Re: [Pharo-users] Monticello diff between image and tonel repo

2019-02-18 Thread Hilaire
I confirm again this issue, while annoying, flushing Monticello helps to get a proper diff. https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/issues/2583 Hilaire Le 16/02/2019 à 11:56, Hilaire a écrit : > Closing Monticello windows and opening a fresh one helped to get the > changes right, sometime... Othe

Re: [Pharo-users] Monticello diff between image and tonel repo

2019-02-16 Thread Hilaire
Hi Ben, I am not looking at you reproducing the scenario (you asked for) as it is some work and the outcome may not be reliable as you mentioned it. Nevertheless, the steps I described will likely get you on the trouble and are easy to get in. But more on sharing experience on this topic, as I me

Re: [Pharo-users] Monticello diff between image and tonel repo

2019-02-16 Thread Ben Coman
Le 16/02/2019 à 07:23, Ben Coman a écrit : > Its hard to determine what is wrong from the screen shot. > I'm probably not the one able to provide an answer, > but anyway... can you provide steps-to-reproduce in a fresh Image? On Sat, 16 Feb 2019 at 16:49, Hilaire wrote: > Hi Ben, > > The screens

Re: [Pharo-users] Monticello diff between image and tonel repo

2019-02-16 Thread Hilaire
Hi Ben, The screenshot shows two things: 1. In the top (black background), it shows the first lines of the file 'DrGAngle3ptsOrientedItem.class.st' from the tonel repository, in the DrGeoII-Core tonel package. In this source, you see a 'CostumeClasse' method. 2. In the second half o

Re: [Pharo-users] Monticello diff between image and tonel repo

2019-02-15 Thread Ben Coman
Its hard to determine what is wrong from the screen shot. I'm probably not the one able to provide an answer, but anyway... can you provide steps-to-reproduce in a fresh Image? cheers -ben On Sat, 16 Feb 2019 at 06:13, Hilaire wrote: > Hi, > > I think I already report it but I still see this i