Re: [Pharo-project] [Pharo-users] Call for Pharo Support **important**

2011-02-16 Thread Tudor Girba
The reason I am asking is that in the text you say "if your company/research group would be interested", which tends to not invite individuals. Ok, so individuals should sign it, too? Cheers, Doru On 16 Feb 2011, at 23:01, Stéphane Ducasse wrote: > both > this is a user and industrial consort

Re: [Pharo-project] [Pharo-users] Call for Pharo Support **important**

2011-02-17 Thread Stéphane Ducasse
On Feb 16, 2011, at 11:28 PM, Tudor Girba wrote: > The reason I am asking is that in the text you say "if your company/research > group would be interested", which tends to not invite individuals. > > Ok, so individuals should sign it, too? yes > > Cheers, > Doru > > > On 16 Feb 2011, at 2

Re: [Pharo-project] [Pharo-users] Call for Pharo Support **important**

2011-02-18 Thread Stéphane Ducasse
Hi davorin It says that you would consider paying a membership if this one is ok for you but that the membership would have to be clear. So this is just a letter of support. Your are not tying yourself. We will decide together the model because we should like that everybody can contribute. Now

Re: [Pharo-project] [Pharo-users] Call for Pharo Support **important**

2011-02-18 Thread Krishsmalltalk
Count me in. What is the formality in sign n dispatch of the letter Sudhakar krishnamachari Extn 91-40403012 Cell 9902104814 On Feb 18, 2011, at 1:43 PM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote: > Hi davorin > It says that you would consider paying a membership if this one is ok for you > but that the membe

Re: [Pharo-project] [Pharo-users] Call for Pharo Support **important**

2011-02-19 Thread Stéphane Ducasse
On Feb 19, 2011, at 5:35 AM, Krishsmalltalk wrote: > Count me in. Excellent! > What is the formality in sign n dispatch of the letter just sign it and scanned/fax it to me. > > Sudhakar krishnamachari > > Extn 91-40403012 > Cell 9902104814 > > > > On Feb 18, 2011, at 1:43 PM, Stéphane D