On Feb 22, 2013, at 9:16 AM, Goubier Thierry wrote:
> Le 22/02/2013 07:23, Marcus Denker a écrit :
>>
>> On Feb 21, 2013, at 9:52 PM, Frank Shearar wrote:
>>
>>> On 21 February 2013 19:52, Eliot Miranda wrote:
Hi All,
anyone have any bytecode-to-bytecode transformation to
Le 22/02/2013 07:23, Marcus Denker a écrit :
On Feb 21, 2013, at 9:52 PM, Frank Shearar wrote:
On 21 February 2013 19:52, Eliot Miranda wrote:
Hi All,
anyone have any bytecode-to-bytecode transformation tools for
doing basic-block resolution coverage?
Is it possible that Jejak [1] m
Le 21/02/2013 21:52, Frank Shearar a écrit :
On 21 February 2013 19:52, Eliot Miranda wrote:
Hi All,
anyone have any bytecode-to-bytecode transformation tools for
doing basic-block resolution coverage?
Is it possible that Jejak [1] might vaguely fit this bill? It's a
tracing tool, but
On Feb 21, 2013, at 9:52 PM, Frank Shearar wrote:
> On 21 February 2013 19:52, Eliot Miranda wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> anyone have any bytecode-to-bytecode transformation tools for
>> doing basic-block resolution coverage?
>
> Is it possible that Jejak [1] might vaguely fit this bill? It's
On 21 February 2013 19:52, Eliot Miranda wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> anyone have any bytecode-to-bytecode transformation tools for
> doing basic-block resolution coverage?
Is it possible that Jejak [1] might vaguely fit this bill? It's a
tracing tool, but maybe one could hack something on the side
