Re: [Pharo-project] WAKom and Seaside 2.9

2009-08-07 Thread Philippe Marschall
Schwab,Wilhelm K wrote: > My understanding is the WAKom is on the way out - they are creating > "adpators" or something like that, and have a new way of controlling them. That's true, we try to have a uniform interface for all kinds of servers (Kom, Swazoo, ...). There will be two main "interface

Re: [Pharo-project] WAKom and Seaside 2.9

2009-08-07 Thread Philippe Marschall
Robert Sirois wrote: > Was Seaside 2.9 intended to be used with Pharo beta 1? WAKom still > doesn't work with that version. I assume you're talking about alpha4. That's our fault and not the one of Pharo. See the thread "MNU after clean install..." [1]. In general you'll get the best and quickest

Re: [Pharo-project] WAKom and Seaside 2.9

2009-08-07 Thread Robert Sirois
Thank you, Torsten's method seems to have solved my problem. I had a Seaside 2.9 changeset I just dropped in there and tried to use WAKom like in a Squeak image. Silly question I'm sure, but what is the difference between the two web servers? The callbacks? Thanks! RS

Re: [Pharo-project] WAKom and Seaside 2.9

2009-08-07 Thread Schwab,Wilhelm K
Of Damien Cassou Sent: Friday, August 07, 2009 6:12 AM To: Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] WAKom and Seaside 2.9 How did you install Seaside 2.9? 2009/8/7 Robert Sirois : > Was Seaside 2.9 intended to be used with Pharo beta 1? WAKom still > doesn't w

Re: [Pharo-project] WAKom and Seaside 2.9

2009-08-07 Thread Damien Cassou
How did you install Seaside 2.9? 2009/8/7 Robert Sirois : > Was Seaside 2.9 intended to be used with Pharo beta 1? WAKom still doesn't > work with that version. > > RS > > > Express your personality in color! Preview and select themes for HotmailĀ®. > Try it now. >

[Pharo-project] WAKom and Seaside 2.9

2009-08-06 Thread Torsten Bergmann
>Was Seaside 2.9 intended to be used with Pharo beta 1? WAKom still doesn't >>work with that version. Can you tell us more? Should work out of the box. At least it does for me. Evaluate ScriptLoader loadSeaside29 Then OK when asked to load, NO to run the tests and after loading select "

[Pharo-project] WAKom and Seaside 2.9

2009-08-06 Thread Robert Sirois
Was Seaside 2.9 intended to be used with Pharo beta 1? WAKom still doesn't work with that version. RS _ Express your personality in color! Preview and select themes for HotmailĀ®. http://www.windowslive-hotmail.com/LearnMore/person

Re: [Pharo-project] WAKom

2009-07-17 Thread Damien Cassou
2009/7/15 Robert Sirois : > Yea, that's correct. Now (running Seaside 2.9a3) I get this on localhost: > > '[closure] in WATableTag(WATagBrush)>>with:' You may want to ask on the Seaside mailing list. -- Damien Cassou http://damiencassou.seasidehosting.st "Lambdas are relegated to relative obscu

Re: [Pharo-project] WAKom

2009-07-15 Thread Robert Sirois
Yea, that's correct. Now (running Seaside 2.9a3) I get this on localhost: '[closure] in WATableTag(WATagBrush)>>with:' RS > Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2009 08:55:50 +0200 > From: m.rue...@acm.org > To: Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr > Subject: Re: [Pharo-projec

Re: [Pharo-project] WAKom

2009-07-14 Thread Michael Rueger
Robert Sirois wrote: > > WAKom doesn't work in Pharo? I believe I have the correct image and VM: > > I'm getting the following from 'WAKom startOn: 9050': > > 'BlockClosure(Object)>>doesNotUnderstand: #newProcessWithBindings:' You might be missing the dynamic binding package (not sure about the

[Pharo-project] WAKom

2009-07-14 Thread Robert Sirois
WAKom doesn't work in Pharo? I believe I have the correct image and VM: I'm getting the following from 'WAKom startOn: 9050': 'BlockClosure(Object)>>doesNotUnderstand: #newProcessWithBindings:' Thanks, RS _ Lauren found her d