On 10 July 2013 00:07, Usman Bhatti usman.bha...@gmail.com wrote:
Tx igor.
Now I am waiting to get hold of the new VM (with this parameter) to test on
Windows.
yes, i am building it right now on my machine to test if it works,
and jenkins refuses to build it (but for other reasons, which we
Wow!
This is really exciting.
Thanks a lot, Igor. I value this help even more knowing how you feel about the
modification. Or maybe you changed your mind in the meantime? :)
Cheers,
Doru
On Jul 10, 2013, at 1:35 PM, Igor Stasenko siguc...@gmail.com wrote:
On 10 July 2013 00:07, Usman
On 8 July 2013 22:43, Tudor Girba tu...@tudorgirba.com wrote:
Hi,
Igor, please get this point of view out of your system :).
First, not all programming languages are like this: You can easily run other
VMs (e.g., Java) with more than 3 GB. But, let's not even go there: I can run
Pharo
First, not all programming languages are like this: You can easily run other
VMs (e.g., Java) with more than 3 GB. But, let's not even go there: I can
run Pharo with 1Gb on Mac without problems. According to your reasoning we
might end up downgrading the Mac VM. Some data does not fit in
On Jul 9, 2013, at 9:22 AM, Igor Stasenko siguc...@gmail.com wrote:
On 9 July 2013 09:13, Esteban Lorenzano esteba...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jul 9, 2013, at 9:10 AM, Igor Stasenko siguc...@gmail.com wrote:
On 8 July 2013 22:43, Tudor Girba tu...@tudorgirba.com wrote:
Hi,
Igor, please get
Yes, i wish we can be there today.
(And one day people will learn a difference between actual memory used
and reserved address space :)
Igor this is not that we are not aware that Moose should be implemented
differently but it is not simple.
- the first design in 1998 was with a
+1
and we are not users. We are programmers :)
Stef
I disagree. I think it is good if the VM is able to adapt so in the case
where no switch is used the VM does its best to adapt to the requirements.
But there are _always_ use cases where you need to fine-tune. If you have an
application
Ouch this is why we will have to think hard on our next priorities.
Stef
On Jul 9, 2013, at 3:49 PM, Esteban Lorenzano esteba...@gmail.com wrote:
In fact, problem is even worst. I wanted to watch how the GC behaves over
500m of memory occupied.
I though on a test that would create/destroy
[I know there were some discussions on the topic and the topic of 64-bit VM
but I'm not sure where we stand today].
I would like to know if we can allocate more than 500MB for pharo virtual
machine in Windows? I am getting an Out Of memory msg and the following
VM statistics when trying to parse a
@lists.pharo.org Sent: Monday, 8 July 2013, 12:05 Subject: [Pharo-users] More than 500MB for windows [I know there were some discussions on the topic and the topic of 64-bit VM but I'm not sure where we stand today].I would like to know if we can allocate more than 500MB for pharo virtual machine
On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 1:11 PM, Sven Van Caekenberghe s...@stfx.eu wrote:
Hi Usman,
On 08 Jul 2013, at 13:05, Usman Bhatti usman.bha...@gmail.com wrote:
[I know there were some discussions on the topic and the topic of 64-bit
VM but I'm not sure where we stand today].
I would like to
pharo is welcome pharo-users@lists.pharo.org
*Sent:* Monday, 8 July 2013, 12:05
*Subject:* [Pharo-users] More than 500MB for windows
[I know there were some discussions on the topic and the topic of 64-bit
VM but I'm not sure where we stand today].
I would like to know if we can allocate more than
Same question again. And same answer (i have no other yet).
Why just don't use disk memory?
I know it is extra effort, but that's what all software does, when it has
to deal with big amounts of data.
Why in smalltalk it should be different?
Of course, on your place, i would also prefer that
Hi,
Igor, please get this point of view out of your system :).
First, not all programming languages are like this: You can easily run other
VMs (e.g., Java) with more than 3 GB. But, let's not even go there: I can run
Pharo with 1Gb on Mac without problems. According to your reasoning we might
I am with Doru here.
Today, 500MB is NOTHINGG.
NOTHING.
NOTHING.
A LATOP comes with 8GB. 16x more than the max the VM can allocate.
For one of my clients, I have just set up a server with 32GB. It has 64x
than the max a Pharo VM can allocate. Really?
Going to disk is not always a
15 matches
Mail list logo
