Status: Accepted
Owner: marcus.d...@gmail.com
Labels: Milestone-1.2-DevImage
New issue 3707 by marcus.d...@gmail.com: Syntax highlighting looks strange
http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3707
... especially using BOLD for variables (both global and local), but
arguments use differ
Updates:
Cc: Benjamin.VanRyseghem
Comment #1 on issue 3707 by stephane...@gmail.com: Syntax highlighting
looks strange
http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3707
I will integrate first the fixes of ben for 3583
Comment #2 on issue 3707 by benjamin...@gmail.com: Syntax highlighting
looks strange
http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3707
You can change that in your settings.
I can maybe propose a fix to change default value :)
Comment #3 on issue 3707 by tudor.gi...@gmail.com: Syntax highlighting
looks strange
http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3707
In the latest version of GLMUITheme (from squeaksource.com/Glamour), you
get a setPreferredShoutColors which pretty much reproduces the old
highlightin
Comment #4 on issue 3707 by benjamin...@gmail.com: Syntax highlighting
looks strange
http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3707
I just committed a new version of Shout with no more bold.
But I'm not familiar with the old styling, so maybe one of you, "old"
Smalltalker could have
Comment #5 on issue 3707 by marcus.d...@gmail.com: Syntax highlighting
looks strange
http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3707
Why don't we just change it back to how it used to be? We are *frozen* and
want to release 1.2 ASAP (that is, 2 month ago).
Yet, someone changed compel
Comment #6 on issue 3707 by tudor.gi...@gmail.com: Syntax highlighting
looks strange
http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3707
I agree. Do you know where these changes are?
Comment #7 on issue 3707 by stephane...@gmail.com: Syntax highlighting
looks strange
http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3707
I do not know how this is changed but probably there is a default table
somewhere and we can take the same as in 1.3 or 1.1
Comment #8 on issue 3707 by benjamin...@gmail.com: Syntax highlighting
looks strange
http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3707
I know where it is, I will take a look tomorrow, tonight it's party ^^
Comment #9 on issue 3707 by stephane...@gmail.com: Syntax highlighting
looks strange
http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3707
SHTextStylerST80>>defaultStyleTable
I'm currently checking 1.0 and 1.2
Comment #10 on issue 3707 by stephane...@gmail.com: Syntax highlighting
looks strange
http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3707
marcus from which image did you do your screen shot?
Because I tried with 1.0, 1.1 and pasted it in 1.2 but I do not get the
same results.
and even in
Comment #11 on issue 3707 by stephane...@gmail.com: Syntax highlighting
looks strange
http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3707
BTW the bold for the instance var is nice because you can see immediately
if the class is doing an instance variable access.
Finally I do not see why th
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #12 on issue 3707 by stephane...@gmail.com: Syntax highlighting
looks strange
http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3707
So I would close this issue.
I tried to reproduce the attached png and I cannot really see self. so cyan
is not really ad
Comment #13 on issue 3707 by stephane...@gmail.com: Syntax highlighting
looks strange
http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3707
here is the one of 1.1
defaultStyleTable
"color can be a valid argument to Color class>>colorFrom: , or nil to
use the editor text color.
Comment #14 on issue 3707 by tudor.gi...@gmail.com: Syntax highlighting
looks strange
http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3707
Bold and italic do not work well with the DejaVu font. This is because in
this font the italic / bold characters have a different width than the
norma
Updates:
Status: FixProposed
Comment #15 on issue 3707 by marcus.d...@gmail.com: Syntax highlighting
looks strange
http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3707
(No comment was entered for this change.)
Comment #16 on issue 3707 by stephane...@gmail.com: Syntax highlighting
looks strange
http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3707
Ok I will remove the bold and we can integrate it.
Comment #17 on issue 3707 by marcus.d...@gmail.com: Syntax highlighting
looks strange
http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3707
Not only the bold. Just revert to the 1.1 style. Let's then experiment in
1.3
Comment #18 on issue 3707 by stephane...@gmail.com: Syntax highlighting
looks strange
http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3707
but I'm not experimenting. Reverting to the one of 1.1 does not remove the
bold!
Comment #19 on issue 3707 by stephane...@gmail.com: Syntax highlighting
looks strange
http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3707
so from which image do you have something ok so that I copy it?
Because else this is boring try and error.
Comment #20 on issue 3707 by stephane...@gmail.com: Syntax highlighting
looks strange
http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3707
Ok I found it.
SHTextStylerST80 initialize should be done after reverting the style.
Comment #21 on issue 3707 by stephane...@gmail.com: Syntax highlighting
looks strange
http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3707
I published a new version in shout.
Now I'm looking at the configuration. to see if it should be updated. So we
can close this issue.
Updates:
Status: Closed
Comment #22 on issue 3707 by stephane...@gmail.com: Syntax highlighting
looks strange
http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3707
I fixed the configurationOfShout and configurationOfPharo. Now I will try
to load that.
Comment #23 on issue 3707 by tudor.gi...@gmail.com: Syntax highlighting
looks strange
http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3707
I copied the latest Glamour-Morphic-Theme in PharoInbox. In there you have
the method:
GLMUITheme class>>setPreferredShoutColors that has the set of col
24 matches
Mail list logo
