It is OSProcess class>>trace and OSProcess class>>trace: so there
is no conflict at all. I mentioned it only as a data point.
I chose the name "trace" because it is used for debugging, and
the intent is to trace the flow of execution by putting e.g.
"OSProcess trace: 'the VM is about to core dump
On 06 Nov 2011, at 12:28, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
> can you publish the code and I will fill a bug entry.
> May be log: was added after.
This is nothing but a quick hack... I have not checked how that interacts all
the stuff I am not using in the Transcript
TranscriptModel>>#initialize
initi
In 14217
there is no TranscriptModel (I thought that we removed it from 1.3 too).
There is just ThreadSafeTranscript and no log: method there and it uses a Mutex
too.
So what I suggest is that if you want that we update the 1.3 version provide
code that we can just load.
LIke that we will integ
can you publish the code and I will fill a bug entry.
May be log: was added after.
On Nov 6, 2011, at 3:15 AM, Stefan Marr wrote:
>
> On 05 Nov 2011, at 22:37, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
>>
>> AddEntry: is a low level api.
>> Now I will check because there were some movements around transcript in
On 05 Nov 2011, at 22:37, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
>
> AddEntry: is a low level api.
> Now I will check because there were some movements around transcript in 1.3
> and may be some left over were not cleaned.
Ok, thanks, did not see the #log: the first time I looked at the class.
Is probably a
I like #trace: :).
Other I do not like so should be #record: or #writeDown: (ugly, hehe) :P
Why not just #newLine instead of #nl :(? Therer are 5 more characters but
I'm happier :P...
On Sat, Nov 5, 2011 at 6:37 PM, Stéphane Ducasse
wrote:
> Hi stefan
>
> >
> >> self log:
> >> self
did you check toothpick by joseph pelrine?
Because transcript is not a logger just an historical simple output place.
Stef
On Nov 5, 2011, at 5:00 PM, Milan Mimica wrote:
> Have you thought of a decent logging system with logging levels, output
> formatter and output appenders?
> Current logging
Hi stefan
>
>> self log:
>> self logCr:
>
> Why is it a rather platform specific CR? Why not some platform independent NL
> (new line)?
Indeed nl is better. I used Cr because people with
Transcript show: 'foo' ; cr and not nl as far as I know
> And in 1.3, I found the Transcript
Thanks david
I do not have OSProcess at hand, but where are these messages defined? On
Object?
Would it be a problem for you if we define trace and trace: on Object?
Stef
>>> Hi guys
>>>
>>> I introduce
>>> log to replace Transcript show: ?
>>> logCr and crLog
>>>
>>> Now stupidly
On Sat, Nov 05, 2011 at 02:38:14PM +0100, Norbert Hartl wrote:
>
> Am 05.11.2011 um 12:50 schrieb St?phane Ducasse:
>
> > Hi guys
> >
> > I introduce
> > log to replace Transcript show: ?
> > logCr and crLog
> >
> > Now stupidly I did not notice that it will capture log on number :(
Have you thought of a decent logging system with logging levels, output
formatter and output appenders?
Current logging sure comes handy, but is really rudimentary.
A business application must have a modern logging system, and it's not even
a complex thing to do.
I'm just asking whether you have di
Hi:
On 05 Nov 2011, at 15:54, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
> self log:
> self logCr:
Why is it a rather platform specific CR? Why not some platform independent NL
(new line)?
And in 1.3, I found the TranscriptModel with #addEntry: which looked like the
new way of doing things since #
ne Ducasse
> [stephane.duca...@inria.fr]
> Sent: Saturday, November 05, 2011 10:35 AM
> To: Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
> Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] about name for logging message
>
> yes could be a good candidate.
> let us see if other suggestions arrive
>
>
ts.gforge.inria.fr
[pharo-project-boun...@lists.gforge.inria.fr] on behalf of Stéphane Ducasse
[stephane.duca...@inria.fr]
Sent: Saturday, November 05, 2011 10:35 AM
To: Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] about name for logging message
yes could be a good cand
yes could be a good candidate.
let us see if other suggestions arrive
Stef
On Nov 5, 2011, at 2:38 PM, Norbert Hartl wrote:
>
> Am 05.11.2011 um 12:50 schrieb Stéphane Ducasse:
>
>> Hi guys
>>
>> I introduce
>> log to replace Transcript show: …
>> logCr and crLog
>>
>> Now stupi
Am 05.11.2011 um 12:50 schrieb Stéphane Ducasse:
> Hi guys
>
> I introduce
> log to replace Transcript show: …
> logCr and crLog
>
> Now stupidly I did not notice that it will capture log on number :( and also
> on collection,
>
> So any suggestion of what would be a nice logg
Hi guys
I introduce
log to replace Transcript show: …
logCr and crLog
Now stupidly I did not notice that it will capture log on number :( and also on
collection,
So any suggestion of what would be a nice logging message?
short and cool.
Stef
17 matches
Mail list logo
