On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 12:46 AM, Igor Stasenko wrote:
>
> But it looks like we're still not there:
>
> methods := Object methodDict values.
> SystemNavigation default browseMessageList: methods name: 'Object methods'
>
>
This is working in my latest 2.0 image :^)
On Jun 18, 2012, at 12:46 AM, Igor Stasenko wrote:
> On 17 June 2012 23:17, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
>>> Guys, we should hack this together.
>>> When is next sprint? :)
>>
>> Next friday?
>>
>
> Yeah,..
> because i still found things which i fail to understand in SystemNavigation:
> some while
On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 6:30 PM, Igor Stasenko wrote:
> On 18 June 2012 01:13, Eliot Miranda wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 3:46 PM, Igor Stasenko
> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 17 June 2012 23:17, Stéphane Ducasse
> wrote:
> >> >> Guys, we should hack this together.
> >> >> When is next sp
On 18 June 2012 01:13, Eliot Miranda wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 3:46 PM, Igor Stasenko wrote:
>>
>> On 17 June 2012 23:17, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
>> >> Guys, we should hack this together.
>> >> When is next sprint? :)
>> >
>> > Next friday?
>> >
>>
>> Yeah,..
>> because i still found
On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 3:46 PM, Igor Stasenko wrote:
> On 17 June 2012 23:17, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
> >> Guys, we should hack this together.
> >> When is next sprint? :)
> >
> > Next friday?
> >
>
> Yeah,..
> because i still found things which i fail to understand in
> SystemNavigation:
> som
On 17 June 2012 23:17, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
>> Guys, we should hack this together.
>> When is next sprint? :)
>
> Next friday?
>
Yeah,..
because i still found things which i fail to understand in SystemNavigation:
some while ago we kind of decided that best would be to match the protocol(s) of
> Guys, we should hack this together.
> When is next sprint? :)
Next friday?
Stef
On Jun 17, 2012, at 4:05 PM, Sean P. DeNigris wrote:
>
> EstebanLM wrote
>>
>> Marcus proposal is good: map RPackage with MCPackage, tag the
>> subcategories (RPackage allow adding attributes).
>>
> I'm not sure I completely understand... So MCPackages will become RPackages,
Not really bette
Guys, we should hack this together.
When is next sprint? :)
On 17 June 2012 16:08, Marcus Denker wrote:
>
> On Jun 17, 2012, at 4:05 PM, Sean P. DeNigris wrote:
>
>>
>> EstebanLM wrote
>>>
>>> Marcus proposal is good: map RPackage with MCPackage, tag the
>>> subcategories (RPackage allow adding a
On Jun 17, 2012, at 4:05 PM, Sean P. DeNigris wrote:
>
> EstebanLM wrote
>>
>> Marcus proposal is good: map RPackage with MCPackage, tag the
>> subcategories (RPackage allow adding attributes).
>>
> I'm not sure I completely understand... So MCPackages will become RPackages,
Yes.
> and subca
EstebanLM wrote
>
> Marcus proposal is good: map RPackage with MCPackage, tag the
> subcategories (RPackage allow adding attributes).
>
I'm not sure I completely understand... So MCPackages will become RPackages,
and subcategories will become RPackages tagged to indicate they belong to a
parent
> Haha, He will not discuss, but we can :).
:)
>
> The migration is also painful right now because system events are a mess. We
> have SystemChangeNotifier and SystemAnnouncer, and there is a nice hack to
> keep both working. SystemAnnouncer is registered to SystemChangeNotifier and
> old sys
sean this is not that we cannot discuss :)
this is that I'm physically tired too. So I need to rest and somebody has to do
the stuff at the end.
Stef
On Jun 16, 2012, at 2:44 PM, Sean P. DeNigris wrote:
>
> Stéphane Ducasse wrote
>>
>> sorry but I do not have the energy to discuss that public
On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 2:44 PM, Sean P. DeNigris wrote:
>
> Stéphane Ducasse wrote
> >
> > sorry but I do not have the energy to discuss that publicly and via
> email.
> > The problem is that lot of people want a lot… and my energy is limited.
> >
>
> I understand your frustration, but if we can'
Stéphane Ducasse wrote
>
> sorry but I do not have the energy to discuss that publicly and via email.
> The problem is that lot of people want a lot… and my energy is limited.
>
I understand your frustration, but if we can't discuss important new
features on the developers list... wt#$@?!
--
V
EstebanLM wrote
>
> Marcus proposal is good: map RPackage with MCPackage...
>
That sounds right to me...
Mapping packages 1:1 with categories seems like perpetuating the "category =
package" hack I thought we were trying to finally fix...
Sean
--
View this message in context:
http://forum.w
Marcus proposal is good: map RPackage with MCPackage, tag the subcategories
(RPackage allow adding attributes).
That solve all problems with few difficulties (and well... with time packages
will adapt)
this provides a transparent migration path, which is what we need.
Esteban
On Jun 16, 2012,
sorry but I do not have the energy to discuss that publicly and via email.
The problem is that lot of people want a lot… and my energy is limited.
Stef
On Jun 16, 2012, at 12:06 PM, Mariano Martinez Peck wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 5:41 AM, Sean P. DeNigris
> wrote:
> I was expectin
On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 5:41 AM, Sean P. DeNigris wrote:
> I was expecting "PackageOrganizer default packageOfClass: FileSystemError"
> to
> return "FileSystem-Core" but it returned "FileSystem-Core-Kernel", which is
> not a package. It's a category, but it's packaged in "FileSystem-Core". Is
> th
I was expecting "PackageOrganizer default packageOfClass: FileSystemError" to
return "FileSystem-Core" but it returned "FileSystem-Core-Kernel", which is
not a package. It's a category, but it's packaged in "FileSystem-Core". Is
this a bug? Will PackageOrganizer go away when RPackage takes over?
S
20 matches
Mail list logo
