(Object>>#name) isCollection = true
Actually is a subclass of ByteArray (instead of collaborating with one).
Does this seem strange to anybody else? Is it really needed?
Fernando
On 19 June 2012 10:27, Fernando Olivero wrote:
> (Object>>#name) isCollection = true
>
> Actually is a subclass of ByteArray (instead of collaborating with one).
>
> Does this seem strange to anybody else? Is it really needed?
Yes, I found it a bit strange:
http://bugs.squeak.org/view.php?id=7570
On Jun 19, 2012, at 11:28 AM, Fernando Olivero wrote:
> (Object>>#name) isCollection = true
>
> Actually is a subclass of ByteArray (instead of collaborating with one).
>
> Does this seem strange to anybody else? Is it really needed?
>
CompiledMethods are magical. They are highly optimized fo
Thanks for the info, its a shame we cant easily change the vm.
Oh well, i should first ask for isCompiledMethod before isCollection now...
Fernando
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 11:34 AM, Marcus Denker wrote:
>
> On Jun 19, 2012, at 11:28 AM, Fernando Olivero wrote:
>
>> (Object>>#name) isCollection
Frank Shearar wrote:
On 19 June 2012 10:27, Fernando Olivero wrote:
(Object>>#name) isCollection = true
Actually is a subclass of ByteArray (instead of collaborating with one).
Does this seem strange to anybody else? Is it really needed?
Yes, I found it a bit strange:
http://bugs.squeak.o
On 19.06.2012 11:46, Fernando Olivero wrote:
Thanks for the info, its a shame we cant easily change the vm.
Oh well, i should first ask for isCompiledMethod before isCollection now...
Fernando
Why?
I mean, each CompiledMethod IS a collection of bytes, even though those
bytes hold a special m
On 19 June 2012 14:33, Henrik Sperre Johansen
wrote:
> On 19.06.2012 11:46, Fernando Olivero wrote:
>>
>> Thanks for the info, its a shame we cant easily change the vm.
>>
>> Oh well, i should first ask for isCompiledMethod before isCollection
>> now...
>>
>> Fernando
>
>
> Why?
> I mean, each Com
It is historical to gain space. Now would be good to clean that but … not yet.
> Thanks for the info, its a shame we cant easily change the vm.
>>>
>>> Oh well, i should first ask for isCompiledMethod before isCollection
>>> now...
>>>
>>> Fernando
>>
>>
>> Why?
>> I mean, each CompiledMethod
On 19.06.2012 22:01, Igor Stasenko wrote:
On 19 June 2012 14:33, Henrik Sperre Johansen
wrote:
On 19.06.2012 11:46, Fernando Olivero wrote:
Thanks for the info, its a shame we cant easily change the vm.
Oh well, i should first ask for isCompiledMethod before isCollection
now...
Fernando
W
impressive :)
>> but it could live with basicAt:/basicAt:put: just well.
> Well, I tried changing it (proceeding all warnings not to do it) to a
> variableByteSubclass: of Object (which implements at:/at:put:).
> After recompileAll'ing, and then using a 1.4 image normally only a single
> sender
10 matches
Mail list logo