[Pharo-users] Segfault with ZnClient and https

2021-04-20 Thread Petter
Hi, I have trouble with latest Fedora 33, plain installation and Pharo 8.0 stable, 64 bit. When I try a ZnClient new url: 'https://something..'; get. The image segfaults. Last lines from log are: primitiveSSL:setStringProperty:toValue: atAllPut: atAllPut:

[Pharo-users] Re: Seaside disappearing under Windows

2021-04-20 Thread David Pennington
I am sure that I do. In any case both the Windows machines have double the memory of the Mac and the Mac is still going.On 20 Apr 2021 16:13, Sven Van Caekenberghe wrote:David, > On 20 Apr 2021, at 17:01, David Pennington wrote: > > I have finally given up on trying to sort this out. Under

[Pharo-users] Re: Seaside disappearing under Windows

2021-04-20 Thread Sven Van Caekenberghe
David, > On 20 Apr 2021, at 17:01, David Pennington wrote: > > I have finally given up on trying to sort this out. Under both Windows Server > 2012 and Windows 10 my Pharo image just exits leaving nothing, not even a > crash file. Hence, I have fixed my MacBookAir so that it stays alive with

[Pharo-users] Re: Seaside disappearing under Windows

2021-04-20 Thread David Pennington
I have finally given up on trying to sort this out. Under both Windows Server 2012 and Windows 10 my Pharo image just exits leaving nothing, not even a crash file. Hence, I have fixed my MacBookAir so that it stays alive with the lid down and I am now using that as my Seaside server. It has

[Pharo-users] Re: Help Needed: Looking for projects to use in a study of transforming deprecations

2021-04-20 Thread Oleksandr Zaitsev
Richard O'Keefe wrote > Surely this is back to front? #includesAllOf: reads well and is > compatible with GNU Smalltalk (and classic Squeak), while #includesAll: > doesn't work in most of the Smalltalks I have access to. > > My own library has > {includes,excludes}{All,Any,None,One}Of: > which

[Pharo-users] Re: Help Needed: Looking for projects to use in a study of transforming deprecations

2021-04-20 Thread Oleksandr Zaitsev
gcotelli wrote > We have several projects in the Buenos Aires Smalltalk group that can > match > (we provide in fact a migration package when breaking backward > compatibility including transformation rules so you have a human benchmark > to compare). Thanks a lot Gabriel and Serge! I will run my