The project descriptions and the wiki entries are stored in the image.
On May 8, 2013 7:05 PM, "Paul DeBruicker" wrote:
> Are the project descriptions and wiki entries stored in the file system
> or the image?
>
>
> On 05/08/2013 09:07 AM, Andrei Vasile Chis wrote:
> > We were thinking of keeping
On May 8, 2013, at 6:11 PM, Andrei Vasile Chis
wrote:
> We can add a search based on project names.
> Also I'd like to create a virtual machine and move an instance of the
> SqueakSource image there.
> This way if in the future people will want to access any meta-information
> they could down
Are the project descriptions and wiki entries stored in the file system
or the image?
On 05/08/2013 09:07 AM, Andrei Vasile Chis wrote:
> We were thinking of keeping the current image alive for one or two more
> months.
> Then replace it with just a simple view of the file system.
>
>
> On Wed
Thanks Guille, will be interested to know how you get on with Glorp.
I've had a few issues since 1.4 where Glorp's tests didn't all pass in
the test runner (they did from the system browser and seemed to work
everywhere in 1.3) and it only seems to be getting worse still in 2.0 as
my HDTestRepo
We can add a search based on project names.
Also I'd like to create a virtual machine and move an instance of the
SqueakSource image there.
This way if in the future people will want to access any meta-information
they could download the virtual machine and get a running SqueakSource.
On Wed, May
Thanks. I will add this script to the front page of SqueakSource.
On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 5:55 PM, Damien Cassou wrote:
> On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 4:05 PM, Hilaire Fernandes
> wrote:
> > A small note or link in Squeaksource how to migrate to smaltalkhub will
> > be helpful.
>
>
> I agree. Somethin
We were thinking of keeping the current image alive for one or two more
months.
Then replace it with just a simple view of the file system.
On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 9:50 AM, stephane ducasse
wrote:
>
> On May 7, 2013, at 5:19 PM, Andrei Vasile Chis
> wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Given that Smallt
On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 4:05 PM, Hilaire Fernandes
wrote:
> A small note or link in Squeaksource how to migrate to smaltalkhub will
> be helpful.
I agree. Something like that would make sense for people who want to
get an exact copy of their project:
| source goSource destination goDestination f
2013/5/7 Andrei Vasile Chis
> I don't really think so. Read-only mode is perfect, you only waste time to
>> relaunch squeaksource when it crashes :)
>>
>
> We were thinking at something more dramatic, like killing the image and
> putting all the public
> licensed projects on some ftp (or somethi
On May 7, 2013, at 9:15 PM, Andrei Vasile Chis
wrote:
> I don't really think so. Read-only mode is perfect, you only waste time to
> relaunch squeaksource when it crashes :)
>
> We were thinking at something more dramatic, like killing the image and
> putting all the public
> licensed projec
On May 7, 2013, at 5:19 PM, Andrei Vasile Chis
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Given that SmalltalkHub is now stable we were considering to discontinue
> SqueakSource.
> Our idea is to provide a grace period of a couple of months to allow the
> current active users to migrate their projects to the new
A small note or link in Squeaksource how to migrate to smaltalkhub will
be helpful.
Thanks
Hilaire
Le 07/05/2013 17:19, Andrei Vasile Chis a écrit :
> Hi all,
>
> Given that SmalltalkHub is now stable we were considering to discontinue
> SqueakSource.
> Our idea is to provide a grace period of
12 matches
Mail list logo
