Re: [Pharo-project] headless CogVM on Windows

2012-09-21 Thread Sven Van Caekenberghe
Cool stuff ! -- Sven Van Caekenberghe http://stfx.eu Smalltalk is the Red Pill On 21 Sep 2012, at 19:23, Pavel Krivanek wrote: > This is the reason why I need the headless mode on Windows: > http://youtu.be/L6P6VuqDmaM > > "This video shows a very simple Pharo application based on XULRunner.

Re: [Pharo-project] [update 2.0] #20301

2012-09-21 Thread Sven Van Caekenberghe
On 21 Sep 2012, at 13:52, Marcus Denker wrote: > 20301 > - > > Issue 6697: Zn+Zdc Update 2012-09-19 > http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=6697 Thanks! Zinc-HTTP-Deprecated is an empty category now and can be removed. > Issue 6699: Share binding of metaclass methods

Re: [Pharo-project] [Vm-dev] [NB] NativeBoost meets JIT

2012-09-21 Thread Eliot Miranda
Hi Igor, great news! On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 7:59 AM, Igor Stasenko wrote: > > Hello there, > > so, we're entered a new area, where native code, generated from image > side can be run directly by JIT. > This feature was one of the first things which i wanted to try, once > Eliot released Co

Re: [Pharo-project] headless CogVM on Windows

2012-09-21 Thread Pavel Krivanek
This is the reason why I need the headless mode on Windows: http://youtu.be/L6P6VuqDmaM "This video shows a very simple Pharo application based on XULRunner. We firstly start XULRunner that displays a splashscreen. During the splash screen the XULRunner starts a new process with Pharo and starts Z

Re: [Pharo-project] headless CogVM on Windows

2012-09-21 Thread Igor Stasenko
On 21 September 2012 16:28, Torsten Bergmann wrote: >>yeah... we need a real headless mode (no systry, nothing... just a deamon >>>running) > > The regulary Squeak VM for Windows is able to do just that. > It runs Smalltalk as an NT service by using the option "-service" > See > > http://wiki.squ

[Pharo-project] [NB] NativeBoost meets JIT

2012-09-21 Thread Igor Stasenko
Hello there, so, we're entered a new area, where native code, generated from image side can be run directly by JIT. This feature was one of the first things which i wanted to try, once Eliot released Cog :) The way how we do that, is when VM decides to JIT a specific method, we copying the native

Re: [Pharo-project] FS-Bug render Pharo 2.0 useless on Win (Issue 6531)

2012-09-21 Thread Guillermo Polito
Today we were checking it with Ezequiel(he has a windowze machine). The problem seems to be in StandardFileStream>>open: fileName forWrite: writeMode ... fileID := StandardFileStream retryWithGC:[self primOpen: f writable: writeMode] until:[:id| id notNil] forFileNamed: fileName. ... that express

Re: [Pharo-project] FS-Bug render Pharo 2.0 useless on Win (Issue 6531)

2012-09-21 Thread Camillo Bruni
On 2012-09-21, at 16:35, Torsten Bergmann wrote: >> Maybe someone with better knowledge of the intentions >> of the new file system can help fixing it > > > So many responses ... ?! Please - one after the other. > Please do not push ... and yes, it would be good if we > fix this before we

[Pharo-project] FS-Bug render Pharo 2.0 useless on Win (Issue 6531)

2012-09-21 Thread Torsten Bergmann
>Maybe someone with better knowledge of the intentions >of the new file system can help fixing it So many responses ... ?! Please - one after the other. Please do not push ... and yes, it would be good if we fix this before we overtake the world Thx T.

[Pharo-project] headless CogVM on Windows

2012-09-21 Thread Torsten Bergmann
>yeah... we need a real headless mode (no systry, nothing... just a deamon >>running) The regulary Squeak VM for Windows is able to do just that. It runs Smalltalk as an NT service by using the option "-service" See http://wiki.squeak.org/squeak/105 Dont know if this also works on Cog/Pharo sta

Re: [Pharo-project] headless CogVM on Windows

2012-09-21 Thread Esteban Lorenzano
yeah... we need a real headless mode (no systry, nothing... just a deamon running) On Sep 21, 2012, at 2:52 PM, Pavel Krivanek wrote: > hmm :-( at least older Windows VM versions started directly to systray. > > -- Pavel > > On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 2:46 PM, Esteban Lorenzano > wrote: >> tha

Re: [Pharo-project] headless CogVM on Windows

2012-09-21 Thread Pavel Krivanek
hmm :-( at least older Windows VM versions started directly to systray. -- Pavel On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 2:46 PM, Esteban Lorenzano wrote: > that was always like that... headless mode is not actually headless in any of > the platforms. > > Esteban > > On Sep 21, 2012, at 2:27 PM, Pavel Krivanek

Re: [Pharo-project] headless CogVM on Windows

2012-09-21 Thread Esteban Lorenzano
that was always like that... headless mode is not actually headless in any of the platforms. Esteban On Sep 21, 2012, at 2:27 PM, Pavel Krivanek wrote: > Hi, > > it seems that the headless mode in CogVM on Windows is not working > well. It always opens a window and the only difference from

[Pharo-project] [update 2.0] #20301

2012-09-21 Thread Marcus Denker
20301 - Issue 6697: Zn+Zdc Update 2012-09-19 http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=6697 Issue 6699: Share binding of metaclass methods http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=6699 -- Marcus Denker -- http://marcusdenker.de

[Pharo-project] [update 2.0] #20300

2012-09-21 Thread Marcus Denker
20300 - Issue 6712: nautilus not working anymore http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=6712 Issue 6708: Remove BlockClosure>>once which is useless http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=6708 Issue 6705: update CI-Core htt

Re: [Pharo-project] Smalltalkhub news

2012-09-21 Thread Nicolas Petton
I really like the abstraction that Voyage provides. We could check if it would make sense to use it for SmalltalkHub. I really hate duplicated efforts. Nico On Fri, 21 Sep 2012 11:11:33 +0200, Esteban Lorenzano wrote: > in fact, I already dropped old Voyage session cache for the one in > Smal

Re: [Pharo-project] Smalltalkhub news

2012-09-21 Thread Esteban Lorenzano
in fact, I already dropped old Voyage session cache for the one in SmalltalkHub, which was cooler than mine :) now is turn to Nico to check what can he use from Voyage, and if that makes sense ;) Esteban On Sep 21, 2012, at 11:05 AM, Nicolas Petton wrote: > > Yes, in fact with Esteban we th

Re: [Pharo-project] Smalltalkhub news

2012-09-21 Thread Nicolas Petton
Yes, in fact with Esteban we thought about merging our work or maybe I will drop my layer and use Voyage. Nico On Thu, 20 Sep 2012 10:30:30 -0700, Francois Stephany wrote: > Ok! > > I've managed to load it but haven't tried to run it (yet). I almost gave > up before realising that KO is the