Ok :)
for now I kept it.
And I'm creating an unused category to group the rules that we do not follow.
I hope soon that we will develop some good rules to drive our development.
Stef
On Dec 30, 2012, at 9:05 PM, Peter Hugosson-Miller wrote:
> Possibly it's useful as a warning to one who comes fr
Possibly it's useful as a warning to one who comes from a C-syntax language,
and might accidentally define a literal array containing some. For example,
#(1, 2, 3) - not an error, but not (as the perpetrator might believe) an array
containing three integers ;)
--
Cheers,
Peter.
On 30 dec 2012,
Hi
I'm going over all the SmallLint rule and extending their rationale and fixing
sometimes their default check.
Now I'm reading
RBLiteralArrayContainsCommaRule
rationale
^ 'Checks for literal arrays that contain the #, symbol.'
and I have no idea why this would be a problem.
Anybo
