Can't you just get the current implementation run as a separate
process managing that main variable along with some web/TCP interface
and get that working through Zinc or OSProcess with a control script?
I am currently experimenting with CUDA (same kind of freaking
interfacing) and frankly, the
he, Santiago *is* the engineer recruited by Noury :)
On Sep 6, 2012, at 3:17 AM, Serge Stinckwich serge.stinckw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 5:58 AM, Santiago Bragagnolo
santiagobragagn...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all!
Hi Santiago,
I'm currently working in a project related
Hum, I see ;-)
Welcome on board Santiago !
If you are interested, we can talk about the alternatives to build a
ROS client in Smalltalk (rosbridge, pure client or Python bindings).
Regards,
On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 1:43 PM, Esteban Lorenzano esteba...@gmail.com wrote:
he, Santiago *is* the
to help , though I am
not a python expert.
From: Serge Stinckwich serge.stinckw...@gmail.com
To: Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
Sent: Thursday, 6 September 2012, 10:03
Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] FFI Python
Hum, I see ;-)
Welcome on board Santiago
.
--
*From:* Serge Stinckwich serge.stinckw...@gmail.com
*To:* Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
*Sent:* Thursday, 6 September 2012, 10:03
*Subject:* Re: [Pharo-project] FFI Python
Hum, I see ;-)
Welcome on board Santiago !
If you are interested, we can talk
Serge, i'm diving into all this stuff right now, prototyping things to lern
about the architecture and have more info about how-to-reach our goal. I'm
browsing your implementation and Noury's right now, so, probably today or
maybe tomorrow i'll have questions and better ideas :).
Thanks to all
On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 3:32 PM, Santiago Bragagnolo
santiagobragagn...@gmail.com wrote:
Serge, i'm diving into all this stuff right now, prototyping things to lern
about the architecture and have more info about how-to-reach our goal. I'm
browsing your implementation and Noury's right now, so,
I have a fairly simple XMLRPC interface working.. but then that is no
substitute to direct interface..
I like the simplicity of the python binding from Smalltalk..
On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 11:38 AM, p...@highoctane.be p...@highoctane.bewrote:
Can't you just get the current implementation run as
Wrap things up in an Objective-C thing and then use the ObjectiveC bridge
to bring the object into Smalltalk space. Like Esteban did with the
DefaultFileManager in the iPad VM.
Mac only obviously.
Phil
2012/9/6 S Krish krishnamachari.sudha...@gmail.com
I have a fairly simple XMLRPC interface
On 6 September 2012 00:58, Santiago Bragagnolo
santiagobragagn...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all!
I'm currently working in a project related with ROS (robot operative
system), which already have a library to develop in C++ and other to do the
same at Python. So, there a lot of variables to
Hi all!
I'm currently working in a project related with ROS (robot operative
system), which already have a library to develop in C++ and other to do the
same at Python. So, there a lot of variables to contrast to make a choice
(performance, code-easy-to-prototype, flexibility, and a lot
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 3:58 PM, Santiago Bragagnolo
santiagobragagn...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all!
I'm currently working in a project related with ROS (robot operative
system), which already have a library to develop in C++ and other to do the
same at Python. So, there a lot of variables to
Is there a source / person who could detail how the python binding is
done...
1. To port this into Pharo
2. Port this design to bind Groovy to Pharo..
On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 6:47 AM, Serge Stinckwich serge.stinckw...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 5:58 AM, Santiago Bragagnolo
13 matches
Mail list logo
