El mié, 06-04-2011 a las 19:48 -0700, Randal L. Schwartz escribió:
> > "Serge" == Serge Stinckwich writes:
>
> Serge> On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 9:38 AM, Randal L. Schwartz
> Serge> wrote:
> >>> "Serge" == Serge Stinckwich writes:
> >>
> Serge> Yes, but this SmalltalkHub not PharoHub ;-)
>
El mié, 06-04-2011 a las 19:38 -0700, Randal L. Schwartz escribió:
> > "Serge" == Serge Stinckwich writes:
>
> Serge> Yes, but this SmalltalkHub not PharoHub ;-)
>
> Oh, did I miss the parallel announcement on squeak-dev? Sorry.
That is because there isn't an announcement yet. It only ment
> "Geert" == Geert Claes writes:
Geert> That's where the ConfigurationOf...'s and Metacello come in to ensure
Geert> dependencies, versions and Smalltalk implementations.
I guess I'm thinking more of development. The question we were facing
about Squeaksource (and don't yet know if this app
.. and I see Metacello as a nice next step for SmalltalkHub: Metacello
based projects can be regarded as: serious, maintained, trustful,.. in
any case, those projects will be separated by itself from all other code.
So we won't need to care much about those not much useful code in the
repository..
Le mercredi 06 avril 2011 à 19:38 -0700, Randal L. Schwartz a écrit :
> > "Serge" == Serge Stinckwich writes:
>
> Serge> Yes, but this SmalltalkHub not PharoHub ;-)
>
> Oh, did I miss the parallel announcement on squeak-dev? Sorry.
Hi Randal,
You should blame me for that.
Cheers,
Nicolas
Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
>
> OK, so if this is a general replacement for Squeaksource, the "tagging"
> issue comes up again. How do we identify which branch of Squeak a package
> might be for? And can we maintain forks for those things that
> require it?
>
That's where the ConfigurationOf...
Randal,
Managing packages on a per platform basis is one of the things that Metacello
was designed to do ...
Dale
On Apr 6, 2011, at 7:48 PM, Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
>> "Serge" == Serge Stinckwich writes:
>
> Serge> On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 9:38 AM, Randal L. Schwartz
> Serge> wrote:
>
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 9:48 AM, Randal L. Schwartz
wrote:
>> "Serge" == Serge Stinckwich writes:
>
> Serge> On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 9:38 AM, Randal L. Schwartz
> Serge> wrote:
"Serge" == Serge Stinckwich writes:
>>>
> Serge> Yes, but this SmalltalkHub not PharoHub ;-)
>>>
>>> Oh, di
> "Serge" == Serge Stinckwich writes:
Serge> On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 9:38 AM, Randal L. Schwartz
Serge> wrote:
>>> "Serge" == Serge Stinckwich writes:
>>
Serge> Yes, but this SmalltalkHub not PharoHub ;-)
>>
>> Oh, did I miss the parallel announcement on squeak-dev? Sorry.
Serge> The
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 9:38 AM, Randal L. Schwartz
wrote:
>> "Serge" == Serge Stinckwich writes:
>
> Serge> Yes, but this SmalltalkHub not PharoHub ;-)
>
> Oh, did I miss the parallel announcement on squeak-dev? Sorry.
There was no announcement on squeak-dev.
Nicolas forget about that i gue
> "Serge" == Serge Stinckwich writes:
Serge> Yes, but this SmalltalkHub not PharoHub ;-)
Oh, did I miss the parallel announcement on squeak-dev? Sorry.
--
Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095
http://www.stonehenge.com/merlyn/>
Smalltalk/Perl/Unix co
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 8:29 AM, Randal L. Schwartz
wrote:
>> "Janko" == Janko Mivšek writes:
>
>>> I think it's a good idea to *not* automatically migrate projects from
>>> SqueakSource ;). It's an opportunity to get rid of a lot of cruft that has
>>> accumulated on SqueakSource during the
> "Janko" == Janko Mivšek writes:
>> I think it's a good idea to *not* automatically migrate projects from
>> SqueakSource ;). It's an opportunity to get rid of a lot of cruft that has
>> accumulated on SqueakSource during the last years...
Janko> But still there can be something good and
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 1:34 AM, Tudor Girba wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Unless there is a scalability issue, I would not discard anything from
> squeaksource. I believe the evolution is too valuable to simply drop it.
>
> But, maybe there are practical reasons.
>
> In any case, the idea of having programati
Le mercredi 06 avril 2011 à 20:30 +0200, Noury Bouraqadi a écrit :
> Cool! I guess you didn't you use JTalkST (too young), did you?
No, it's too young to be used in real world apps. Maybe in the future ;)
cheers,
Nico
--
Nicolas Petton
http://www.nicolas-petton.fr
> Hi,
>
> Unless there is a scalability issue, I would not discard anything from
> squeaksource. I believe the evolution is too valuable to simply drop it.
>
> But, maybe there are practical reasons.
May be we could have a second server where we copy everything there. We will
see how we will m
But you have the tool:
Gofer :)
Stef
On Apr 6, 2011, at 6:40 PM, Mariano Martinez Peck wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 6:34 PM, Adrian Lienhard wrote:
> Wow, looks great!
>
> I think it's a good idea to *not* automatically migrate projects from
> SqueakSource ;). It's an opportu
Hi,
Unless there is a scalability issue, I would not discard anything from
squeaksource. I believe the evolution is too valuable to simply drop it.
But, maybe there are practical reasons.
In any case, the idea of having programatic access is really cool. I would love
to use that for analysis p
Cool! I guess you didn't you use JTalkST (too young), did you?
On 6 avr. 2011, at 13:00, Nicolas Petton wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We've been working on a new code repository & project management
> application for Smalltalk with ESUG named SmalltalkHub.
>
> If everything goes fine, the app should be in p
On 06. 04. 2011 18:34, Adrian Lienhard wrote:
> Wow, looks great!
>
> I think it's a good idea to *not* automatically migrate projects from
> SqueakSource ;). It's an opportunity to get rid of a lot of cruft that has
> accumulated on SqueakSource during the last years...
But still there can be
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 6:34 PM, Adrian Lienhard wrote:
> Wow, looks great!
>
> I think it's a good idea to *not* automatically migrate projects from
> SqueakSource ;). It's an opportunity to get rid of a lot of cruft that has
> accumulated on SqueakSource during the last years...
>
>
+1 But prov
Wow, looks great!
I think it's a good idea to *not* automatically migrate projects from
SqueakSource ;). It's an opportunity to get rid of a lot of cruft that has
accumulated on SqueakSource during the last years...
Cheers,
Adrian
On Apr 6, 2011, at 13:07 , Tudor Girba wrote:
> Phenomenal st
What we ask is:
- scripting api so that we do not have to click click click click but
write programs
- tagging of projects
- management of projects (admin I want to be able to tag projects with
students and do not see them).
- handling of ^%$$%&*#^&*^$&$* long li
Excellent ! It's time to move past squeaksource.com.
Would be nice to know the features that will be offered, at least in
comparison with current squeaksource (besides the image crashing, and
bothering the always helpful Bern phd students).
Fernando
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 2:00 PM, Mariano Marti
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 1:45 PM, Nicolas Petton wrote:
> Le mercredi 06 avril 2011 à 13:07 +0200, Tudor Girba a écrit :
> > Phenomenal stuff :). I cannot wait to use it. Will there be a possibility
> to migrate the existing squeaksource there?
>
> There is nothing at the moment to migrate.
>
> I gu
Le mercredi 06 avril 2011 à 13:07 +0200, Tudor Girba a écrit :
> Phenomenal stuff :). I cannot wait to use it. Will there be a possibility to
> migrate the existing squeaksource there?
There is nothing at the moment to migrate.
I guess you'll just have to move your packages from squeaksource to
Phenomenal stuff :). I cannot wait to use it. Will there be a possibility to
migrate the existing squeaksource there?
Cheers,
Doru
On 6 Apr 2011, at 13:00, Nicolas Petton wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We've been working on a new code repository & project management
> application for Smalltalk with ESUG n
Hi,
We've been working on a new code repository & project management
application for Smalltalk with ESUG named SmalltalkHub.
If everything goes fine, the app should be in public beta in a week.
The source code of SmalltalkHub will be available at the same moment
(the project itself is hosted by S
28 matches
Mail list logo
