Comment #6 on issue 2704 by elpochod...@gmail.com: Tests for broken
withNoLineLongerThan: behavior.
http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=2704
I have another implementation for this method, which I think may be a bit
cleaner (and also passes all tests)
withNoLineLongerThan: maxW
Comment #7 on issue 2704 by marianopeck: Tests for broken
withNoLineLongerThan: behavior.
http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=2704
thanks pocho :)
so, it is ready to integrate?
Comment #8 on issue 2704 by nicolas@gmail.com: Tests for broken
withNoLineLongerThan: behavior.
http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=2704
No, both methods fails with this test:
String crlf withNoLineLongerThan: 5.
Also, does your version works when there is no space available
Comment #9 on issue 2704 by nicolas@gmail.com: Tests for broken
withNoLineLongerThan: behavior.
http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=2704
SLICE-Issue-2704-String-withNoLineLongerThan-nice.1 contains fresh Squeak
test and fix.
Pocho, you can correct the alternative if you wa
Updates:
Status: Closed
Labels: Milestone-1.3
Comment #10 on issue 2704 by stephane...@gmail.com: Tests for broken
withNoLineLongerThan: behavior.
http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=2704
Thanks a lot. We have not much time for looking at these enhancements but
t
