On 2013-02-24, at 22:25, p...@highoctane.be wrote:
Camillo,
The zeronconf version is build with an older GLIBC and fails when
started on deb6 amd64.
I still think it is the oposite
`ldd --version` gives me something like EGLIBC 2.11
and this thread here says exactly the same
Hi phil
why do you not use the pharo git version?
Stef
On Feb 24, 2013, at 8:21 PM, p...@highoctane.be wrote:
I've been trying to build pharo on debian 6 amd64
I've installed:
libc6dev-i386
ia32-libs
Then downloaded coglinux from Eliot's site. Launching squeak on the
Because I am not interested in just getting C sources, but
understanding the VM build process from scratch.
Also, because that version fails with the GLIBC level problem (this
includes the zeroconf script).
I want to be able to make a debian package for Pharo, so, having Pharo
running is step
On 2013-02-24, at 21:25, p...@highoctane.be p...@highoctane.be wrote:
Because I am not interested in just getting C sources, but
understanding the VM build process from scratch.
Also, because that version fails with the GLIBC level problem (this
includes the zeroconf script).
the easiest
Camillo,
The zeronconf version is build with an older GLIBC and fails when
started on deb6 amd64.
Stef,
Look at what comes from unzipping the build on files.pharo.org:
root@devdebian:/home/philippeback/Downloads/pharovm91# ./pharo
./pharo: /lib32/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.15' not found
as an immediate response to that issue I started adding new flavors of linux
slaves to our build system. Like that we are more certain that the VM will
actually work under different circumstances.
- debian 6.0.6 64bit
- fedora 17 64bit
- windows-xp
I will spend some more time tomorrow to fully
