Hello everyone,
I have a small question about NativeBoost : How does the "+" operator when
applied to a pointer translates into NativeBoost code ?
To give a bit of context, what I want to do is to reallocate some
non-contiguous bytes in memory to a buffer. Basically, I have an array of
integers i
> On 08 Jun 2015, at 4:41 , Matthieu Lacaton wrote:
>
> Hello everyone,
>
> I have a small question about NativeBoost : How does the "+" operator when
> applied to a pointer translates into NativeBoost code ?
>
> To give a bit of context, what I want to do is to reallocate some
> non-contig
Hello Henrik,
Thank you very much for your answer. However, the code you provided is some
sort of assembly right ? So does it mean that I need to learn assembly to
do what I want ?
I'm asking that because I don't know anything about assembly so it will
take me some time to learn.
Cheers,
Matthi
There are many ways to Rome :)
If you just need some externally allocated objects in the formats you specified
you can do the cache extraction using nothing but normal Smalltalk:
intArray := (NBExternalArray ofType: 'int').
data := intArray new: 1000.
1 to:data size do:[:i |data at:i put: i].
ca
> On 09 Jun 2015, at 2:59 , Henrik Johansen
> wrote:
>
> MyClass createCacheOf: data in: cache.
Forgot to change this; you need to pass in the ExternalArray addresses as
parameters, not the ExternalArrays themselves.
MyClass createCacheOf: data address in: cache address
Cheers,
Henry
As i understand, in general, the problem that you described is in following:
- you want to pass an address of your buffer contents, but started not from
very first element of your buffer, but somewhere inside a buffer.
In smalltalk you cannot reference an element of array,
only the object (array i
Henrik
you amaze me :)
Stef
Le 9/6/15 14:59, Henrik Johansen a écrit :
There are many ways to Rome :)
If you just need some externally allocated objects in the formats you
specified you can do the cache extraction using nothing but normal
Smalltalk:
intArray := (NBExternalArray ofType: 'in
*@ Igor*
> As i understand, in general, the problem that you described is in
> following:
> - you want to pass an address of your buffer contents, but started not from
> very first element of your buffer, but somewhere inside a buffer.
Yes ! Exactly that. I'm bad at explaining things :(
Unfor
On 9 June 2015 at 20:05, Matthieu Lacaton
wrote:
> *@ Igor*
>
>
>> As i understand, in general, the problem that you described is in
>> following:
>> - you want to pass an address of your buffer contents, but started not
>> from
>> very first element of your buffer, but somewhere inside a buffer.
