Necessary?
I can't see that. It seems patently wrong once you consider the cases that
cannot be supported.
On Dec 2, 2017 12:02, "Sven Van Caekenberghe" wrote:
>
>
> > On 2 Dec 2017, at 17:21, Peter Uhnák wrote:
> >
> > After much digging as to why my tests are timing out even though running
>
> On 2 Dec 2017, at 20:24, Sean P. DeNigris wrote:
>
> Peter Uhnák wrote
>> or you can use monticello with
>> "tonel://" scheme (in P61 you will need newest iirc metacello).
>
> Hmm. IMHO these implementation-revealing url schemes stink. IIRC there is a
> gitlocal:// in some contexts. This see
> On 2 Dec 2017, at 17:21, Peter Uhnák wrote:
>
> After much digging as to why my tests are timing out even though running
> directly was always fine... I found out that TestRunner's coverageRun is
> using #valueUnpreemptively to run all tests.
>
> The problem is that one of the tests is ret
Peter Uhnák wrote
> or you can use monticello with
> "tonel://" scheme (in P61 you will need newest iirc metacello).
Hmm. IMHO these implementation-revealing url schemes stink. IIRC there is a
gitlocal:// in some contexts. This seems a little better. Can't we
autodetect the format instead of havin
ok, I got it to work with gofer:
Gofer new
url: 'tonel:///home/hilaire/Travaux/Developpement/DrGeoII/trunk/src';
package: 'ConfigurationOfDrGeo';
load.
Le 01/12/2017 à 18:07, Hilaire a écrit :
I am using P7.
I already have a tonel export done[1], I need to find what is the
magic t
After much digging as to why my tests are timing out even though running
directly was always fine... I found out that TestRunner's coverageRun is
using #valueUnpreemptively to run all tests.
The problem is that one of the tests is retrieving something over network,
and that apparently doesn't go w
That was the problem. Thanks, Norbert!
Bernhard
> Am 02.12.2017 um 17:01 schrieb Norbert Hartl :
>
> That most probably means there are no files in the directory. If you create
> one then you will see.
>
> Norbert
>
>> Am 02.12.2017 um 15:02 schrieb Bernhard Pieber :
>>
>> Hi Norbert,
>>
>>
That most probably means there are no files in the directory. If you create one
then you will see.
Norbert
> Am 02.12.2017 um 15:02 schrieb Bernhard Pieber :
>
> Hi Norbert,
>
> I tried this in a 6.1 image but I only get a normal inspector. What do I miss?
>
> Bernhard
>
>> Am 26.11.2017 um
Hi Norbert,
I tried this in a 6.1 image but I only get a normal inspector. What do I miss?
Bernhard
> Am 26.11.2017 um 13:36 schrieb Norbert Hartl :
>
> Andy,
>
> I use the filesystem for it. Let‘s say you have a directory called „scripts“.
> If you inspect
>
> ‘scripts‘ asFileReference
>
>
