Oops, ive already done it, no 13122, can i somehow delete my issue?
werner
On 03/23/2014 10:06 PM, Sven Van Caekenberghe wrote:
Not necessary, there already is an old one:
https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/3748
Not necessary, there already is an old one:
https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/3748
Thanks for reporting this.
On 23 Mar 2014, at 21:54, Werner Kassens wrote:
> ok, i'll open an issue in the bugtracker
> werner
>
ok, i'll open an issue in the bugtracker
werner
There was an issue for pharo 1.3
http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3701
but it looks like it never found its way into any pharo version.
2014-03-23 18:45 GMT+01:00 Sven Van Caekenberghe :
> I think this is an oversight, but I know nothing about that plugin or its
> history. So th
I think this is an oversight, but I know nothing about that plugin or its
history. So the primitive should be used correctly. It is probably best to make
an issue.
On 23 Mar 2014, at 18:16, Werner Kassens wrote:
> Hi Ben,
> i stumbled upon
> https://github.com/smarr/RoarVM/blob/master/vm/src/
Hi Ben,
i stumbled upon
https://github.com/smarr/RoarVM/blob/master/vm/src/interpreter/obsolete_named_primitive_table.cpp
werner
On 03/23/2014 05:56 PM, Ben Coman wrote:
Sorry I'm not able to answer your question - but I'm curious with
your espoused lack of vm knowledge :) how did you fin
Werner Kassens wrote:
Hi,
i dont know anything about primitives or the vm, hence this could very
well be an extremely stupid question, but anyway:
i use pharo 2.0 Latest update: #20628 and (i think) pharo VM version:
3.9-7. (btw how do i look up the vm version?).
in the package Collections-
Hi,
i dont know anything about primitives or the vm, hence this could very
well be an extremely stupid question, but anyway:
i use pharo 2.0 Latest update: #20628 and (i think) pharo VM version:
3.9-7. (btw how do i look up the vm version?).
in the package Collections-Arithmetic there is thi
