On Wed, 2012-05-16 at 08:31 -0700, Francois Stephany wrote:
> > Yes let us create a core-dev private mailing-list.
>
>
> Please don't.
>
> Just force people to use pharo-users when the question does not fit the
> criteria for pharo-project.
Agreed. I like to see what's going on, even if I can'
On Thu, 2012-05-10 at 16:26 +0200, Igor Stasenko wrote:
> i found this funny..
>
> most of you probably know, what ffs means..
> if not, see here: http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=FFS
I believe it stands for "fair's fair - surely". It's often found near
another acronym "WTF:, which
On Fri, 2012-05-04 at 14:18 +1000, James Ladd wrote:
> Please adopt a lonely Class that needs a home,
You've already sent that once.
On Tue, 2012-02-21 at 13:33 -0600, Jimmie Houchin wrote:
> If he actually provides
> something usefully such as a bug report with reproducible actions, or
> a patch, an appropriate approved actionable suggestion. Then we can
> treat those emails with the respect due such emails.
Igor Stasenko wrote:
On 14 February 2011 01:32, Schwab,Wilhelm K wrote:
That's where I typically use a dictionary.
Indeed.
Yes - sensible answer from Wilhelm Schwab.
You didn't answer the question though.
Because it sounds rhetoric to me.
How to deal with randomly put integers coming
Igor Stasenko wrote:
You have some integers: 0 83 67 77 68 72 80 112 113 87 70 82. When a
variable's value is equal to any of these...
Don't try to convince me that there are sort of problems which can be
solved only by using case statement :)
You didn't answer the question though.
First,
Name|Native Language|Greeting in native lang|Born country|Writing from|More
Steve Taylor|English|hello|Australia|Australia|old smalltalker looking
to get back into it
Lukas Renggli wrote:
Is there anyone out there working on this sort of project?
Flash:
http://blogs.inextenso.com/seaside/blog/learning/795d945e-d6cf-11db-ace5-000d935fad1c
That's right - I'd forgotten about VistaScript. It looked good for a
while and then it completely disappeared off the
The question it raises for me - I've always been tantalised by the
prospect of Smalltalk running on top of a popular and widespread
platform - Bistro, which brought Smalltalk to the JVM was an early attempt.
What I'd really like to see these days though is a Smalltalk environment
running on to
Janko Mivšek wrote:
- Namespaces
+1 - that would be a very nice present.
Igor Stasenko wrote:
Fine. Let this mindless crowd go its way. I don't feel a loss.
I do. I would prefer the "mindless crowd" as you call them to be on our
side.
Steve
___
Pharo-project mailing list
Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inr
Henrik Johansen wrote:
Gotta love reddit...
[...]
- "I don't know what Smalltalk is, and the site doesn't tell me, not even the about
page!"
That one I think is legitimate - and not just for Pharo but for almost
every Open Source project out there. I think every project's home page
shoul
Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
> Parrot's GC suffers from having many different kinds of mixed objects.
Could you explain (or give a pointer) to what you mean by "mixed objects"?
Steve
___
Pharo-project mailing list
Pharo-project@lists.
Schwab,Wilhelm K wrote:
> Steve,
>
> I'm confused: how is a D4 guy an idea space fan???
The key word is laziness - not the good sort of laziness that
programmers are supposed to have, along with hubris, etc, but the bad
sort you're supposed to shake yourself out of. I've bought the various
n
Schwab,Wilhelm K wrote:
> Dolphin is better than that
I've put my money where my mouth is with Dolphin - I think I've bought
every product they've ever released, just to give them a hand - despite
the fact that I've still got a Dolphin version4 image on the go!
> The feature you are describing
Adrian Kuhn wrote:
> For example, one thing we could do is pushing Stackoverflow. They have a
> large
> userbase and excellent google ranks. When you ask a question on SO, it
> appears
> *immediately* on google!
StackOverflow is good. I recently asked a Pharo question there about
missing b
Michael Rueger wrote:
> Henrik Johansen wrote:
>
>> This is just another reason why multiple native windows would be nice,
>> though, leaves the problem for someone else :)
>
> Interestingly enough a lot of the (complex) multiple native window
> applications have (gone back to) all in one windo
Schwab,Wilhelm K wrote:
> The counter argument is that PBE is readily available and very well written.
It is, but I think it's well worth considering what people think in
their first couple of seconds of exposure to a new product - especially
something like Smalltalk where people may well be loo
18 matches
Mail list logo
