Re: [Pharo-users] What is the actual way of managing code in Pharo

Monticello - packages code Metacello - dependency management between packages Iceberg - GUI for loading code via git Currently, the cutting edge is to use Iceberg to load Metacello projects which load Monticello packages, although there are other options (e.g. old-school MCZ repos instead of git)

Re: [Pharo-users] Spec + Graphics?

--- Begin Message --- Dan Wilczak wrote > I'm interested in using Pharo to create a simulation Sounds like a cool project! Dan Wilczak wrote > Can I use Spec for such a thing? Yes, for the vanilla parts you described e.g. toolbar Dan Wilczak wrote > I don't see any way to embed a graphical >

Re: [Pharo-users] subpackages in P7

Peter Uhnak wrote > That's why MyPackage-Test is best kept separate, because when other > project > is loading your project, they don't need to load such package Just to give another angle, while everything said in this thread is true, I typically start with a monolithic package + sub tags and

Re: [Pharo-users] Unable to compile myself Pharo

On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 07:15:22PM +0100, Alexandre Garreau wrote: > But I saw the bootstrap process involve redownloading a binary image > anyway… I’d have just prefered to recompile it to be sure, as I’m > usually more comfortable with this idea. Normally compiling a new > language is —though

[Pharo-users] What is the actual way of managing code in Pharo

Hi there, I am trying the new Pharo 7 and a very elemental question arose. What I should use to manage my code? Monticello Metacello Iceberg It seems I am quite confused regarding the role of each of these tools. Documentation, I am afraid, does not apply to Pharo 7. The chapters covering

Re: [Pharo-users] Loading Metacello with Seaside

It worked, appears to be an error with Magritte so. I wish I had this page describing how to use Baselines three months ago! It is VERY well made. :) On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 4:45 PM Vitor Medina Cruz wrote: > "I tried to load magritte only and I got the same problem. Maybe I do not >> have it

Re: [Pharo-users] UFFI and opaque(ish) types

> On 30 Nov 2018, at 19:50, phil--- via Pharo-users > wrote: > > > From: "p...@highoctane.be" > Subject: Re: [Pharo-users] UFFI and opaque(ish) types > Date: 30 November 2018 at 19:50:03 CET > To: Any question about pharo is welcome > > > Inherit from FFIOpaqueObject > > + initialize

Re: [Pharo-users] [squeak-dev] Named serial port bug and how to contribute

Thanks for the clarification. On Windows 10, I also had problems. Managed on one occasion to get firmata isConnected to return True, but writing to a port had no effect. I got multiple error messages; I think one of them referenced a SerialPiort primitive, consistent with your findings.

Re: [Pharo-users] UFFI and opaque(ish) types

--- Begin Message --- Inherit from FFIOpaqueObject + initialize TypeMap I have a few here: https://github.com/Pharophile/XmppTalk https://github.com/Pharophile/XmppTalk/tree/master/packages/XmppTalk-ExternalStructures.package

Re: [Pharo-users] Unable to compile myself Pharo

Hi, I tried to compile itself because I’m usually incomfortable with using binaries downloaded from the internet whose sources couldn’t be checked afterwards. I don’t know the status of Pharo regarding Deterministic Builds, but I have come anyway to become more comfortable in trusting what comes

[Pharo-users] UFFI and opaque(ish) types

How are opaque(ish) types normally handled in UFFI (or FFI)? E.g. if I want to use libstuff which defines the following structure: struct stuffstruct { typeA a; typeB b; } stufftype; I might know they're integers, but not the size, signed vs. unsigned, etc. The definitions of

Re: [Pharo-users] Reify RBLiteralNode and RBBlockNode args/return with MetaLink?

--- Begin Message --- >> >> Steven did a version that is based on AST transformation only, we will >> explore that direction further in the future. > > Interesting, so this would be the one I'd like to see (because I > implemented with AST transforms). Would you have a link to his work? > Mine

Re: [Pharo-users] Lambda World 2018 - What FP can learn from Smalltalk by Aditya Siram

Would it be easy to make Smalltalk ideal for Functional Programming so that the FP community is attracted to the Smalltalk IDE? It would be a shame for them to invent another half baked IDE. All the best, Aik-Siong Koh -- Sent from: http://forum.world.st/Pharo-Smalltalk-Users-f1310670.html

Re: [Pharo-users] Reify RBLiteralNode and RBBlockNode args/return with MetaLink?

Le ven. 30 nov. 2018 à 10:31, Marcus Denker a écrit : > > > > > On 29 Nov 2018, at 12:55, Thierry Goubier wrote: > > > > Le jeu. 29 nov. 2018 à 11:15, Marcus Denker a > > écrit : > >> > >> > >> > >>> On 29 Nov 2018, at 10:45, Thierry Goubier > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>> Hi Manuel, > >>> > >>>

Re: [Pharo-users] Reify RBLiteralNode and RBBlockNode args/return with MetaLink?

> On 29 Nov 2018, at 12:55, Thierry Goubier wrote: > > Le jeu. 29 nov. 2018 à 11:15, Marcus Denker a écrit : >> >> >> >>> On 29 Nov 2018, at 10:45, Thierry Goubier wrote: >>> >>> Hi Manuel, >>> >>> would that extend to testing what happens if you add many, many >>> metalinks in a