On 2012-09-06, at 02:48, "Sean P. DeNigris" wrote:
>
> Camillo Bruni-3 wrote
>>
>> let's hope nobody relies on it :P
>>
>
> Fix in inbox:
> SLICE-Issue-6645-Deprecate-SystemVersiongtgtmajorMinor-SeanDeNigris.1
> SystemVersion>>majorMinor was removed in "Issue 6560 in pharo: [Cleanup]:
> Sys
Camillo Bruni-3 wrote
>
> let's hope nobody relies on it :P
>
Fix in inbox:
SLICE-Issue-6645-Deprecate-SystemVersiongtgtmajorMinor-SeanDeNigris.1
SystemVersion>>majorMinor was removed in "Issue 6560 in pharo: [Cleanup]:
SystemVersion"; deprecate instead due to shock and outrage from the
commun
On 2012-09-06, at 00:39, "Sean P. DeNigris" wrote:
>
> Camillo Bruni-3 wrote
>>
>> ok now I get it :P totally confused why CI would no longer work...
>>
>
>- remove #majorMinor, which returns the same thing as
> #dottedMajorMinor
>
> I guess I should've deprecated it...
let's hop
Camillo Bruni-3 wrote
>
> ok now I get it :P totally confused why CI would no longer work...
>
- remove #majorMinor, which returns the same thing as
#dottedMajorMinor
I guess I should've deprecated it...
--
View this message in context:
http://forum.world.st/SystemVersion-majorM
ok now I get it :P totally confused why CI would no longer work...
On 2012-09-05, at 22:39, Esteban Lorenzano wrote:
> since today
> it was a cleanup by Sean... ask him why :)
>
> On Sep 5, 2012, at 10:31 PM, Camillo Bruni wrote:
>
>> since when is SystemVersion>>#majorMinor gone? and why?
>>
since today
it was a cleanup by Sean... ask him why :)
On Sep 5, 2012, at 10:31 PM, Camillo Bruni wrote:
> since when is SystemVersion>>#majorMinor gone? and why?
> since there is still SystemVersion>>#majorMinor:
>
> best
> cami
>
since when is SystemVersion>>#majorMinor gone? and why?
since there is still SystemVersion>>#majorMinor:
best
cami
Hi Marcus, sorry can you try again please
Mike
___
Pharo-project mailing list
Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
Hmm... I got a strange error when trying to merge that.
On Dec 13, 2009, at 10:25 PM, Michael Roberts wrote:
> http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=1566
>
> I have uploaded to PharoInbox an upgrade for SystemVersion so that the
> various images can be better aware of their version sta
http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=1566
I have uploaded to PharoInbox an upgrade for SystemVersion so that the
various images can be better aware of their version state. After the
upgrade
SystemVersion current
type --> #PharoCore
major --> 1
minor --> 1
suffix --> ALPHA
The
no problem ;-)
Mike
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 7:22 PM, Stéphane Ducasse
wrote:
> time :)
>
> Stef
>
> On Nov 17, 2009, at 7:15 PM, Michael Roberts wrote:
>
>> Stef/Adrian/Marcus what more do you need to integrate this please?
>> did I miss something?
>>
>> Thanks
>> mike
>>
>> On Sunday, November
time :)
Stef
On Nov 17, 2009, at 7:15 PM, Michael Roberts wrote:
> Stef/Adrian/Marcus what more do you need to integrate this please?
> did I miss something?
>
> Thanks
> mike
>
> On Sunday, November 15, 2009, Michael Roberts wrote:
>> Please review these changes for 1.0 & 1.1 branches. Thi
On Nov 17, 2009, at 7:15 PM, Michael Roberts wrote:
> Stef/Adrian/Marcus what more do you need to integrate this please?
> did I miss something?
>
I think not... I will have a look at this soon. :-) (maybe even tonight).
Marcus
> Thanks
> mike
>
> On Sunday, November 15, 2009, Mic
Stef/Adrian/Marcus what more do you need to integrate this please?
did I miss something?
Thanks
mike
On Sunday, November 15, 2009, Michael Roberts wrote:
> Please review these changes for 1.0 & 1.1 branches. This currently
> only bootstraps better version strings. After this I have some class
Please review these changes for 1.0 & 1.1 branches. This currently
only bootstraps better version strings. After this I have some class
changes and deprecations for 1.1 (only).
=1.0 branch=
http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=1446
In the inbox is a template update:
Name: ScriptLoad
ok cool.
before i propose changes, does anyone have any opinion on this mantis
entry copied to our tracker. Damien?
http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=1012
If no one does I suggest to close it.
thanks,
Mike
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 8:38 PM, Stéphane Ducasse
wrote:
> No I checked
No I checked by accident after and this is better than before because it was
in SystemVersion packge :)
On Nov 10, 2009, at 9:29 PM, Michael Roberts wrote:
>> Now this class should not be alone in one package.
>
> do you mean it shouldn't be in System-Support? Or in a better named
> package?
> Now this class should not be alone in one package.
do you mean it shouldn't be in System-Support? Or in a better named
package? System-Support is a mixed bag of classes.
thanks,
Mike
___
Pharo-project mailing list
Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.f
Hi, now that we have multiple branches & image types I want to improve
the publishing of test results. I'm lacking a neat way to get the
image type and branch number. I don't really want to parse the image
file name.
Seems the best thing to use is: SystemVersion current version. Is
there anything
19 matches
Mail list logo
