My code creates a mail message and adds it to a collection.
Then in a forked process I read the collection of messages one by one and
attempt to send them.
It uses a timer to wait and try again, stopping only when the message
collection is empty.
I can share my code (it's far from enterprise
+100. Smalltalk for me is a hobby which comes after the music (guitar and
keyboards) and gun habits. I used to code in Smalltalk professionally, but
haven’t had a paid job in 26 years. I used to produce code for Squeak back in
the early 2000’s, but stopped because my code never made it into the
Since JRMPC opens for registration in three days, I can't afford to screw
around with the web server at this late date. Had I known about this issue
earlier in the year (say, May or June), I could've dealt with it then.
All I'm looking for is a workaround, a duct tape solution.
Sven Van
> On 1 Sep 2019, at 23:06, horrido wrote:
>
> This didn't fix the issue. It's not a matter of adjusting timeout values.
>
> However, I believe I've resolved the matter, more or less. You see, I think
> the problem is with Gmail...
>
> My Teapot application is using
>
> On 3 Sep 2019, at 00:54, Jeff Gray wrote:
>
> Have you tried manually opening up the gmail account you are sending from in
> the browser and looking for anything funny? I have had similar issues where
> the gmail was needing a security prompt/response.
> I wrote a service to send mails
Ad 1.
To cut a long story short,
the ANSI Smalltalk standard is the nearest thing we have to a clear
specification
of the nearest thing we have to a consensus.
One of the reasons that Smalltalk gets less use than many of us would
like
is that it can be extremely unpleasant trying to
I’ve replied to David in discord - but in case anyone else comes looking - the
upgrade path for the first versions of exercism is documented in the
instruction for Pharo in the exercism track. This should resolve most problems
listed below.
The move to a package per exercise was driven by
