Re: [Pharo-users] Is RubMethodEditingExample supposed to work?

2015-10-01 20:52 GMT+02:00 Stephan Eggermont : > Is that supposed to be able to make changes to methods? > Maybe it was supposed to work but isn't finished? There is another example RubPluggableTextMorphExample That one can save changes. > > Stephan > > >

Re: [Pharo-users] Rubric events

--- Begin Message --- Hello Miguel, Did you tried to subscribe to RubTextUpdatedInModel through the model of the morph (and not directly the morph) ? Cheers Alain > On 30 Sep 2015, at 16:52, Miguel Campusano wrote: > > Hello, > I'm working on modifying the styling of

Re: [Pharo-users] Is RubMethodEditingExample supposed to work?

--- Begin Message --- Hello, I think It was only to show how to use Rubric for text editing. Alain > On 02 Oct 2015, at 08:27, Nicolai Hess wrote: > > > > 2015-10-01 20:52 GMT+02:00 Stephan Eggermont >: > Is that supposed to be

Re: [Pharo-users] Rubric events

This mails arrived here empty. > On 02 Oct 2015, at 08:36, Alain Plantec via Pharo-users > wrote: > > > > >

Re: [Pharo-users] Accessors vs instance variables

Hi, This is a bugbear for me. On 2015/09/30 09:35 PM, Lyn Headley wrote: Hello, As I understand it, in Smalltalk, the instance variables of a class C are "protected" - able to be referenced by methods of C or its subclasses, but not by other objects. This is a useful feature as it clearly

Re: [Pharo-users] Analysis/Visualizations of DBs

I would be happy to participate in such project :) Esteban A. Maringolo 2015-10-02 9:34 GMT-03:00 Torsten Bergmann : > Hi, > > we have many nice analysis and visualizations tools available (Moose, > Roassal, ViDi, ...) > Often it is focused on development or code. Also we have

Re: [Pharo-users] Analysis/Visualizations of DBs

On 02-10-15 14:34, Torsten Bergmann wrote: What I think of is a tool where (after connecting to a possibly unknown database) you can easily get/build an overview on the design, quality and data of the database (similar to what Moose, ViDi does for code). In general, this is difficult to do.

Re: [Pharo-users] Rubric events

Yes, I tried. For what I see is the that the text of the morph still have not been setter when this announcement is triggered On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 8:36 AM Alain Plantec via Pharo-users < pharo-users@lists.pharo.org> wrote: > Hello Miguel, > Did you tried to subscribe to RubTextUpdatedInModel

Re: [Pharo-users] Spec LabelModel's #font: and other styles

I think it is better to avoid setting absolute style info for labels, e.g. font size and color. This because system settings allow you to set, e.g. font size systemwide, and it would be ugly if suddenly some labels don’t obey. Now, what could be done is to set some attributes like ‘bigger’,

Re: [Pharo-users] Analysis/Visualizations of DBs

2015-10-02 14:34 GMT+02:00 Torsten Bergmann : > Hi, > > we have many nice analysis and visualizations tools available (Moose, > Roassal, ViDi, ...) > Often it is focused on development or code. Also we have refactoring tools. > > What would be cool would be to have some tool for

Re: [Pharo-users] GTInspector: add view tab for custom object

Hi Mark, There is an initializeView: method that you could you use to create a custom view composite roassal2 title: 'Complexity'; titleIcon: MooseIcons mooseSystemComplexity; initializeView: [ RTMondrian new ]; painting: [ :view :each | "build views" ] Does this help? Cheers, Andrei On Fri,

Re: [Pharo-users] GTInspector: add view tab for custom object

Yes, thanks for help. 2015-10-02 12:03 GMT+03:00 Andrei Chis : > Hi Mark, > > There is an initializeView: method that you could you use to create a > custom view > > composite roassal2 > title: 'Complexity'; > titleIcon: MooseIcons mooseSystemComplexity; >

[Pharo-users] GTInspector: add view tab for custom object

Hi everyone, I would like to extend GTInspector for custom object - add a roassal view tab. I found this kind of code to do this: gtInspectorViewIn: composite composite roassal2 title: 'View'; painting: [ :view | self viewOn: view ] The problem

Re: [Pharo-users] Is RubMethodEditingExample supposed to work?

On 02-10-15 08:27, Nicolai Hess wrote: Maybe it was supposed to work but isn't finished? There is another example RubPluggableTextMorphExample That one can save changes. Ah, then I'll take a look at that one Stephan

[Pharo-users] IS there TypePlug for Pharo or similar type annotation tool?

Hi, What options do we have in terms of type annotations in Pharo? I stumbled upon TypePlug this https://marcusdenker.de/talks/08ParisTypes/08ParisTypePlug.pdf (or rather this http://scg.unibe.ch/archive/masters/Hald07a.pdf ) which enabled type annotation for Squeak such as

Re: [Pharo-users] IS there TypePlug for Pharo or similar type annotation tool?

> Well my primary motivation is that I need annotated code to be able to do > full model reverse-engineering (that of itself is very hard task, however if > you work only on constrained models that you've forward-engineered or > control, it's significantly simpler). > In fact types are not

Re: [Pharo-users] IS there TypePlug for Pharo or similar type annotation tool?

Hi Peter! I see you are really motivated for having types in Pharo. This is great. The email you’ve sent a couple of days ago motivated me for continuing my effort. The two important design points of my implementation are as follow: (A) - Types are specified in the method comment.

Re: [Pharo-users] IS there TypePlug for Pharo or similar type annotation tool?

On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 9:03 PM, Alexandre Bergel wrote: > Hi Peter! > > I see you are really motivated for having types in Pharo. This is great. > Well my primary motivation is that I need annotated code to be able to do full model reverse-engineering (that of itself is

Re: [Pharo-users] Accessors vs instance variables

> > Nobody has shown me a good reason for their existence and I never use them > except where I'm forced to use them in Spec How so? Spec requires only read accessor for your (sub)components.

Re: [Pharo-users] Rubric events

On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 8:54 AM, Marcus Denker wrote: > This mails arrived here empty. > Interesting. Gmail says for that mail "{no text body}", but if I click on it I see the content: --- From: Alain Plantec To: