2009/3/21 Igor Stasenko :
> 2009/3/21 John M McIntosh :
>>
>> On 21-Mar-09, at 3:09 AM, Igor Stasenko wrote:
>>
>>> Right, but here we're talking about doing such conversion much more
>>> earlier (at event source object),
>>> so then event sensor already deals with first class event objects.
>>> I
2009/3/21 John M McIntosh :
>
> On 21-Mar-09, at 3:09 AM, Igor Stasenko wrote:
>
>> Right, but here we're talking about doing such conversion much more
>> earlier (at event source object),
>> so then event sensor already deals with first class event objects.
>> I want to know, if such scheme (which
On 21-Mar-09, at 3:09 AM, Igor Stasenko wrote:
> Right, but here we're talking about doing such conversion much more
> earlier (at event source object),
> so then event sensor already deals with first class event objects.
> I want to know, if such scheme (which i described in first post) is
> p
2009/3/21 Michael Rueger :
> Igor Stasenko wrote:
>
>> Wait, i proposing nearly same: Have an event source which produces
>> (non-morphic) event objects and InputSensor.
>> I just want to know where Announcements takes part of it, or should be
>> postpone that for a next step?
>
> What I did while
Igor Stasenko wrote:
> Wait, i proposing nearly same: Have an event source which produces
> (non-morphic) event objects and InputSensor.
> I just want to know where Announcements takes part of it, or should be
> postpone that for a next step?
What I did while exploring an alternative UI framework
2009/3/21 Andreas Raab :
> Igor Stasenko wrote:
>>
>> Recently , we discussed it with Andreas, and had an idea to integrate
>> this with Announcement framework (and Announcement will become a core
>> package).
>
> Actually, Jecel propsed the combination.
>
>> Here is my vision , how things should l
