Re: [Pharo-users] Packaging question

2018-03-16 Thread Stephane Ducasse
Ok I will go for the compile time and remove the package so that this is even more stupid to manage. On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 8:24 PM, Guillermo Polito wrote: > Well, one baseline with many groups or many baselines would like... From a > metacello perspective, I'd do one baseline with several gro

Re: [Pharo-users] Pharo News Page Outage

2018-03-16 Thread Marcus Denker
Hi,Thanks, I guess that there is a bug / invalid content somehow that leads to an error.We should improve the blog in general: it uses right now a home-grown blog (part of the website), but it is a bit complex(just that little bit too much) to really post a lot… MarcusOn 16 Mar 2018, at 00:27, joh

Re: [Pharo-users] What is Reef? (was: Tide/Amber)

2018-03-16 Thread Stephane Ducasse
Yes Willow works on top of seaside and I would love to have also a seaside extension with more push techno On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 2:40 PM, Esteban A. Maringolo wrote: > Oh my goodness. Willow works ON TOP of Seaside? > > I always thought it was a separate project using some of its concepts > (

Re: [Pharo-users] Ever growing image

2018-03-16 Thread Hilaire
Okay, may be I just understood wrongly what it is about, or my expectation are not correctly aligned. Le 13/03/2018 à 19:22, Stephane Ducasse a écrit : Hilaire I do not have the answer and I do not know but you should have a look at the bash script. Because this is where the logic is. I will

Re: [Pharo-users] confusion about GTFilter hierarchy and GTFilterSubstring

2018-03-16 Thread Tudor Girba
Hi, I am not sure I understand the confusion. The filter is a strategy used to select objects. GTFilterSubstring filters based on finding the input string as a substring in the string representation of the objects. You do not see a difference because by default, the logic is a substring matchi

Re: [Pharo-users] Disabling GTSpotter dive in

2018-03-16 Thread Peter Uhnák
correction: spotterForRenderingShapesFor: is not in Pharo 6.1 (it's added by Roassal2GT) On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 8:01 AM, Peter Uhnák wrote: > Hi, > > is it possible to disable GTSpotter dive in functionality when the result > would be empty? > > I've tried looking at GTSpotterStep>>canDiveIn:

[Pharo-users] Disabling GTSpotter dive in

2018-03-16 Thread Peter Uhnák
Hi, is it possible to disable GTSpotter dive in functionality when the result would be empty? I've tried looking at GTSpotterStep>>canDiveIn: but it seems that no matter what there will be at least one processor (at least the "parent" one, which is weird). Also there are two spotter extensions d