No idea
>> time
>> time time
>> have you seen that adrian is working on trait sharing and that we are
>> waiting for that
>> since a couple of months or more.
>>
>> Stef
>>
> Will it load into 3.10?
>
> Keith
>
>
> ___
> Pharo-project mailing list
> Pha
> time
> time time
> have you seen that adrian is working on trait sharing and that we are
> waiting for that
> since a couple of months or more.
>
> Stef
>
Will it load into 3.10?
Keith
___
Pharo-project mailing list
Pharo-project@lists.gforge.i
>
>
> We stopped fixing the kernel in order to try and facilitate some
> harmony
> through some tools support. One result was LPF, another MC1.6, and of
> course the invisible man, Bob.
>
> Now you have all the experts, why doesnt someone who knows about
> traits
> help Matthew to fix
Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
> On Feb 12, 2009, at 1:47 PM, Keith Hodges wrote:
>
>
>>> Our goal is to make progress. Squeak is dying don't see it?
>>>
>>>
>> The reason it is dying is because once anyone starts a significant
>> project they are stuck with the same image that they started with
On Feb 12, 2009, at 1:47 PM, Keith Hodges wrote:
>
>> Our goal is to make progress. Squeak is dying don't see it?
>>
> The reason it is dying is because once anyone starts a significant
> project they are stuck with the same image that they started with.
> Thus
> everyone gets left along the pa
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> I thought that MinimalMorphic was released 2 years ago?
>>
>>
ok I was mistaken, I meant the etoys removal script
Keith
___
Pharo-project mailing list
Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/m
Come on this is not the same
On Feb 12, 2009, at 1:49 PM, Keith Hodges wrote:
> Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
>> I know. I just want to tell you that nothing is easy.
>> Now saying that we do not pay attention is not exact.
>> But really beside integrating fixes and cleaning etoy I have no time.
>>
Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
> I know. I just want to tell you that nothing is easy.
> Now saying that we do not pay attention is not exact.
> But really beside integrating fixes and cleaning etoy I have no time.
>
> Stef
>
>
I thought that MinimalMorphic was released 2 years ago?
Keith
__
> Our goal is to make progress. Squeak is dying don't see it?
>
The reason it is dying is because once anyone starts a significant
project they are stuck with the same image that they started with. Thus
everyone gets left along the path of progress. They keep up or get left
behind to fork their
>> You still dont get it do you. *** really look at it *** means pick
>> over
> the carcass. Adopting it means JOINING IN AND MAKING EVERYTHING BETTER
> FOR EVERY ONE.
I know.
>
>
> You guys have the expertise to fix things I dont,
I'm not sure :)
> and test things that I
> dont. I dont have
I know. I just want to tell you that nothing is easy.
Now saying that we do not pay attention is not exact.
But really beside integrating fixes and cleaning etoy I have no time.
Stef
On Feb 12, 2009, at 11:22 AM, Keith Hodges wrote:
> Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
>> About MC1.5 here is what I receive
Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
> About MC1.5 here is what I received as a private email.
> So I imagine that the person is a bit too negative too but you can
> understand that we pay attention and need time
> to ***really*** look at it.
>
> I hope you don't include Monticello 1.5 in Pharo. All cod
Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
> About MC1.5 here is what I received as a private email.
> So I imagine that the person is a bit too negative too but you can
> understand that we pay attention and need time
> to ***really*** look at it.
>
> I hope you don't include Monticello 1.5 in Pharo. All cod
On Feb 11, 2009, at 7:34 PM, Keith Hodges wrote:
> Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
>> Where? When?
>> Keith
>> in the long run it would be nice that yu do not bash us
>> systematically.
>> Yes we have a different way of working but normally this is often by
>> pure lack of time or information
>> that w
About MC1.5 here is what I received as a private email.
So I imagine that the person is a bit too negative too but you can
understand that we pay attention and need time
to ***really*** look at it.
I hope you don't include Monticello 1.5 in Pharo. All code that we
have seen so fa
Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
> Where? When?
> Keith
> in the long run it would be nice that yu do not bash us systematically.
> Yes we have a different way of working but normally this is often by
> pure lack of time or information
> that we do not check what exist.
>
> Stef
>
I was concerned to fi
Alexandre Bergel wrote:
> I was wondering, how many people saved their workspace content in a
> file?
>
> Cheers,
> Alexandre
>
MC1.5 supports files so if you want to manage scripts and readmes having
a workspace that knows its file, is a good idea.
Also Bob wants a way to (optionally) show y
Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] Workspace API
I average about once a year (saving contents to a file).
However, I regularly open a workspace on strings.
--
___
Pharo
I average about once a year (saving contents to a file).
However, I regularly open a workspace on strings.
___
Pharo-project mailing list
Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
I was wondering, how many people saved their workspace content in a
file?
Cheers,
Alexandre
On 11 Feb 2009, at 08:45, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
> Then I'm not in favor to load files in workspace or saving contents to
> file.
> Workspace snippets are against classes. If you have a nice and fast
Then I'm not in favor to load files in workspace or saving contents to
file.
Workspace snippets are against classes. If you have a nice and fast
snippets then you put it in a class
and work a bit and you get an little object. And you can even version it
Stef
On Feb 10, 2009, at 3:49 PM, Keit
Where? When?
Keith
in the long run it would be nice that yu do not bash us systematically.
Yes we have a different way of working but normally this is often by
pure lack of time or information
that we do not check what exist.
Stef
On Feb 10, 2009, at 3:49 PM, Keith Hodges wrote:
> http://bugs.
What do you suggest?
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 3:49 PM, Keith Hodges wrote:
> http://bugs.squeak.org/view.php?id=5669
>
> I requested then implemented a reasonable API for opening Workspaces on
> strings and files. I now find that pharo has implemented incompatible
> versions of the same.
>
> Works
http://bugs.squeak.org/view.php?id=5669
I requested then implemented a reasonable API for opening Workspaces on
strings and files. I now find that pharo has implemented incompatible
versions of the same.
Workspace openContents: 'blah'.
or
Workspace new
contents: 'blah';
label: 'Title';
24 matches
Mail list logo
