On 5/14/12 8:06 PM, Lawson English wrote:
On 5/14/12 8:02 PM, Lawson English wrote:
OK, getting closer. However I'm still not quite getting what I expect:
f1 := GMPfWrapper new.
f2 := GMPfWrapper new.
f3 := GMPfWrapper new.
f1 set_ui: 50.
f2 set_ui: 50.
f3 set_ui:50.
(f3 +f2) asString == '1
On 15 May 2012 09:42, Lawson English lengli...@cox.net wrote:
On 5/14/12 8:06 PM, Lawson English wrote:
On 5/14/12 8:02 PM, Lawson English wrote:
OK, getting closer. However I'm still not quite getting what I expect:
f1 := GMPfWrapper new.
f2 := GMPfWrapper new.
f3 := GMPfWrapper new.
On May 14, 2012, at 12:49 AM, Igor Stasenko wrote:
On 14 May 2012 00:03, Lawson English lengli...@cox.net wrote:
[pharo-project list added back in]
On 5/13/12 1:34 PM, Nicolas Cellier wrote:
[10 primeSwingFactorial] timeToRun 3411 [10 factorial] timeToRun
61219 So gmp is still
I am trying to implement an asString method for gmp floats but I don't
quite see how.
Prototype for getting a string is:
Function: char * mpf_get_str (char *str, mp_exp_t *expptr, int base,
size_t n_digits, mpf_t op)
where mp_exp_t *expptr is just a pointer to a long, and size_t is just
On 5/13/12 11:02 AM, Lawson English wrote:
[results]
Ack, I printed the times for the gmplib off by a factor of 10. However,
the ratio is still correct.
gmplib is at least 700x faster than the built-in factorial method for
10 factorial.
--
Squeak from the very start (introduction to
[pharo-project list added back in]
On 5/13/12 1:34 PM, Nicolas Cellier wrote:
[10 primeSwingFactorial] timeToRun 3411 [10 factorial]
timeToRun 61219 So gmp is still 40x faster than a reasonably optimized
Smalltalk factorial... I think that's fair, because gmp is highly
optimized.
On 14 May 2012 00:03, Lawson English lengli...@cox.net wrote:
[pharo-project list added back in]
On 5/13/12 1:34 PM, Nicolas Cellier wrote:
[10 primeSwingFactorial] timeToRun 3411 [10 factorial] timeToRun
61219 So gmp is still 40x faster than a reasonably optimized Smalltalk
