Re: [Pharo-project] Pharo name conflict

2009-01-15 Thread Igor Stasenko
I wish both projects a big success, so everyone will aware of both of them and no more confused. :) 2009/1/15 Michael Rueger : > Stéphane Ducasse wrote: >> we keep it :) > > I think Damien was referring to the cross link :-) > > Michael > >> yes, that is unfortunate that we chose the same nam

Re: [Pharo-project] Pharo name conflict

2009-01-15 Thread Stéphane Ducasse
>> we keep it :) > > I think Damien was referring to the cross link :-) no sure :) ___ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

Re: [Pharo-project] Pharo name conflict

2009-01-15 Thread Michael Rueger
Stéphane Ducasse wrote: > we keep it :) I think Damien was referring to the cross link :-) Michael > >>> yes, that is unfortunate that we chose the same name around the same >>> time and both projects are already well known enough to not easily >>> switch names. >>> But, as others already said,

Re: [Pharo-project] Pharo name conflict

2009-01-15 Thread Michael Rueger
Damien Cassou wrote: > On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 11:31 AM, Michael Rueger wrote: >> yes, that is unfortunate that we chose the same name around the same >> time and both projects are already well known enough to not easily >> switch names. >> But, as others already said, the projects are sufficientl

Re: [Pharo-project] Pharo name conflict

2009-01-15 Thread Stéphane Ducasse
we keep it :) > >> yes, that is unfortunate that we chose the same name around the same >> time and both projects are already well known enough to not easily >> switch names. >> But, as others already said, the projects are sufficiently different >> to not be confused easily. >> >> Maybe we could

Re: [Pharo-project] Pharo name conflict

2009-01-15 Thread Damien Cassou
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 11:31 AM, Michael Rueger wrote: > yes, that is unfortunate that we chose the same name around the same > time and both projects are already well known enough to not easily > switch names. > But, as others already said, the projects are sufficiently different > to not be con

Re: [Pharo-project] Pharo name conflict

2009-01-15 Thread Michael Rueger
Hi David, yes, that is unfortunate that we chose the same name around the same time and both projects are already well known enough to not easily switch names. But, as others already said, the projects are sufficiently different to not be confused easily. Maybe we could cross-link on the sites? "

Re: [Pharo-project] Pharo name conflict

2009-01-15 Thread Stéphane Ducasse
Hi david We already communicated a lot on this project such as major conferences in our field (www.esug.org). Seaside (http://www.seaside.st) is developed using it and will start to communicate on that too. When we check in may it was clear that there was no other projects around and pharo i

Re: [Pharo-project] Pharo name conflict

2009-01-14 Thread Serge Stinckwich
2009/1/15 David Hammond : > Hi, I don't intend to cause a big fuss, but I have a concern about the > name of your project. > > I first became aware of your project yesterday when I ran a Google > search for the word "pharo". This is the name I had chosen for my open > source PHP framework project b

[Pharo-project] Pharo name conflict

2009-01-14 Thread David Hammond
Hi, I don't intend to cause a big fuss, but I have a concern about the name of your project. I first became aware of your project yesterday when I ran a Google search for the word "pharo". This is the name I had chosen for my open source PHP framework project back in January of 2008. At the time,