Re: [Pharo-project] A tinyBenchmark

2011-02-11 Thread Igor Stasenko
On 11 February 2011 02:52, Levente Uzonyi wrote: > On Fri, 11 Feb 2011, Igor Stasenko wrote: > >> so much noise for so insignificant smoke test. >> I'd rather prefer seeing Cog doing copy-down compiled method, at least >> for most simple cases - self sends :) > > Do you mean inlining? > > yes > L

Re: [Pharo-project] A tinyBenchmark

2011-02-10 Thread Stéphane Ducasse
it is on the radar http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3546 Stef On Feb 11, 2011, at 2:03 AM, David T. Lewis wrote: > On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 07:12:03PM +0100, Sven Van Caekenberghe wrote: >> >> On 10 Feb 2011, at 17:45, Felipe Ba?ados Schwerter wrote: >> >>> Every System w

Re: [Pharo-project] A tinyBenchmark

2011-02-10 Thread Levente Uzonyi
On Fri, 11 Feb 2011, Igor Stasenko wrote: so much noise for so insignificant smoke test. I'd rather prefer seeing Cog doing copy-down compiled method, at least for most simple cases - self sends :) Do you mean inlining? Levente -- Best regards, Igor Stasenko AKA sig.

Re: [Pharo-project] A tinyBenchmark

2011-02-10 Thread Igor Stasenko
so much noise for so insignificant smoke test. I'd rather prefer seeing Cog doing copy-down compiled method, at least for most simple cases - self sends :) -- Best regards, Igor Stasenko AKA sig.

Re: [Pharo-project] A tinyBenchmark

2011-02-10 Thread David T. Lewis
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 07:12:03PM +0100, Sven Van Caekenberghe wrote: > > On 10 Feb 2011, at 17:45, Felipe Ba?ados Schwerter wrote: > > > Every System was the one available from their websites. (Got Pharo 1.2 from > > Hudson about 3 days ago.) However, VisualWorks is not available from its >

Re: [Pharo-project] A tinyBenchmark

2011-02-10 Thread Levente Uzonyi
On Thu, 10 Feb 2011, Sven Van Caekenberghe wrote: On 10 Feb 2011, at 17:45, Felipe Ba?ados Schwerter wrote: Every System was the one available from their websites. (Got Pharo 1.2 from Hudson about 3 days ago.) However, VisualWorks is not available from its website right now. I installed it

Re: [Pharo-project] A tinyBenchmark

2011-02-10 Thread Levente Uzonyi
On Thu, 10 Feb 2011, Felipe Ba?ados Schwerter wrote: Hi Everybody! This is my first post on the list, even though i've been subscribed for more than 6 months. 2011/2/10 Levente Uzonyi On Thu, 10 Feb 2011, Torsten Bergmann wrote: see http://fbanados.wordpress.com/2011/02/10/a-tinybenchmark

Re: [Pharo-project] A tinyBenchmark

2011-02-10 Thread Stéphane Ducasse
>>> In the Cog-Benchmarks (in Cog package) that I uploaded to squeaksource >>> recently you'll find ShootoutTests which has 4 tests from the computer >>> language shootouts that are pure Smalltalk. >>> >> >> Camillo and Toon did a nice benchmarks framework for Pinnoccio... we should >> look a

Re: [Pharo-project] A tinyBenchmark

2011-02-10 Thread Tudor Girba
On 10 Feb 2011, at 19:49, Marcus Denker wrote: > > On Feb 10, 2011, at 10:18 AM, Eliot Miranda wrote: >> >> In the Cog-Benchmarks (in Cog package) that I uploaded to squeaksource >> recently you'll find ShootoutTests which has 4 tests from the computer >> language shootouts that are pure Smal

Re: [Pharo-project] A tinyBenchmark

2011-02-10 Thread Marcus Denker
On Feb 10, 2011, at 10:18 AM, Eliot Miranda wrote: > > In the Cog-Benchmarks (in Cog package) that I uploaded to squeaksource > recently you'll find ShootoutTests which has 4 tests from the computer > language shootouts that are pure Smalltalk. > Camillo and Toon did a nice benchmarks framew

Re: [Pharo-project] A tinyBenchmark

2011-02-10 Thread Stéphane Ducasse
Welcome Felipe! stef

Re: [Pharo-project] A tinyBenchmark

2011-02-10 Thread Eliot Miranda
2011/2/10 Felipe Bañados Schwerter > Hi Everybody! This is my first post on the list, even though i've been > subscribed for more than 6 months. > > 2011/2/10 Levente Uzonyi > > On Thu, 10 Feb 2011, Torsten Bergmann wrote: >> >> see http://fbanados.wordpress.com/2011/02/10/a-tinybenchmark >>> >

Re: [Pharo-project] A tinyBenchmark

2011-02-10 Thread Sven Van Caekenberghe
On 10 Feb 2011, at 17:45, Felipe Bañados Schwerter wrote: > Every System was the one available from their websites. (Got Pharo 1.2 from > Hudson about 3 days ago.) However, VisualWorks is not available from its > website right now. I installed it from a Cincom CD-ROM I got on Smalltalks > 201

Re: [Pharo-project] A tinyBenchmark

2011-02-10 Thread Lemuus
> 2011/2/10 Levente Uzonyi > > On Thu, 10 Feb 2011, Torsten Bergmann wrote: >> >> see http://fbanados.wordpress.com/2011/02/10/a-tinybenchmark >>> >>> Maybe Eliot is able to say something here on the main >>> differences between Cog <-> VW VM. >>> >> >> You made several mistakes: >> - You didn't

Re: [Pharo-project] A tinyBenchmark

2011-02-10 Thread Felipe Bañados Schwerter
Hi Everybody! This is my first post on the list, even though i've been subscribed for more than 6 months. 2011/2/10 Levente Uzonyi > On Thu, 10 Feb 2011, Torsten Bergmann wrote: > > see http://fbanados.wordpress.com/2011/02/10/a-tinybenchmark >> >> Maybe Eliot is able to say something here on t

Re: [Pharo-project] A tinyBenchmark

2011-02-10 Thread Levente Uzonyi
On Thu, 10 Feb 2011, Levente Uzonyi wrote: On Thu, 10 Feb 2011, Torsten Bergmann wrote: see http://fbanados.wordpress.com/2011/02/10/a-tinybenchmark Maybe Eliot is able to say something here on the main differences between Cog <-> VW VM. You made several mistakes: I mean Felipe, not you T

Re: [Pharo-project] A tinyBenchmark

2011-02-10 Thread Levente Uzonyi
On Thu, 10 Feb 2011, Torsten Bergmann wrote: see http://fbanados.wordpress.com/2011/02/10/a-tinybenchmark Maybe Eliot is able to say something here on the main differences between Cog <-> VW VM. You made several mistakes: - You didn't post the source code for #tinyBenchmarks. Do all those Sm

[Pharo-project] A tinyBenchmark

2011-02-09 Thread Torsten Bergmann
see http://fbanados.wordpress.com/2011/02/10/a-tinybenchmark Maybe Eliot is able to say something here on the main differences between Cog <-> VW VM. Thx T. -- NEU: FreePhone - kostenlos mobil telefonieren und surfen! Jetzt informieren: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/freephone