Levente is of course right, apologies for not reading
up more before making the same point belatedly
(and with many more words).
So I'll keep on reading now and keep quiet :-).
Cheers, peter
On Thu, 18 Nov 2010 18:57:58 +0100, Levente Uzonyi wrote:
On Thu, 18 Nov 2010, Marcus Denker wrote:
On Nov 18, 2010, at 6:58 PM, Levente Uzonyi wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Nov 2010, Marcus Denker wrote:
>
>>
>> On Nov 18, 2010, at 6:34 PM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
>>
>>> & | don't
>>> Do not cnfuse lazy and the others.
>>
>>
>> true xor: [false]
>>
>> --> walkback.
>>
>> false xor: [false]
>>
>
On Thu, 18 Nov 2010, Marcus Denker wrote:
On Nov 18, 2010, at 6:34 PM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
& | don't
Do not cnfuse lazy and the others.
true xor: [false]
--> walkback.
false xor: [false]
--> [false]
There is a call to #value missing (which will keep it working with booleans,
too,
On Nov 18, 2010, at 6:34 PM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
> & | don't
> Do not cnfuse lazy and the others.
true xor: [false]
--> walkback.
false xor: [false]
--> [false]
There is a call to #value missing (which will keep it working with booleans,
too, as they understand
#value, too (returnin
Oki.
Sorry.
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 2:33 PM, Stéphane Ducasse
wrote:
> & | don't
> Do not cnfuse lazy and the others.
>
> Stef
>
> On Nov 18, 2010, at 6:24 PM, Diogenes Moreira wrote:
>
>> Hi folks..
>>
>> i found today, that xor: don't recieve a block and recibe aBoolean
>>
>> i can guess, it
& | don't
Do not cnfuse lazy and the others.
Stef
On Nov 18, 2010, at 6:24 PM, Diogenes Moreira wrote:
> Hi folks..
>
> i found today, that xor: don't recieve a block and recibe aBoolean
>
> i can guess, it is wrong, because, the other logic operations
> recieve blocks like parameters..
>
Hi folks..
i found today, that xor: don't recieve a block and recibe aBoolean
i can guess, it is wrong, because, the other logic operations
recieve blocks like parameters..
I this a bug?
Best Regards
