On Jul 30, 2013, at 12:47 AM, José Comesaña wrote:
> I think so. I think Stef created 10869 and I 10870. I had made the
> corrections and written the tests. Anyway, it is possible that I had made it
> bad. I thought I had commited the slice, but...
>
> If you tell me how, I will do it again.
I think so. I think Stef created 10869 and I 10870. I had made the
corrections and written the tests. Anyway, it is possible that I had made
it bad. I thought I had commited the slice, but...
If you tell me how, I will do it again.
Regards
2013/7/29 Marcus Denker
>
> On Jul 29, 2013, at 2:34
On Jul 29, 2013, at 2:34 PM, José Comesaña wrote:
> It was already discussed and modified:
> https://pharo.fogbugz.com/default.asp?10869
>
This one is just an open report… no action was done. I have merged it into
Issue 11222
But there is a third issue about exactly the same, this I think
It was already discussed and modified:
https://pharo.fogbugz.com/default.asp?10869
Regards
2013/7/24 Sabine Knöfel
> Hi,
>
> Date readFrom: '4.2.13' readStream pattern: 'd.m.yy'
>
> Does not return 4.2.2013 but 4.2.0013
>
> The comment is saying
> "A year given using only two decimals is consid
On 24 Jul 2013, at 18:20, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
> I remember that once camillo suggested to use the same approach as in dart
> where you can specify a strategy.
The ZTimestamp package contains such an example-based parser/formatter (load
from the config browser or from
http://www.smalltalk
I remember that once camillo suggested to use the same approach as in dart
where you can specify a strategy.
> I agree
>
> The comment of mmdd is saying
> "Format the date in ISO 8601 standard like '2002-10-22'
> The result is of fixed size 10 characters long.."
>
> so
I agree
The comment of mmdd is saying
"Format the date in ISO 8601 standard like '2002-10-22'
The result is of fixed size 10 characters long.."
so I would say the selector is not choosen very careful.
There is a discussion in Fogbuz about >>readFrom:pattern:
https://pharo.fog
I also hate #mmdd
Date today mmdd -> '2013-07-24'
I would expect '20130724'
Cheers,
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 5:59 AM, Sabine Knöfel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I created a bug, hoping that I filled out every field correctly.
>
>
> https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/11222/Date-readFrom-pattern-year
Hi,
I created a bug, hoping that I filled out every field correctly.
https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/11222/Date-readFrom-pattern-year-2-decimals-not-20xx-but-00xx
Sabine
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 9:52 AM, Stéphane Ducasse [via Smalltalk]
wrote:
> Hello Sabine
> probably a bug.
> If you can wri
Hello Sabine
probably a bug.
If you can write some tests and publish them on the bugtracker this will help.
If you provide the fix (it will be faster to get it fixed) please run the tests
to make sure that we do not
introduce side effects.
Stef
> Hi,
>
> Date readFrom: '4.2.13' readStream patte
Hi,
Date readFrom: '4.2.13' readStream pattern: 'd.m.yy'
Does not return 4.2.2013 but 4.2.0013
The comment is saying
"A year given using only two decimals is considered to be >2000"
So, the comment is not ok or this is a bug?
Sabine
--
View this message in context:
http://forum.world.st/Bu
11 matches
Mail list logo
