Stephan Eggermont writes:
> Groups might be evil, but many configurations is worse :)
> You are depending on the wrong configurations. In Pharo 5
> you need to depend on ConfigurationOfGTSpotter and
> ConfigurationOfGTInspectorCore
thank you.
--
Damien Cassou
http://damiencassou.seasidehosti
Hi,
GTInspector is well done :).
If you only want what is in Pharo, you depend on GTInspectorCore.
Cheers,
Doru
On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 8:58 AM, stepharo wrote:
> This is because the configurationOfGTInspector is not well done (it
> probably uses groups) but groups are evil :)
> May be dami
On 21-09-15 08:58, stepharo wrote:
This is because the configurationOfGTInspector is not well done (it
probably uses groups) but groups are evil :)
Groups might be evil, but many configurations is worse :)
You are depending on the wrong configurations. In Pharo 5
you need to depend on Configura
This is because the configurationOfGTInspector is not well done (it
probably uses groups) but groups are evil :)
May be damien you should depend on one of the group of GTInspector (if
any).
Normally we should getting Unit GTInspectorCore and a bundle GTInspector
that may use by people to load
e
Hi,
my project depends on GTSpotter and GTInspector which are already in
Pharo. How do I describe these dependencies in my ConfigurationOf so
that Metacello does no load them? I did
spec
configuration: 'GTInspector'
with:
[ spec
version: #stable;
