+100
> 'It is you Pharo'.
> We have to make things better, one little step at a time, for all of us
> together.
On 10 May 2012, at 18:28, Sean P. DeNigris wrote:
> I patched the parser to succeed for all 3 examples and updated the tests,
> which all pass. I uploaded the packages to the SqS repository.
>
> The parsing method is now ugly. I would break it out into a separate class
> (or at least some privat
I patched the parser to succeed for all 3 examples and updated the tests,
which all pass. I uploaded the packages to the SqS repository.
The parsing method is now ugly. I would break it out into a separate class
(or at least some private methods), but I just made it work and left it to
you to deci
Sven Van Caekenberghe wrote
>
> You are underestimating me again ;-)
>
Ha ha. You're too good. I'm not used to this level of service ;-)
Sven Van Caekenberghe wrote
>
> ZnUtils>>parseHttpDate: string
>
Damn, I was looking for a ZnDate*
Sven Van Caekenberghe wrote
>
> That should cover th
Sean,
On 10 May 2012, at 16:39, Sean P. DeNigris wrote:
> Excerpt from http://forum.world.st/Parsing-HTTP-dates-td4623583.html :
>
>In HTTP/1.1, valid dates come in 3 forms (per
> http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec3.html#sec3.3.1) :
> Sun, 06 Nov 1994 08:49:37 GMT ; RFC 8
Excerpt from http://forum.world.st/Parsing-HTTP-dates-td4623583.html :
In HTTP/1.1, valid dates come in 3 forms (per
http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec3.html#sec3.3.1) :
Sun, 06 Nov 1994 08:49:37 GMT ; RFC 822, updated by RFC 1123
Sunday, 06-Nov-94 08:49:37 GMT ; RF
