MIT since it is published in Squeak.
On Dec 26, 2010, at 11:22 AM, Mariano Martinez Peck wrote:
> what is the licence? because we already have problem with that.
>
> On Sun, Dec 26, 2010 at 10:04 AM, Stéphane Ducasse
> wrote:
> Ralph
>
> point us to it, what is it, where is it?
> open a tic
what is the licence? because we already have problem with that.
On Sun, Dec 26, 2010 at 10:04 AM, Stéphane Ducasse <
stephane.duca...@inria.fr> wrote:
> Ralph
>
> point us to it, what is it, where is it?
> open a ticker with the code is the best way to make sure that something can
> happen.
> Pro
Ralph
point us to it, what is it, where is it?
open a ticker with the code is the best way to make sure that something can
happen.
Provide tests is another steps.
Stef I think that this one can be easily done.
On Dec 26, 2010, at 2:21 AM, Ralph Boland wrote:
> Dear Santa, if it's not too late,
Dear Santa, if it's not too late, please add the generator code
that Andreas Raas added to Squeak to Pharo as well.
Generators are used in some of the packages that I have written
for Squeak but they don't port to Pharo without the generator code.
Oh please Santa, it's under 150 lines of code and
Here's my wish list :
1) No more useless, never-ending, ad nauseam discussions/arguments comparing
Pharo with Squeak or any Smalltalk with any other Smalltalk implementation.
May I add that, I suppose, I am like most people on this list : I love
Smalltalk
regardless of which implementation it
Hi Eliot,
On 20. 12. 2010 20:00, Eliot Miranda wrote:
> - Namespaces
> - Breakpoints
> - Monticello/Metacello directly from browser
> - portable async FFI
> - SOAP/WSDL with object mapping and one-click tool
> - even more usability enhancements
> - rock solid image and
Still enter it in the bug entry like that we can track it back
On Dec 21, 2010, at 1:30 PM, Stefan Marr wrote:
>
> On 21 Dec 2010, at 13:19, Luc Fabresse wrote:
>
>> Hi Stefan,
>>
>> Did you enter a bug entry?
>> because it is easier to not forget when there is one.
> No, as I said, I am not
On 21 Dec 2010, at 13:19, Luc Fabresse wrote:
> Hi Stefan,
>
> Did you enter a bug entry?
> because it is easier to not forget when there is one.
No, as I said, I am not sure whether should be changed in the standard image.
I am not even sure whether you should consider it a bug, it is certai
Hi Stefan,
Did you enter a bug entry?
because it is easier to not forget when there is one.
#Luc
2010/12/21 Stefan Marr
> Don't know, and I have only fixed one bug at the moment.
> And, it wont make it onto the list of high priority tasks anytime soon,
> thats why I ask Santa to have a look
Don't know, and I have only fixed one bug at the moment.
And, it wont make it onto the list of high priority tasks anytime soon, thats
why I ask Santa to have a look.
The patch/workaround was mentioned here:
http://forum.world.st/Delay-class-not-fit-for-RoarVM-tt3035265.html#none
On 21 Dec 20
How big is the impact?
Doru
On 21 Dec 2010, at 12:05, Stefan Marr wrote:
> No, maybe Santa has them already...
>
> Bye the way, the last discussion I started on that topic was completely
> ignored, and I am not sure whether fixing it in your images is worth it,
> since it will impact perform
Dear Santa,
I would like you to drop your f/*(«»@ XMas Present Management software which
has tons of bugs (children rarely have what they want. Myself included) and
written in this crappy programming language called .
Please use Pharo + Seaside to develop a far better software so we can
finally e
No, maybe Santa has them already...
Bye the way, the last discussion I started on that topic was completely
ignored, and I am not sure whether fixing it in your images is worth it, since
it will impact performance on standard VMs.
Best regards
Stefan
On 21 Dec 2010, at 11:53, Stéphane Ducasse
Stefan
do you have the fixes?
Stef
On Dec 20, 2010, at 11:27 PM, Stefan Marr wrote:
> I would like a Pharo Core image running nicely 16 core on the RoarVM.
> That requires just to fix a few more concurrency bugs, should not be to hard.
>
>
> On 18 Dec 2010, at 20:16, Torsten Bergmann wrote:
>
Dear Santa,
You suck, I don't believe in you. I'm sure you don't even know how to
program.
PS: But if you're reading this, I just want more time, so I can help to
program the others' wishes :P. That'll be fun :)
On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 11:06 PM, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
> I remember to have
I remember to have seen a presentation from Intel when they opened their center
in Ireland. They are targeting a 64 core CPU. I am not expert in concurrency,
but there is clearly more than a paper to write about.
Alexandre
On 20 Dec 2010, at 20:29, Stefan Marr wrote:
> Hi Alexandre:
>
> On 2
Hi Alexandre:
On 20 Dec 2010, at 23:54, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
> "I would like a Pharo Core image running nicely 16 core on the RoarVM.
> That requires just to fix a few more concurrency bugs, should not be to hard."
>
> Wow... What's a quote!
All kidding aside, the amount of concurrency related
> I would like a Pharo Core image running nicely 16 core on the RoarVM.
> That requires just to fix a few more concurrency bugs, should not be to hard.
"I would like a Pharo Core image running nicely 16 core on the RoarVM.
That requires just to fix a few more concurrency bugs, should not be to har
I would like a Pharo Core image running nicely 16 core on the RoarVM.
That requires just to fix a few more concurrency bugs, should not be to hard.
On 18 Dec 2010, at 20:16, Torsten Bergmann wrote:
> Only a few days until christmas. You should tell Santa your wishes for Pharo
> here on the list
Hi Janko,
2010/12/18 Janko Mivšek
> On 18. 12. 2010 20:38, Andreas Wacknitz wrote:
> >
> > Am 18.12.2010 um 20:16 schrieb Torsten Bergmann:
> >
> >> Only a few days until christmas. You should tell Santa your wishes for
> Pharo here on the list - who knows maybe in one of the next releases or
>
Stephen Taylor wrote:
> Janko Mivšek wrote:
>
>> - Namespaces
>
> +1 - that would be a very nice present.
>
+1 - this is a longstanding wish for many people. is it too
controversial to wonder if Pharo/Squeak namespaces can be compatible
with VisualWorks? I also miss the days of a compatible chunk
A global Information System for Smalltalk, a system directed towards smalltalk
projects and **people** (I mean smalltalkers whether dev or user) :).
Ideally directed towards all smalltalk flavors (because more than the code,
design discussions, algorithms are the most valuable information and th
Janko Mivšek wrote:
- Namespaces
+1 - that would be a very nice present.
On Dec 18, 2010, at 10:23 PM, Torsten Bergmann wrote:
>> Only that? :)
>
> Sorry ... forgot the "theming" thing (so I Santa should sent us a
> good designer that reworks the icons, GUI, ... and anything marketing
> related to be so consistent that people say: 'ah ... that must be Pharo")
do yo
half Of Stéphane Ducasse
[stephane.duca...@inria.fr]
Sent: Saturday, December 18, 2010 4:02 PM
To: Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] Dear Santa ...
let's start to get more political here:
- first did VW ever considered any community?
- second does it m
On 18. 12. 2010 20:38, Andreas Wacknitz wrote:
>
> Am 18.12.2010 um 20:16 schrieb Torsten Bergmann:
>
>> Only a few days until christmas. You should tell Santa your wishes for Pharo
>> here on the list - who knows maybe in one of the next releases or
>> announcements...
>>
>> Let me be the firs
>Only that? :)
Sorry ... forgot the "theming" thing (so I Santa should sent us a
good designer that reworks the icons, GUI, ... and anything marketing
related to be so consistent that people say: 'ah ... that must be Pharo")
>I was really a nice boy and I want more :)
I thought I wait with the
On 18. 12. 2010 22:02, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
> let's start to get more political here:
>
> - first did VW ever considered any community?
Yep, in 90's and start of new millenium. but this is unrelated question.
> - second does it make sense not to change?
This is also unrela
On 18 December 2010 22:04, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
> Only that? :)
>
> I was really a nice boy and I want more :)
> But I have the impression that santa is busy and we will have to do it
> ourselves.
hey, don't spoil the play :)
(sure we can be Santa for ourselves)
> For my wish list I sent it
Only that? :)
I was really a nice boy and I want more :)
But I have the impression that santa is busy and we will have to do it
ourselves.
For my wish list I sent it a while ago as an answer to andres.
Stef
> Only a few days until christmas. You should tell Santa your wishes for Pharo
> here o
let's start to get more political here:
- first did VW ever considered any community?
- second does it make sense not to change?
- third what is a better smalltalk?
Yes of course been fragmented is bad but this is like that.
Stef
On Dec 18, 2010, at 8:38 PM, Andrea
Am 18.12.2010 um 20:16 schrieb Torsten Bergmann:
> Only a few days until christmas. You should tell Santa your wishes for Pharo
> here on the list - who knows maybe in one of the next releases or
> announcements...
>
> Let me be the first:
> - easy to use foreign interface including callback s
On 18 December 2010 20:16, Torsten Bergmann wrote:
> Only a few days until christmas. You should tell Santa your wishes for Pharo
> here on the list - who knows maybe in one of the next releases or
> announcements...
>
> Let me be the first:
> - easy to use foreign interface including callback
Only a few days until christmas. You should tell Santa your wishes for Pharo
here on the list - who knows maybe in one of the next releases or
announcements...
Let me be the first:
- easy to use foreign interface including callback support for
all major platforms
- reliable (new) squeaksour
the new preference allowing one to set if the
fonts will be updated at image startup (default) or not.
See pharo inbox and
http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=689
Bye
T.
--
Pt! Schon vom neuen GMX MultiMessenger gehört? Der kann`s mit allen:
http://www.gmx.net/de/go/multimesse
35 matches
Mail list logo
