Hi Cyril, It does not look that different. Something I may recommend, is that Pillar should be effective at writing other things than a book. So, the chapter decomposition should not be forced.
Cheers, Alexandre -- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. > On May 4, 2015, at 7:38 AM, Cyril Ferlicot <cyril.ferli...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi, > I'm currently working on the way we manage the input files and the output > files. > The way we manage the files now makes hard some improvement of Pillar. > That's why with Damien we though about makes some changes. The changes > are big so I wanted to talk about that with you. > We propose to have always 1 file with all the work inside. That can > use the inputFile tag. For example: > > "${inputFile:Chapter1.pillar}$ > > ${inputFile:Chapter2.pillar}$ > > ${inputFile:Chapter3.pillar}$ > > ${inputFile:Chapter4.pillar}$" > > And the option "separateOutputFiles" will now create 1 file each time > we have a new Chapter. (!Level 1 header). > That will make simpler the way to number everything and to create > anchor because those 2 doesn't work well with the "separateOutputFile" > option. > > What do you thing? That would be good with you? > > -- > Cheers > Cyril Ferlicot > _______________________________________________ > Moose-dev mailing list > moose-...@iam.unibe.ch > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
