[Pharo-project] [update 3.0] #30069

2013-04-28 Thread Marcus Denker
30069 - 10423 simplify #firstPrecodeCommentFor: https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/10423 10426 move #parseSelector to Compiler https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/10426 Diff information: http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~Pharo/Pharo30/diff/Traits-MarcusDenker.481 http://smallt

Re: [Pharo-project] [update 3.0] #30069

2013-04-28 Thread stephane ducasse
We should really ask nicolas to check why the diff is broken because it was really nice to be able to follow changes. Stef On Apr 28, 2013, at 7:35 PM, Marcus Denker wrote: > 30069 > - > > 10423 simplify #firstPrecodeCommentFor: > https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/10423 > > 1

Re: [Pharo-project] [update 3.0] #30069

2013-04-28 Thread Sean P. DeNigris
stephane ducasse wrote > We should really ask nicolas to check why the diff is broken I mentioned a few times that it seems that it fails when none of the package version's ancestors are present on stub. e.g. from http://forum.world.st/update-3-0-30024-td4680178.html, http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~P

Re: [Pharo-project] [update 3.0] #30069

2013-04-28 Thread stephane ducasse
On Apr 28, 2013, at 11:33 PM, Sean P. DeNigris wrote: > stephane ducasse wrote >> We should really ask nicolas to check why the diff is broken > > I mentioned a few times that it seems that it fails when none of the package > version's ancestors are present on stub. e.g. from > http://forum.wor