>
>>> Hi Eliot/Levente. What is the status of this? Do we have already the new
>>> primitive? If true, how can we adapt LargeIdentitySet to use such new
>>> primitive?
>>>
>>
>> AFAIK the new primitive is not implemented yet. Adding the primitive to
>> the interpreter VM is very easy, but it seems
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 3:16 PM, Levente Uzonyi wrote:
> On Sat, 25 Feb 2012, Mariano Martinez Peck wrote:
>
>
>>All I can say is that I am impressed by the numbers it is
>> really much
>>faster.
>>I still don't understand why I send this email with a subject
>
On Sat, 25 Feb 2012, Mariano Martinez Peck wrote:
All I can say is that I am impressed by the numbers it is really
much
faster.
I still don't understand why I send this email with a subject say
IdentitySet because what I really need is a fast/lar
> All I can say is that I am impressed by the numbers it is really much
>> faster.
>> I still don't understand why I send this email with a subject say
>> IdentitySet because what I really need is a fast/large IdentityDictionary
>> :( Anyway, there's a place where we can use this LargeIdentitySet
