Because I posted a new link it was misinterpreted that the old one did not
work which is not the case. Yeah changing it back to the old one is the
right choice. I created the new one only for convenience but as I said we
already have a ton of invite links.
In any case the old one will remain and
Hi,
Here is an update of the work on Bloc, Brick and GT. As always, please do let
us know what you think.
Bloc:
- Improved the deletion in the text editor and covered the scenarios with
examples
- Worked on the text selection. Still work needed for selection to be
production ready:
Ok I changed the community web page to point to
http://discord.gg/Sj2rhxn
as in the flyer and other documents.
On Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 8:42 PM, Stephane Ducasse
wrote:
> Ok now I do not understand why the invite changed on the pharo web
> site (and I do not like the
Ok now I do not understand why the invite changed on the pharo web
site (and I do not like the here instead of the full name) because we
have to hover to get the information.
On Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 7:30 PM, Dimitris Chloupis
wrote:
> if you provide me the specific link of
I used the old one after being kicked. It worked.
Cheers,
Cedrick
> Le 11 mars 2018 à 19:30, Dimitris Chloupis a écrit :
>
> if you provide me the specific link of the invitation you are referring to, I
> can verify it for you that has not changed
>
> Our server
if you provide me the specific link of the invitation you are referring to,
I can verify it for you that has not changed
Our server currently has 26 invites with no expiration date. 2 of them are
created by me.
But yes if an invite is without expiration date it means it won't get
deleted.
The
Stéphane Ducasse wrote
> Now does anybody implemented in Pharo the SUnit extension?
Sorry I missed this and just found it while porting my implementation to GH:
https://github.com/seandenigris/Validation-Revisited HTH
-
Cheers,
Sean
--
Sent from:
did the invitation changed?
Because we will have to update books flyers and others.
So is there a way to keep the invitation link stable?
Stef
On Sat, Mar 10, 2018 at 11:48 AM, Dimitris Chloupis
wrote:
> Hey guys after my mistake we got "hacked" and someone banned all our
Hi Hannes,
On 11 March 2018 at 17:49, H. Hirzel wrote:
> The first solution given by Sven works fine.
>
> dir := FileSystem workingDirectory / '..' / 'public'.
> dir ensureCreateDirectory.
> (dir / 'myFile.txt') writeStreamDo: [ :out | out << 'Hello World!'
The first solution given by Sven works fine.
dir := FileSystem workingDirectory / '..' / 'public'.
dir ensureCreateDirectory.
(dir / 'myFile.txt') writeStreamDo: [ :out | out << 'Hello World!' ].
The second version
obj := (FileSystem workingDirectory / '..' / 'public' /
> On 11 Mar 2018, at 10:39, john pfersich wrote:
>
> or try
>
> dir := (FileSystem workingDirectory / '..' / 'public' / 'testing' /
> 'test2.txt') ensureCreateFile.
> dir writeStream.
Indeed!
> On Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 1:16 AM, Sven Van Caekenberghe
or try
dir := (FileSystem workingDirectory / '..' / 'public' / 'testing' /
'test2.txt') ensureCreateFile.
dir writeStream.
On Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 1:16 AM, Sven Van Caekenberghe wrote:
>
>
> > On 11 Mar 2018, at 09:42, H. Hirzel wrote:
> >
> > Hello
> >
Works on Ubuntu 16.04
Sent from my iPhone
Encrypted email at jgpfers...@protonmail.com
> On Mar 10, 2018, at 12:38, Cyril Ferlicot wrote:
>
>
>> On sam. 10 mars 2018 at 21:36, H. Hirzel wrote:
>> Yes, #ensureCreateDirectory is available.
>>
> On 11 Mar 2018, at 09:42, H. Hirzel wrote:
>
> Hello
>
> This is a follow up question to 'How do I make sure a directory exists?'
>
> The answer to that question was
>
> dir := FileSystem workingDirectory / '..' / 'public'.
> dir ensureCreateDirectory.
Hello
This is a follow up question to 'How do I make sure a directory exists?'
The answer to that question was
dir := FileSystem workingDirectory / '..' / 'public'.
dir ensureCreateDirectory.
Now I want to create a writeStream.
dir writeStream
gives 'Unable to open
15 matches
Mail list logo