Re: [Pharo-users] Interogation about recursivity or sequential

2016-01-09 Thread stepharo
I propose this as an exercise. Now I was not aware that we have doubleLinkedList in the system. I do not get why DoubleLinkedList is packaged in System-Caching and not Collections-DoubleLinkedList? https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/17360/DoubleLinkedList-should-be-packaged-in-Collections-DoubleL

Re: [Pharo-users] Interogation about recursivity or sequential

2016-01-05 Thread Alexandre Bergel
Recursivity is usually better to read, understand. However sequential is usually more efficient (but harder to implement right). Cheers, Alexandre > On Jan 4, 2016, at 6:11 PM, Yann Dubois wrote: > > Hello World, Happy new year 2016 ! > > I actually work on an integration of a double linked l

Re: [Pharo-users] Interogation about recursivity or sequential

2016-01-04 Thread Peter Uhnák
Wouldn't it be better to improve the current (Double)LinkedList instead of creating new ones? DLL had some improvements recently and I am not aware that it's missing something. On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 10:34 PM, Sven Van Caekenberghe wrote: > Hi Yann, > > > On 04 Jan 2016, at 22:11, Yann Dubois w

Re: [Pharo-users] Interogation about recursivity or sequential

2016-01-04 Thread Sven Van Caekenberghe
Hi Yann, > On 04 Jan 2016, at 22:11, Yann Dubois wrote: > > Hello World, Happy new year 2016 ! And to you too. > I actually work on an integration of a double linked list on Pharo and I have > a little interogation. > It's better to use recursivity or senquential algorithm ? Recursive is oft

[Pharo-users] Interogation about recursivity or sequential

2016-01-04 Thread Yann Dubois
Hello World, Happy new year 2016 ! I actually work on an integration of a double linked list on Pharo and I have a little interogation. It's better to use recursivity or senquential algorithm ? Yann