Igor,
I am emailing you offline but I just do not get why people are so interested in
storing source code in a relational database.
We have objects, there is a known mismatch between the object and relational
world. So how does the relational database help out?
Cincom has spent many man-years
I think it was Kent Beck who ended his email with: "Source code in files? How
1970ish"
Reg
On 2011-04-20, at 4:17 PM, Norbert Hartl wrote:
> Amen!
>
> Norbert
>
> Am 20.04.2011 um 18:01 schrieb Dale Henrichs:
>
>> Smalltalk is not file-based. For better or for worse.
>>
>> The fundamental
+1 --- it would be very nice
> A break point should not turn the MC package into dirty as opposite to
>inserting a self halt or self haltIf:[...].
>
and
-> one could remove all breakpoints with a menu entry
-> disable but not remove
-> watchpoints (viewers for values and expressions)
So why is C# on the list? It certainly is not an emerging language.
There are two Smalltalk influence languages on the list: Slate and Newspeak
Regards,
Reg
On 2010-05-09, at 9:40 AM, Mariano Martinez Peck wrote:
> I have just see the website and seems very interesting! Although Smalltalk
>
This has to do with learning styles. There was an interesting discussion
on the vw or squeak list a few weeks ago about this.
One wants something to allow people to choose what fits their learning
style in their initial contact. In addtion to Tim's susggestions, a series
of videos could also be us
Also, for an instance class defined as a variableSubclass, the contents of
the 'slots' are not displayed in the inspector. This is decidedly
unhelpful.
Define class as:
Object variableSubclass: #MyClass
instanceVariableNames: ''
classVariableBanes: ''
poolDictionaries: ''
category: 'M
. Is this right?
> |
> | Norbert
> |
> |
> | ___
> | Pharo-project mailing list
> | Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
> | http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>
>
