011 15:47, Lukas Renggli wrote:
> Hi Frank,
>
> Sounds coo
Hi Frank,
Sounds cool, where did you post your changes?
Lukas
On 3 September 2011 16:40, Frank Shearar wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I branched off PetitSmalltalk-lr.50 and (finally) completed a number
> grammar. I also completed (*) the GNU Smalltalk grammar + parsing,
> which is currently in a separate pa
Hi,
I branched off PetitSmalltalk-lr.50 and (finally) completed a number
grammar. I also completed (*) the GNU Smalltalk grammar + parsing,
which is currently in a separate package.
So, my question: I have a version merging my changes with
PetitSmalltalk-lr.56: shall I submit that (together with
Hi,
Thanks for the interest to the CogDroid alpha. Answering to all questions here.
@Gary: I'm afraid I am almost the one involved with this at the moment
;) I do not have a specific timetable, and my next step is to create
a meaningful tool to make JNI calls to the Java libraries available on
A
On 3 September 2011 12:57, Philippe Marschall wrote:
> On 02.09.2011 17:19, Igor Stasenko wrote:
>> On 2 September 2011 17:27, Philippe Marschall wrote:
>>> On 02.09.2011 15:39, Igor Stasenko wrote:
Looks like it tries to destroy socket which were left from previous
session,
and o
DONE.
On Aug 31, 2011, at 8:53 AM, Marcus Denker wrote:
>
> On Aug 30, 2011, at 8:45 PM, Torsten Bergmann wrote:
>
>> Anyone able to redirect "http://ci.pharo-project.org";
>> from old hudson https://pharo-ic.lille.inria.fr/hudson/
>> to new Jenkins https://ci.lille.inria.fr/pharo/
>>
>
> Oh
Hi,
I tried to download PharoKernel and execute the following script but
nothing happens:
Gofer new
renggli: 'petit';
package: 'PetitParser';
load.
Gofer new
squeaksource: 'textlint';
package: 'TextLint-Model';
package: 'TextLint-Console';
load.
WorldState addDeferredUIMessage: [ Sm
On 02.09.2011 17:19, Igor Stasenko wrote:
> On 2 September 2011 17:27, Philippe Marschall wrote:
>> On 02.09.2011 15:39, Igor Stasenko wrote:
>>> Looks like it tries to destroy socket which were left from previous session,
>>> and of course fails because in newly started image the socket handle
>
:))
I'm documenting shout using (an help for the help browser + adding
Shout-Examples with several examples).
Now, maybe 1.3 should be fixed without this help and keep it for 1.4.
Alain
On 31/08/2011 22:48, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
So what I learned waiting for the full explanation alain will ni
21 matches
Mail list logo