On 18.11.2011 13:49, Sean P. DeNigris wrote:
Henrik Sperre Johansen wrote:
Third, for the moment at least, when:do: anActionBlock subscription does
not work weakly, you are constrained to when:send:to.
Should I file a bug? There are no open issues matching "weak announcement"
and WeakSubscript
Henrik Sperre Johansen wrote:
>
> Third, for the moment at least, when:do: anActionBlock subscription does
> not work weakly, you are constrained to when:send:to.
>
Should I file a bug? There are no open issues matching "weak announcement"
and WeakSubscriptionBuilder has the method.
Is it a h
Igor Stasenko wrote:
>
>>> virtually nowhere :)
> Why? Strong subscriptions may be desirable at some point.
>
So it sounds like weak is the vast majority, so maybe have "announcer
on:..." which gives you weak subscriptions and "announcer strong on:..."
following "Make common things easy, rare t
On 18 November 2011 06:32, Sean P. DeNigris wrote:
>
> Igor Stasenko wrote:
>>
>> virtually nowhere :)
>>
>
> Should the non-weak version be removed and replaced by the weak version
> (renamed to remove the weak specification)? Or some other consolidation...
>
Why? Strong subscriptions may be des
Igor Stasenko wrote:
>
> virtually nowhere :)
>
Should the non-weak version be removed and replaced by the weak version
(renamed to remove the weak specification)? Or some other consolidation...
--
View this message in context:
http://forum.world.st/Unsubscribing-for-Announcements-tp3220751p4
On 18 November 2011 04:06, Sean P. DeNigris wrote:
>
> Tudor Girba-2 wrote:
>>
>> This works since quite a while. I use it in Glamour extensively.
>>
>
> Cool! Is it working well in 1.3 rc?
>
> Also, why do we still have the non-weak version? When would that be
> preferred?
>
virtually nowhere :)
Tudor Girba-2 wrote:
>
> This works since quite a while. I use it in Glamour extensively.
>
Cool! Is it working well in 1.3 rc?
Also, why do we still have the non-weak version? When would that be
preferred?
Sean
--
View this message in context:
http://forum.world.st/Unsubscribing-for-Announ
On 17 Nov 2011, at 05:46, Igor Stasenko wrote:
> On 17 November 2011 05:17, Sean P. DeNigris wrote:
>>
>> Tudor Girba wrote:
>>>
>>> The WeakAnnouncement are already on the agenda for 1.3.
>>>
>>
>> Bump...
>> What is the status of this? Also, what are people doing in the mean time? I
>> don'
On 17 November 2011 05:17, Sean P. DeNigris wrote:
>
> Tudor Girba wrote:
>>
>> The WeakAnnouncement are already on the agenda for 1.3.
>>
>
> Bump...
> What is the status of this? Also, what are people doing in the mean time? I
> don't see a way to safely use Announcements without automatic unsub
Tudor Girba wrote:
>
> The WeakAnnouncement are already on the agenda for 1.3.
>
Bump...
What is the status of this? Also, what are people doing in the mean time? I
don't see a way to safely use Announcements without automatic unsubscribing.
I have not found a hook in Morphic that's guaranteed
...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2011 2:52 PM
To: Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] Unsubscribing for Announcements
Who defended what status quo?
The WeakAnnouncement are already on the agenda for 1.3.
Cheers,
Doru
On 18 Jan 2011, at 20:40, Schwab,Wilhelm K wrote
Tudor Girba wrote:
>
> The WeakAnnouncement are already on the agenda for 1.3.
>
Ah, very good!
Sean
--
View this message in context:
http://forum.world.st/Unsubscribing-for-Announcements-tp3220751p3223939.html
Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Henrik Sperre Johansen wrote:
>
> AFAICT, #outOfWorld: might be the one you're looking for, it's called on
> self and submorphs as part of #removeMorph:
> So I THINK you'd get away with:
>
:) Good thought, and thanks for looking into it! However, that was my idea
too; and it doesn't work. #
_
>> From: pharo-project-boun...@lists.gforge.inria.fr
>> [pharo-project-boun...@lists.gforge.inria.fr] On Behalf Of Sean P. DeNigris
>> [s...@clipperadams.com]
>> Sent: Monday, January 17, 2011 1:18 AM
>> To: pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
_
>> From: pharo-project-boun...@lists.gforge.inria.fr
>> [pharo-project-boun...@lists.gforge.inria.fr] On Behalf Of Sean P. DeNigris
>> [s...@clipperadams.com]
>> Sent: Monday, January 17, 2011 1:18 AM
>> To: pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
[stephane.duca...@inria.fr]
Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2011 2:22 PM
To: Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] Unsubscribing for Announcements
Yes but having good weakstructure will not arrive by accident.
On Jan 17, 2011, at 4:34 PM, Schwab,Wilhelm K wrote:
> Two comme
s
> [s...@clipperadams.com]
> Sent: Monday, January 17, 2011 1:18 AM
> To: pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
> Subject: [Pharo-project] Unsubscribing for Announcements
>
> I really like Announcements! It's so much easier to update complex GUIs when
> you can pass stat
oject-boun...@lists.gforge.inria.fr
[pharo-project-boun...@lists.gforge.inria.fr] On Behalf Of Sean P. DeNigris
[s...@clipperadams.com]
Sent: Monday, January 17, 2011 1:18 AM
To: pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
Subject: [Pharo-project] Unsubscribing for Announcements
I really like Announcements! It
Den 17.01.2011 07:18, skrev Sean P. DeNigris:
> I really like Announcements! It's so much easier to update complex GUIs when
> you can pass state :)
>
> I hit one glitch when unsubscribing... The CollaborActive book suggests
> unsubscribing in #delete. For complex UIs, this doesn't seem to work
>
oject-boun...@lists.gforge.inria.fr
[pharo-project-boun...@lists.gforge.inria.fr] On Behalf Of Sean P. DeNigris
[s...@clipperadams.com]
Sent: Monday, January 17, 2011 1:18 AM
To: pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
Subject: [Pharo-project] Unsubscribing for Announcements
I really like Announcements! It
I really like Announcements! It's so much easier to update complex GUIs when
you can pass state :)
I hit one glitch when unsubscribing... The CollaborActive book suggests
unsubscribing in #delete. For complex UIs, this doesn't seem to work
because #delete is only called for the one morph that w
21 matches
Mail list logo
