On 04/21/2018 08:25 PM, Gregg Williams wrote:
> Hi—I’m a beginner in Pharo
Hi Gregg, welcome!
> and am working my way through Pharo by Example 5.0 (PbE) and Learning OOP and
> TDD with Pharo (LOTWP).
>
> I’m currently going through 7.4 Designing a test, in LOTWP, which covers
> testing whether a
--- Begin Message ---
>What I find sad is that people spent hours talking instead of doing.
>This is why Smalltalk is for them.
>Personally I prefer Pharo.
Well, I guess I don't belong here anymore since "Pharo is NOT Smalltalk" as you
keep saying!
And since I've been a Smalltalker for only 25
Hi—I’m a beginner in Pharo and am working my way through Pharo by Example 5.0
(PbE) and Learning OOP and TDD with Pharo (LOTWP).
I’m currently going through 7.4 Designing a test, in LOTWP, which covers
testing whether a string has no repeated characters, adding the method String
>> isIsogramSet
Thanks Sean! This is really a great review!
I owe you one!
Alexandre
> On Apr 21, 2018, at 9:16 PM, Sean P. DeNigris wrote:
>
> abergel wrote
>> Feedback is very welcome.
>
> Copy edit pass on Chapters 1 & 2:
> https://github.com/AgileArtificialIntelligence/AgileArtificialIntelligence.github.
abergel wrote
> Feedback is very welcome.
Copy edit pass on Chapters 1 & 2:
https://github.com/AgileArtificialIntelligence/AgileArtificialIntelligence.github.io/pull/2
A few more observations on Chapter 2 requiring deeper investigation:
- When you introduce the #assert:equals:, it would be great
I can find no reference to #min:max: in Dolphin X6.1.
Peter Kenny
-Original Message-
From: Pharo-users On Behalf Of Hilaire
Sent: 21 April 2018 17:36
To: pharo-users@lists.pharo.org
Subject: Re: [Pharo-users] min:max:
The #min:max: message is present in the Squeak/Pharo/Cuis familly bu
Herby Vojčík wrote
> … detectMin: [ :x | x ]
Or `detectMin: #yourself` if you prefer
-
Cheers,
Sean
--
Sent from: http://forum.world.st/Pharo-Smalltalk-Users-f1310670.html
The #min:max: message is present in the Squeak/Pharo/Cuis familly but
not in GNU Smalltalk for example. No idea about the other ones.
Le 21/04/2018 à 00:12, Chris Cunningham a écrit :
A name like this would be clearer (although much more annoying):
returnAtLeast: minValue butNoMoreThan: maxVa
What I find sad is that people spent hours talking instead of doing.
This is why Smalltalk is for them.
Personally I prefer Pharo.
Let me migrate another Seaside chapter so that people can complain after all.
Stef
On Sat, Apr 21, 2018 at 11:48 AM, Peter Uhnák wrote:
> How a project is named is
Yes :)
On Sat, Apr 21, 2018 at 4:21 PM, Sven Van Caekenberghe wrote:
>
>
>> On 21 Apr 2018, at 15:35, Stephane Ducasse wrote:
>>
>> Oh yes
>>
>> On Sat, Apr 21, 2018 at 12:12 AM, Chris Cunningham
>> wrote:
>>> A name like this would be clearer (although much more annoying):
>>>
>>> returnA
Note: no need for #collect:thenFold: family, one can implement min as
min
^ self detectMin: [ :x | x ]
if you want to reuse existing one.
But actually, the issue is, min: and max: are not there (correctly) for
strings.
Herby
Richard O'Keefe wrote:
#('a' 'b' 'c') min
also fails on the
> On 21 Apr 2018, at 15:35, Stephane Ducasse wrote:
>
> Oh yes
>
> On Sat, Apr 21, 2018 at 12:12 AM, Chris Cunningham
> wrote:
>> A name like this would be clearer (although much more annoying):
>>
>> returnAtLeast: minValue butNoMoreThan: maxValue
>>10 returnAtLeast: 12 butNoMoreTha
Oh yes
On Sat, Apr 21, 2018 at 12:12 AM, Chris Cunningham
wrote:
> A name like this would be clearer (although much more annoying):
>
> returnAtLeast: minValue butNoMoreThan: maxValue
> 10 returnAtLeast: 12 butNoMoreThan: 48
>
> Thanks,
> cbc
>
> On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 12:51 PM, Hilaire
On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 9:51 PM, Hilaire wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Out of curiosity.
>
> I always found the #min:max: confusing and lost in its expressiveness.
>
> One should write:
>
> 10 min: 48 max: 12
I do not understand the result :)
To me this method is illnamed.
>
> to expect 12.
>
> but logi
Hi richard
do you have some tests around?
Stef
On Sat, Apr 21, 2018 at 3:07 PM, Richard O'Keefe wrote:
> #('a' 'b' 'c') min
> also fails on the grounds that ByteStrings don't understand #min:.
> What's worse is that ByteString and ByteSymbol *do* have #max:,
> but it's something quite different
#('a' 'b' 'c') min
also fails on the grounds that ByteStrings don't understand #min:.
What's worse is that ByteString and ByteSymbol *do* have #max:,
but it's something quite different (and arguably broken).
max: aBlock
| max |
self ifEmpty: [ ^ nil ].
max := aBlock value: self first.
I looked hard at #min:max: some years ago and decided it
was way too confusing to ever use. My own library has
Magnitude>>
median: lower and: upper
"I considered adding a method
clampedBetween: lower and: upper
^self < lower ifTrue: [lower] ifFalse: [
upper
> On 21 Apr 2018, at 13:18, Hilaire wrote:
>
> Not in my working P7 image. Is it a recent change?
Yes, relatively recent, weeks I guess, maybe a month, at least since half March.
FileSystem (part of the image for ages), File and new streams (most also long
part of the image) are the replacem
Not in my working P7 image. Is it a recent change?
Hilaire
Le 21/04/2018 à 13:01, Sven Van Caekenberghe a écrit :
The whole of FileStream is deprecated in P7, use
[Abstract]FileReference>>#fileIn:
--
Dr. Geo
http://drgeo.eu
> On 21 Apr 2018, at 10:34, Hilaire wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> To use Smalltalk sketch scripts for additional unit tests, I need to file in
> these script files.
>
> I found FileStream>>fileIn: does the job. Is it the proper way to do it?
The whole of FileStream is deprecated in P7, use
[Abstract]
Ah yes, it does it.
Thanks
Le 21/04/2018 à 11:58, Cyril Ferlicot a écrit :
I don't have a computer to check but inside the test you should be
able to call a method as #timeLimit:. I'm not sure of the name.
--
Dr. Geo
http://drgeo.eu
On sam. 21 avr. 2018 at 11:55, Hilaire wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a test taking more than the 10 seconds limit to execute completely.
>
> I tried to adjust this limit but failed to get it taken in
> consideration. I tried from 3 places:
>
> - in the test method itself
>
> - in TestCase setUp
>
> - i
Hi,
I have a test taking more than the 10 seconds limit to execute completely.
I tried to adjust this limit but failed to get it taken in
consideration. I tried from 3 places:
- in the test method itself
- in TestCase setUp
- in a dedicated TestResources
The adjustment seems to alway been
How a project is named is a choice of the author. Nobody gets to demand how
someone should name their projects.
Now how project is actually named is not a issue if it is properly handled
on pharo side, which in some places is, in some places isn't.
For instance, there's a gazillion UI frameworks
Cool I will have a look when I go back to Magritte
Rafael if you see mistake in the booklet please report them to me.
I will do a pass in a couple of weeks I hope
On Sat, Apr 21, 2018 at 4:07 AM, Sean P. DeNigris wrote:
> Rafael Luque wrote
>> I wonder if there are other relevant projects I could
I think so
On Sat, Apr 21, 2018 at 10:34 AM, Hilaire wrote:
> Hi,
>
> To use Smalltalk sketch scripts for additional unit tests, I need to file in
> these script files.
>
> I found FileStream>>fileIn: does the job. Is it the proper way to do it?
>
> Thanks
>
> Hilaire
>
> --
> Dr. Geo
> http://dr
Hi,
To use Smalltalk sketch scripts for additional unit tests, I need to
file in these script files.
I found FileStream>>fileIn: does the job. Is it the proper way to do it?
Thanks
Hilaire
--
Dr. Geo
http://drgeo.eu
Hi
I decided to start to migrate the Seaside book to Pillar and make it a
community-oriented book.
I will work regularly on it and offer it as a gift to the community.
https://github.com/SquareBracketAssociates/DynamicWebDevelopmentWithSeaside
If some of you want to join the effort, you are welc
28 matches
Mail list logo
