Re: [Pharo-project] CachedBlockClosure was gone on purpose?

2012-11-18 Thread Eliot Miranda
I replaced the implementation with one based on properties. It's in Squeak trunk and works fine. The VisualWorks style clean-block implementation is more complex but arguably not better, and being based on become: is less well suited to Squeak. On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 4:07 AM, Marcus Denker wro

Re: [Pharo-project] CachedBlockClosure was gone on purpose?

2012-11-17 Thread Marcus Denker
On Nov 17, 2012, at 9:05 AM, Marcus Denker wrote: > > On Nov 17, 2012, at 8:20 AM, Mariano Martinez Peck > wrote: > >> Because it is not present in 2.0 but I couldn't find any issue about that. >> Issue was http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=6708 -- Marcus Denker -- http://ma

Re: [Pharo-project] CachedBlockClosure was gone on purpose?

2012-11-17 Thread Marcus Denker
On Nov 17, 2012, at 8:20 AM, Mariano Martinez Peck wrote: > Because it is not present in 2.0 but I couldn't find any issue about that. > Because it does not work with the block closure implementation that we have now... The thing is that a block in a method like this: [1+2] is not a litera