Re: [Pharo-users] What should I do when I get a fogbugz "Fix review needed"?

2014-07-23 Thread Sean P. DeNigris
Tim Mackinnon wrote > then I’ve done “merge” (I’m still not clear on whether I should do merge > or load? You were correct. "Always" merge slices. - Cheers, Sean -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/What-should-I-do-when-I-get-a-fogbugz-Fix-review-needed-tp4769395p4769709

Re: [Pharo-users] Package Dependencies Analysis : new features

2014-07-23 Thread Hernán Morales Durand
Thanks Baptiste for taking care of this. Cheers, Hernán 2014-07-23 9:49 GMT-03:00 Baptiste Quide : > Hello Pharos Users, > > Since the first release of Package Dependencies Analysis, here is a > summary of improvements : > > - tool is available in World Menu (Tools > Package Dependencies Brows

Re: [Pharo-users] What should I do when I get a fogbugz "Fix review needed"?

2014-07-23 Thread Damien Cassou
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 5:10 PM, Tim Mackinnon wrote: > Can someone just clarify that for me? you should also mark it as "fix reviewed" -- Damien Cassou http://damiencassou.seasidehosting.st "Success is the ability to go from one failure to another without losing enthusiasm." Winston Churchil

[Pharo-users] Package Dependencies Analysis : new features

2014-07-23 Thread Baptiste Quide
Hello Pharos Users, Since the first release of Package Dependencies Analysis, here is a summary of improvements : - tool is available in World Menu (Tools > Package Dependencies Browser) : choose your packages and browse dependencies. - add/remove packages into the analysis. - you can refre

Re: [Pharo-users] Pharo launcher network error for Pharo 4.0 (beta)?

2014-07-23 Thread Ben Coman
Tim Mackinnon wrote: Yes its weird - I can view http://files.pharo.org/image/40/ fine in a web browser. It seems to affect 4.0 and 2.0. 3.0 and RModJenkins etc all expand correctly. The status bar was saying 4 network errors (although checking now, it says 7). It could be connectivity in this

Re: [Pharo-users] Refactoring project: improvements

2014-07-23 Thread Mark Rizun
Hi Gabriel, I agree with you that my "extract to temp" may be not really a refactoring anymore. And maybe you're right about adding extra option, I should think about it. Thanks Mark 2014-07-23 13:33 GMT+02:00 Gabriel Cotelli : > Hi Mark, > > Thanks for taking care of improving the refactoring

Re: [Pharo-users] Refactoring project: improvements

2014-07-23 Thread Gabriel Cotelli
Hi Mark, Thanks for taking care of improving the refactoring tools. Just a side note, if you modify the Extract to temporary refactoring to change all the references (as your blog post suggest) then exists cases when this is no longer a refactoring. If the extracted code has side effects is not t

Re: [Pharo-users] Filesystem bug or limitation?

2014-07-23 Thread Ben Coman
Juan Ignacio Vaccarezza wrote: Ben,   It worked like a charm with the noserverino!!   Thank you very much! Juan Good to know. Thanks for the feedback. cheers -ben On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 1:00 PM, wrote: Juan Ignacio V

Re: [Pharo-users] [ANN] ODBC package on STHub

2014-07-23 Thread stepharo
Thanks Torsten. Every little steps are cool and welcomed! On 23/7/14 12:42, Torsten Bergmann wrote: The ODBC package is now migrated from SqueakSource to SmalltalkHub and available under http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~PharoExtras/ODBC I also cleaned up a little bit and made some stuff wo

[Pharo-users] [ANN] ODBC package on STHub

2014-07-23 Thread Torsten Bergmann
The ODBC package is now migrated from SqueakSource to SmalltalkHub and available under http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~PharoExtras/ODBC I also cleaned up a little bit and made some stuff working on Pharo 3.0 again. You can now als easily load it from the config browser. Repo is open for contr