I replaced the implementation with one based on properties. It's in Squeak
trunk and works fine. The VisualWorks style clean-block implementation is
more complex but arguably not better, and being based on become: is less
well suited to Squeak.
On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 4:07 AM, Marcus Denker wro
On Nov 17, 2012, at 9:05 AM, Marcus Denker wrote:
>
> On Nov 17, 2012, at 8:20 AM, Mariano Martinez Peck
> wrote:
>
>> Because it is not present in 2.0 but I couldn't find any issue about that.
>>
Issue was http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=6708
--
Marcus Denker -- http://ma
On Nov 17, 2012, at 8:20 AM, Mariano Martinez Peck
wrote:
> Because it is not present in 2.0 but I couldn't find any issue about that.
>
Because it does not work with the block closure implementation that we have
now...
The thing is that a block in a method like this:
[1+2]
is not a litera